1.
Efficiency of platelet-rich plasma in the management of burn wounds: A meta-analysis
Imam, M. S., Alotaibi, A. A. S., Alotaibi, N. O. M., Alosaimi, N. S., Alotaibi, S. G. M., Abdelrahim, M. E. A.
International wound journal. 2023
Abstract
The meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficiency of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the management of burn wounds (BWs). Using dichotomous or contentious random- or fixed-effects models, the outcomes of this meta-analysis were examined and the odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Thirteen examinations from 2009 to 2023 were enrolled for the present meta-analysis, including 808 individuals with BWs. PRP had significantly shorter healing time (MD, -5.80; 95% CI, -7.73 to -3.88, p < 0.001), higher healing rate (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.05-4.80, p < 0.001), higher healed area percent (MD, 12.67; 95% CI, 9.79-15.55, p < 0.001) and higher graft take area percent (MD, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.51-7.26, p = 0.003) compared with standard therapy in patients with BW. However, no significant difference was found between PRP and standard therapy in graft take ratio (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.86-3.34, p = 0.13) and infection rate (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.20-1.47, p = 0.23) in patients with BW. The examined data revealed that PRP had a significantly shorter healing time, a higher healing rate, a higher healed area percent and a higher graft take area percent; however, no significant difference was found in graft take ratio or infection rate compared with standard therapy in patients with BW. Yet, attention should be paid to its values since all of the selected examinations had a low sample size and some comparisons had a low number of selected studies.
2.
Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of burn wounds: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Huang, H., Sun, X., Zhao, Y.
Transfusion and Apheresis Science : Official Journal of the World Apheresis Association : Official Journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis. 2021;60(1):102964
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of burn wounds through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive study from electronic medical journal databases. The primary outcome was healing rate, and the secondary outcomes were healing time, adverse events, pain score and scar score. The data was analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12. The odds ratio (OR) among different groups was calculated by using 95 % confidence interval (CI). RESULTS We included 8 randomized controlled trials with a total of 539 patients. The results showed that platelet-rich plasma could improve the healing rate of burn wound (OR 4.43, 95 % CI 2.13-9.22). The wound healing time of the platelet-rich plasma treatment group was significantly shorter than that of the conventional treatment group (OR -4.23, 95 % CI -5.48 to -2.98), both the superficial burn (OR -3.80, 95 % CI -4.53 to -3.07) and the deep burn group (OR -4.65, 95 % CI -6.90 to -2.40) had shorter healing time. Otherwise, the incidences of adverse events (OR 0.30, 95 % CI 0.11-0.78), pain score (OR -0.80, 95 % CI -1.40 to -0.21) and scar score (OR -0.38, 95 % CI -0.69 to -0.07) were all better in the platelet rich plasma treatment group. CONCLUSION Topical platelet-rich plasma treatment on burn wounds can improve wound healing and reduce the incidence of adverse events. Further research is needed to standardize the preparation and use of platelet-rich plasma and to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of burn wounds.
3.
Effectiveness of platelet rich plasma in burn wound healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Zheng W, Zhao DL, Zhao YQ, Li ZY
The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2020;:1-25
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of burn wounds.Methods: A comprehensive literature survey was conducted in electronic medical journal databases to identify studies that examined the effect of PRP treatment to burn wounds and meta-analyses of mean differences (MD) standardized MD, or odds ratios (OR) were performed.Results: The percentage of graft take was not significantly different between PRP-treated and control wound areas. Healing rate was significantly better in PRP-treated wounds. Healing time was also significantly less in PRP-treated wounds. There was no significant difference between PRP-treated and control wound areas in epithelialization, or in the incidence of adverse events. Incidence of infection was also not different between PRP-treated and control wound areas. Scar assessment score was significantly better in PRP-treated than in control wound areas.Conclusion: PRP treatment to burn wounds is found to improve healing. Variations in study design and sample size, types of wounds, PRP preparation protocols, and high risk of bias in some of the included studies may have impact on these outcomes.
4.
The effect of mesenchymal stem cells combined with platelet-rich plasma on skin wound healing
Mahmoudian-Sani M R, Rafeei F, Amini R, Saidijam M
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2018;17((5):):650-659
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent stem cells that have the potential of proliferation, high self-renewal, and the potential of multilineage differentiation. The differentiation potential of the MSCs in vivo and in vitro has caused these cells to be regarded as potentially appropriate tools for wound healing. After the burn, trauma or removal of the tumor of wide wounds is developed. Although standard treatment for skin wounds is primary healing or skin grafting, they are not always practical mainly because of limited autologous skin grafting. EVIDENCE ACQUISITIONS Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Google Scholar, PubMed (NLM), LISTA (EBSCO), and Web of Science have been searched. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For clinical use of the MSCs in wound healing, two key issues should be taken into account: First, engineering biocompatible scaffolds clinical use of which leads to the least amount of side effects without any immunologic response and secondly, use of stem cells secretions with the least amount of clinical complications despite their high capability of healing damage. CONCLUSION In light of the MSCs' high capability of proliferation and multilineage differentiation as well as their significant role in modulating immunity, these cells can be used in combination with tissue engineering techniques. Moreover, the MSCs' secretions can be used in cell therapy to heal many types of wounds. The combination of MSCs and PRP aids wound healing which could potentially be used to promote wound healing.
