Department of Critical Care Medicine, Universite de Montreal, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Hopital Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Universite de Montreal, Canada; Critical Care Division and Montreal Burn Center, Hotel-Dieu de Montreal, Canada.
Burns : Journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2016;43((1):):17-24
OBJECTIVE The objective was to systematically review the literature summarizing the effect on mortality of albumin compared to non-albumin solutions during the fluid resuscitation phase of burn injured patients. DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL and the content of two leading journals in burn care, Burns and Journal of Burn Care and Research. STUDY SELECTION Two reviewers independently
selected randomized controlled trials comparing albumin vs. non-albumin solutions for the acute resuscitation of patients with >20% body surface area involvement. DATA EXTRACTION Reviewers abstracted data independently and assessed methodological quality of the included trials using predefined criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS A random effects model was used to assess mortality. We identified 164 trials of which, 4 trials involving 140 patients met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the methodological quality of the included trials was fair. We did not find a significant benefit of albumin solutions as resuscitation fluid on mortality in burn patients (relative risk (RR) 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-4.08). Total volume of fluid infusion during the phase of resuscitation was lower in patients receiving albumin containing solution -1.00ml/kg/%TBSA (total body surface area) (95% CI, -1.42 to -0.58). CONCLUSION The pooled estimate demonstrated a neutral effect on mortality in burn patients resuscitated acutely with albumin solutions. Due to limited evidence and uncertainty, an adequately powered, high quality trial could be required to assess the impact of albumin solutions on mortality in burn patients.
Additional Material
:
Letter discussing re-analysis in Burns (2016) DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.09.033">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.09.033</a> Response to letter in Burns (2017) DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.002">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.002</a>
Credits
:
Bibliographic data from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
