Is there a risk of transfusion-transmissible infections after percutaneous needle treatments in blood donors? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium. Cochrane Belgium, Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (Cebam), Leuven, Belgium. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Blood Services, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium.

Vox sanguinis. 2019
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The donor medical questionnaire identifies a blood donor's history of known blood safety risks. Current Australian, Canadian, European and USA legislation temporarily defers blood donors who received different percutaneous needle treatments (i.e. tattooing, acupuncture and piercing) from blood donation. This systematic review aimed to scientifically underpin these deferrals by identifying the best available evidence on the association between percutaneous needle treatments and the risk of transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Studies from three databases investigating the link between percutaneous needle treatments and TTIs (HBV, HCV and HIV infection) in blood donors were retained and assessed on eligibility by two reviewers independently. The association between percutaneous needle treatments and TTIs was expressed by conducting meta-analyses and calculating pooled effect measures (odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs). The GRADE methodology (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS We identified 1242 references and finally included 21 observational studies. Twenty studies assessed the link between percutaneous needle treatments and HCV infection and found that blood donors receiving these treatments had an increased risk of HCV infection (tattooing: pooled OR 5.28, 95% CI [4.33, 6.44], P < 0.00001 (low-quality evidence); acupuncture: pooled OR 1.56, 95% CI [1.17, 2.08], P = 0.03 (very low-quality evidence); and piercing: pooled OR 3.25, 95% CI [1.68, 6.30], P = 0.0005 (low-quality evidence)). CONCLUSION Percutaneous needle treatments may be associated with an increased HCV infection risk. Further high-quality studies are required to formulate stronger evidence-based recommendations on percutaneous needle treatments as a blood donor deferral criterion.
Study details
Study Design : Systematic Review
Language : eng
Credits : Bibliographic data from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine