Comparison of multiple treatments in the management of transplant-related thrombotic microangiopathy: a network meta-analysis

National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China. Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis of Ministry of Health, Suzhou, China. National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. hanyue@suda.edu.cn. Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China. hanyue@suda.edu.cn. Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis of Ministry of Health, Suzhou, China. hanyue@suda.edu.cn. State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou, China. hanyue@suda.edu.cn.

Annals of hematology. 2022
Full text from:

Other resources

PICO Summary

Population

Patients receiving treatment for transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA), (6 studies, n= 71).

Intervention

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE).

Comparison

Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM). Eculizumab. Immunosuppression manipulation (ISM). Supportive care.

Outcome

There were significant differences in response rates for each treatment. Achieving analysis through direct and indirect evidence in the rank probabilities showed that rTM was most likely to be rank 1 (64.98%), Eculizumab intervention rank 2 (48.66%), ISM rank 3 (32.24%), intervention rank 4 (69.56%), and supportive care intervention rank 5 (70.20%). Eculizumab and ISM had significantly higher efficacy than supportive care (odds ratio (OR): 18.04, 18.21 respectively); and TPE had lower efficacy than all other TA-TMA therapies exception to supportive care.
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a fatal post-transplant complication. It has a high mortality rate and worse prognosis, but treatment strategies remain controversial. We screened 6 out of 3453 studies on the treatment of TA-TMA. These investigations compared 5 treatment strategies with a network meta-analysis approach. The final outcome was the proportion of patients who responded to these therapies. There were significant differences in response rates for each treatment. Achieving analysis through direct and indirect evidence in the rank probabilities shows that rTM (recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin) is most likely to be rank 1 (64.98%), Eculizumab intervention rank 2 (48.66%), ISM (immunosuppression manipulation) rank 3 (32.24%), TPE (therapeutic plasma exchange) intervention rank 4 (69.56%), and supportive care intervention rank 5 (70.20%). Eculizumab and ISM have significantly higher efficacy than supportive care (odds ratio (OR): 18.04, 18.21 respectively); and TPE having lower efficacy than all other TA-TMA therapies exception to supportive care. In our study, rTM and Eculizumab may be the best choice when treating TA-TMA.
Study details
Study Design : Systematic Review
Language : eng
Credits : Bibliographic data from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine