Cost-utility analysis of deferiprone for the treatment of beta-thalassaemia patients with chronic iron overload: a UK perspective

Abacus International, 6 Talisman Business Centre, Talisman Road, Bicester, Oxfordshire, OX26 6HR, UK; ApoPharma Inc., 200 Barmac Drive, Toronto, M9L 227, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31((9):):807-22.
BACKGROUND Patients with beta-thalassaemia major experience chronic iron overload due to regular blood transfusions. Chronic iron overload can be treated using iron-chelating therapies such as desferrioxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP) and deferasirox (DFX) monotherapy, or DFO-DFP combination therapy. OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the relative cost effectiveness of these regimens over a 5-year timeframe from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective, including personal and social services. METHODS A Markov model was constructed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the treatment regimens over 5years. Based on published randomized controlled trial evidence, it was assumed that all four treatment regimens had a comparable effect on serum ferritin concentration (SFC) and liver iron concentration (LIC), and that DFP was more effective for reducing cardiac morbidity and mortality. Published utility scores for route of administration were used, with subcutaneously administered DFO assumed to incur a greater quality of life (QoL) burden than the oral chelators DFP and DFX. Healthcare resource use, drug costs (2010/2011 costs), and utilities associated with adverse events were also considered, with the effect of varying all parameters assessed in sensitivity analysis. Incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated for each treatment, with cost effectiveness expressed as incremental cost per QALY. Assumptions that DFP conferred no cardiac morbidity, mortality, or morbidity and mortality benefit were also explored in scenario analysis. RESULTS DFP was the dominant strategy in all scenarios modelled, providing greater QALY gains at a lower cost. Sensitivity analysis showed that DFP dominated all other treatments unless the QoL burden associated with the route of administration was greater for DFP than for DFO, which is unlikely to be the case. DFP had >99% likelihood of being cost effective against all comparators at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS In this analysis, DFP appeared to be the most cost-effective treatment available for managing chronic iron overload in beta-thalassaemia patients. Use of DFP in these patients could therefore result in substantial cost savings.
Study details
Study Design : Economic Study
Language : English
Additional Material : Erratum in Pharmoeconomics 31(12) p.1185-6. DOI 10.1007/s40273-013-0101-2
Credits : Bibliographic data from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine