Prophylactic tranexamic acid among women undergoing vaginal delivery to reduce postpartum blood loss and related morbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials

College of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: aabuzaid@live.com. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternity and Children Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Saud Hospital, Qassim-Unayzah, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia. Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction. 2022;:102378
Full text from:

Other resources

Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that inspected the efficacy and safety of prophylactic TXA compared with control (placebo/no treatment) among women undergoing vaginal delivery on reducing postpartum blood loss and related morbidities. METHODS Six databases were screened from inception until 06-December-2021. The pooled data were summarized as mean difference or risk ratio, respectively, with 95% confidence interval in a fixed- or random-effects model. RESULTS Sixteen studies comprising 17 RCT treatment arms were included. There were 7075 patients; 3548 and 2537 patients were allocated to prophylactic TXA and control groups, respectively. Overall, the included RCTs had a low risk of bias. Prophylactic TXA correlated with a significant decrease in mean postpartum blood loss and mean change in hemoglobin/hematocrit. Moreover, prophylactic TXA was linked to decreased incidence rates of postpartum hemorrhage, need for blood transfusion, and need for additional uterotonic agents. Nevertheless, prophylactic TXA culminated in significantly higher incidence rates of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, all of which were well-tolerated. There was no increased risk of thromboembolic events. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of efficacy endpoints. There was no publication bias for the endpoint of mean postpartum blood loss. CONCLUSION Among patients undergoing vaginal delivery, prophylactic TXA during active management of third stage of labor (AMTSL) appeared largely safe and correlated with a significant decrease in postpartum blood loss and related morbidities compared with control intervention. Prophylactic TXA should be integrated as a "formal" component of AMTSL among women undergoing vaginal delivery.
Study details
Study Design : Systematic Review
Language : eng
Credits : Bibliographic data from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine