-
1.
3-Factor versus 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrates for the Reversal of Vitamin K Antagonist-Associated Coagulopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Puchstein, D., Kork, F., Schöchl, H., Rayatdoost, F., Grottke, O.
Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2023;123(1):40-53
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Long-term anticoagulation is used worldwide to prevent or treat thrombotic events. Anticoagulant therapy using vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is well established; however, anticoagulants carry an increased risk of potentially life-threatening bleeding. In cases of bleeding or need for surgery, patients require careful management, balancing the need for rapid anticoagulant reversal with risk of thromboembolic events. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) replenish clotting factors and reverse VKA-associated coagulopathy. Two forms of PCC, 3-factor (3F-PCC) and 4-factor (4F-PCC), are available. Using PRISMA methodology, we systematically reviewed whether 4F-PCC is superior to 3F-PCC for the reversal of VKA-associated coagulopathy. Of the 392 articles identified, 48 full texts were reviewed, with 11 articles identified using criteria based on the PICOS format. Data were captured from 1,155 patients: 3F-PCC, n = 651; 4F-PCC, n = 504. ROBINS-I was used to assess bias. Nine studies showed international normalized ratio (INR) normalization to a predefined goal, ranging from ≤1.5 to ≤1.3, following PCC treatment. Meta-analysis of the data showed that 4F-PCC was favorable compared with 3F-PCC overall (odds ratio [OR]: 3.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.88-6.52, p < 0.0001) and for patients with a goal INR of ≤1.5 or ≤1.3 (OR: 3.45; 95% CI: 1.42-8.39, p = 0.006; OR: 3.25; 95% CI: 1.30-8.13, p = 0.01, respectively). However, heterogeneity was substantial (I (2) = 62%, I (2) = 70%, I (2) = 64%). Neither a significant difference in mortality (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.42-1.24, p = 0.23) nor in thromboembolisms was reported. These data suggest that 4F-PCC is better suited than 3F-PCC for the treatment of patients with VKA-associated coagulopathy, but further work is required for a definitive recommendation.
-
2.
Fixed Versus Variable Dosing of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Bleeding Complications of Vitamin K Antagonists-The PROPER3 Randomized Clinical Trial
Abdoellakhan, R. A., Khorsand, N., Ter Avest, E., Lameijer, H., Faber, L. M., Ypma, P. F., Nieuwenhuizen, L., Veeger, Njgm, Meijer, K.
Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2022;79(1):20-30
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine if a fixed dose of 1000 IU of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is as effective as traditional variable dosing based on body weight and international normalized ratio (INR) for reversal of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) anticoagulation. METHODS In this open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients with nonintracranial bleeds requiring VKA reversal with 4F-PCC were allocated to either a 1,000-IU fixed dose of 4F-PCC or the variable dose. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with effective hemostasis according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition. The design was noninferiority with a lower 95% confidence interval of no more than -6%. When estimating sample size, we assumed that fixed dosing would be 4% superior. RESULTS From October 2015 until January 2020, 199 of 310 intended patients were included before study termination due to decreasing enrollment rates. Of the 199 patients, 159 were allowed in the per-protocol analysis. Effective hemostasis was achieved in 87.3% (n=69 of 79) in fixed compared to 89.9% (n=71 of 79) in the variable dosing cohort (risk difference 2.5%, 95% confidence interval -13.3 to 7.9%, P=.27). Median door-to-needle times were 109 minutes (range 16 to 796) in fixed and 142 (17 to 1076) for the variable dose (P=.027). INR less than 2.0 at 60 minutes after 4F-PCC infusion was reached in 91.2% versus 91.7% (P=1.0). CONCLUSION The large majority of patients had good clinical outcome after 4F-PCC use; however, noninferiority of the fixed dose could not be demonstrated because the design assumed the fixed dose would be 4% superior. Door-to-needle time was shortened with the fixed dose, and INR reduction was similar in both dosing regimens.
-
3.
Evaluation of fixed versus variable dosing of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent warfarin reversal
Stoecker Z, Van Amber B, Woster C, Isenberger K, Peterson M, Rupp P, Chrenka E, Dries D
The American journal of emergency medicine. 2021;48:282-287
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE This study compares the safety and efficacy of a fixed dose of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) to the FDA-approved variable dosing for reversal of warfarin-induced anticoagulation. METHODS This was a single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial with subjects randomized to 4FPCC at a fixed dose of 1500 IU or the FDA-approved variable dosing regimen. The primary efficacy outcome (reversal success) was defined as a post-intervention international normalized ratio (INR) of less than or equal to 1.5. Given that 4FPCC is the standard of care for reversal of warfarin-induced anticoagulation an active-controlled approach was employed with the two dosing regimens compared based on efficacy, cost, and safety outcomes. RESULTS 71 subjects (34 in the fixed dose group and 37 in the variable dose group) completed the study. There were no significant differences in age, gender, weight, initial INR, or indication for 4FPCC administration between the two treatment groups. Reversal success in the fixed-dose group was 61.8%, while in the variable dose group reversal success was 89.2%. Reversal success in the fixed-dose group was significantly lower than the rate of reversal success in the variable dose group (27.4% lower, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION The results of this study provide evidence that fixed dosing results in lower reversal success rates as compared to variable dosing of 4FPCC for warfarin-induced anticoagulation.
-
4.
Prothrombin complex concentrates and andexanet for management of direct factor Xa inhibitor related bleeding: a meta-analysis
Luo C, Chen F, Chen YH, Zhao CF, Feng CZ, Liu HX, Luo DZQ
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2021;25(6):2637-2653
Abstract
There are potential concerns related to bleeding caused by oral anticoagulants, especially in the elderly. Andexanet alfa has been authorized for use to reverse the effects of oral anticoagulants. Off-label use of four factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for the reversal of oral factor Xa inhibitors is common. However, not much is known about their efficacy and safety profile. The intent of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa for management of major bleeding due to oral factor Xa inhibitors. Comprehensive searches were done systematically through PubMed, Scopus and Google scholar databases. Studies that were retrospective record based or adopted prospective cohort approach and reported either of the three main outcomes, i.e., achieved hemostasis rate or rate of thrombotic events or mortality rate were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analyses were done using STATA version 13.0. A total of 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. All the studies had a single arm with no control/comparator group. The pooled rate of good to excellent hemostatic control upon use of andexanet was 80% (95% CI; 72% to 88%) and for 4F-PCC, it was 76% (95% CI; 70% to 83%). A comparatively higher pooled rate of thrombotic complications upon use of andexanet [13% (95% CI; 5% to 20%) was noted, compared to use of aPCC/4F-PCC [4% (95% CI; 3% to 5%). The pooled all-cause mortality rate within 30 days of administration was 24% (95% CI; 12% to 35%) with andexanet use and 19% (95% CI; 14% to 25%) for aPCC/4F-PCC. The findings suggest that use of both andexanet and aPCC/4F-PCC achieves a good hemostasis but there is an associated risk of thrombotic events and mortality. Future studies should have a control group to better establish evidence on efficacy and safety of these agents.
-
5.
Management of direct factor Xa inhibitor-related major bleeding with prothrombin complex concentrate: a meta-analysis
Piran S, Khatib R, Schulman S, Majeed A, Holbrook A, Witt DM, Wiercioch W, Schunemann HJ, Nieuwlaat R
Blood advances. 2019;3(2):158-167
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
A targeted antidote for reversal of direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors is now available for clinical use in the United States, but it is costly and has limited availability. In a systematic review, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) as an alternative for managing direct FXa inhibitor-related major bleeding. A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials up to September 2018. No comparative studies were found. Ten case series with 340 patients who received PCC for direct FXa inhibitor-related major bleeding were included. The pooled proportion of patients with effective management of major bleeding was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.76) in 2 studies using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.92) in 8 studies that did not use the ISTH criteria; all-cause mortality was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.26), and thromboembolism rate was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.08). On the basis of evidence with very low certainty from single-arm case series, it is difficult to determine whether 4F-PCC in addition to cessation of direct oral FXa inhibitor is more effective than cessation of direct oral FXa inhibitor alone in patients with direct FXa inhibitor-related major bleeding.
-
6.
A systematic review of prothrombin complex concentrate dosing strategies to reverse vitamin K antagonist therapy
Khorsand N, Kooistra HA, van Hest RM, Veeger NJ, Meijer K
Thrombosis Research. 2015;135((1):):9-19.
Abstract
Management of patients with a major bleed while on vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is a common clinical challenge. Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCC) provide a rapid reversal of VKA induced coagulopathy. However, a well-defined PCC dosing strategy, especially in emergency setting, is still lacking. We performed a systematic review to describe the currently used PCC dosing strategies and to present their efficacy in terms of target INR achievement and clinical outcome. We used outcome definitions as used in the individual studies. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting the use of PCC for emergency VKA reversal. Twenty-eight studies, including 4 randomized trials, were found. In these, fifteen different PCC dosing protocols were identified in which the PCC dose ranged from 8 to 50IU factor IX/kg. These strategies were based on: bodyweight; bodyweight and initial INR; bodyweight and initial INR and target INR; individual doctors decision; or a fixed dose. Study quality was moderate with large variation in outcome definitions. Relatively good clinical and INR outcomes were reported with the use of any treatment protocol while less good results were reported for INR outcome when a predefined protocol was missing (doctor strategy). Lowest PCC dosages were infused in the fixed dose strategy. In emergency VKA reversal, a predefined PCC dosing protocol seems essential. We found no evidence that one dosing strategy is superior. Future studies should be designed to investigate if body weight and INR are relevant for PCC dosing. In these, we need uniform outcome definitions. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
-
7.
Health economics of inhibitor bypassing agents in haemophilia A-activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) Polish
Szmurlo D, Derylo L, Rys P, Wladysiuk M
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski. 2011;30((177):):202-7.
Abstract
Haemophilia A is a sex-linked recessive genetic disorder associated with haemorrhagic diathesis due to reduced plasma activity of coagulation factor VIII, i.e., below 50% of the normal value (< 0.5 IU/ ml). The treatment of haemophilia A-Inhibitor patients is bidirectional. Major issues with treatment are inhibitor eradication and control of haemorrhage. The aim of the analysis was to evaluate costs and effects of the use of aPCC and rFVIIa in haemophilia A-inhibitor patients in on-demand treatment, perioperative prophylaxis and long-term prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The cost analysis was performed from the payer's perspective for all treatment schemes. Dosage and duration of treatment were obtained from a systematic review of clinical trials, Summary of Product Characteristics and clinical practice guidelines. Analysis was conducted in accordance with the AHTAPol (Agency for Health Technology Assessment in Poland) guidelines. RESULTS The use of aPCC in on-demand treatment of children and adults during one day or one episode of bleeding (irrespective of the intensity of bleeding: from mild to severe) reduced the payer's expenditures in comparison to the use of rFVIIa. The use of aPCC in perioperative prophylaxis of children and adults during minor and major surgical interventions and implantations of central venous access devices was associated with savings for the payer in comparison to the use of rFVIIa, irrespectively of dosage of both drugs. Break even point analysis showed that the use of aPCC in long-term prophylaxis may be less expensive than the use of aPCC in on-demand treatment if bleedings last for 2.5 days or more. Sensitivity analysis showed that assumptions concerning body weight of patients significantly influence expenses of the public payer. However, the use of aPCC was associated with lower costs than the use of rFVIIa, irrespectively of the patients' body weight. CONCLUSIONS In order to demonstrate the actual size of expenditures on treatment of haemophilia A-Inhibitor patients, collection of data concerning real clinical practice in Poland is required.
-
8.
Cost minimization analysis to compare activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) and recombinant factor VIIa for haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major orthopaedic surgeries
Bonnet PO, Yoon BS, Wong WY, Boswell K, Ewenstein BM
Haemophilia. 2009;15((5):):1083-9.
Abstract
Benefits of bypassing agents for maintaining haemostasis in major surgeries have been described in the literature; however, their use has a substantial economic impact. This study assessed the cost of FEIBA, an activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) when used in inhibitor patients undergoing major surgeries. After reviewing published literature, a cost minimization model was developed describing dosing regimens recommended and used during major surgeries for FEIBA (pre-operative: 75-100 U kg(-1); postoperative: 75-100 U kg(-1) q 8-12 h days 1-5 and 75-100 U kg(-1) q 12 h days 6-14) and rFVIIa (pre-operative: 90 microg kg(-1); intra-operative: 90 microg kg(-1) q 2 h; postoperative: 90 microg kg(-1) q 2-4 h days 1-5 and 90 microg kg(-1) q 6 h days 6-14). Using a 75 kg patient and US prices, total drug cost was calculated for three scenarios: use of FEIBA or rFVIIa alone and a third case combining rFVIIa pre- and intra-operative and FEIBA throughout a 14-day postoperative period. Dosage amounts of modelled bypassing agents were similar to cases in the literature. Using FEIBA instead of rFVIIa would decrease total drug cost by >50% and save over $400,000 per surgery. Sequential use of both bypassing agents would increase total drug cost by 9% when compared with FEIBA alone, but would remain >40% lower than rFVIIa alone. Univariate sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of results. As large amounts of bypassing agents are necessary for patients with inhibitors to undergo major surgeries, cost is a major consideration. Use of FEIBA alone or in combination with rFVIIa has emerged as a cost-saving approach.
-
9.
High purity factor IX and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC): pharmacokinetics and evidence that factor IXa is the thrombogenic trigger in PCC
Philippou H, Adami A, Lane DA, MacGregor IR, Tuddenham EG, Lowe GD, Rumley A, Ludlam CA
Thrombosis & Haemostasis. 1996;76((1):):23-8.
Abstract
Recent studies using assays for surrogate markers of thrombogenicity in man have demonstrated that activation of the coagulation system occurs following infusion of clinical doses of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) but not after the same doses of high-purity factor IX concentrates (HP-FIX) in patients with haemophilia B. Here we have investigated the mechanism of such thrombogenesis by applying assays that detect early-through to late-events in coagulation system activation in a pharmacokinetic cross-over study of 50 IU/kg PCC and a new HP-FIX product in haemophilia B patients. Satisfactory recoveries and half-lives were observed for both concentrates. HP-FIX caused no increases in thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), prothrombin activation peptide fragment F1+2 (F1+2), factor X activation peptide (FXAP) or factor VIIa (FVIIa). In contrast the same dose of factor IX in the form of PCC was followed by significant increases over pre-infusion levels of TAT, F1+2 and FXAP, but not FVIIa. Elevations of FIXAP occurred after both HP-FIX and PCC but did not reach normal levels and were attributed to normalisation of the FIX concentration in those patients whose levels of FIXAP were initially low. We conclude that the thrombogenic trigger associated with PCC infusion occurs at the level of factor X activation. In the absence of any increase in FVIIa, we would attribute this to the likely presence of FIXa in the PCC.
-
10.
Thrombin generation is not increased in the blood of hemophilia B patients after the infusion of a purified factor IX concentrate
Mannucci PM, Bauer KA, Gringeri A, Barzegar S, Bottasso B, Simoni L, Rosenberg RD
Blood. 1990;76((12):):2540-5.
Abstract
Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC), licensed for the treatment of hemophilia B, are known to carry a significant risk of thromboembolic complications. Although the reasons for thrombogenicity are not completely understood, several manufacturers have developed purified factor IX concentrates that contain negligible amounts of the other vitamin K-dependent factors. To evaluate whether or not the infusion of such a factor IX concentrate is followed by lesser activation of the hemostatic system than by the infusion of a PCC, we performed a series of coagulation assays on 11 hemophilia B patients before and after the administration of these two types of concentrate using a randomized cross-over design. The levels of prothrombin fragment F1 + 2, a sensitive measure of the in vivo cleavage of prothrombin by factor Xa, was significantly increased in plasma after PCC, but not after factor IX concentrate. Plasma fibrinopeptide A, a sensitive index of the enzymatic activity of thrombin on fibrinogen, also increased significantly after PCC but not after factor IX concentrate. The fragment B beta 15-42, a sensitive index of the enzymatic action of plasmin on fibrin II, did not change after either concentrate. There were also no differences in less sensitive coagulation measurements, such as plasma fibrinogen, antithrombin III, and fibrin monomers, nor in indices of platelet activation, such as beta-thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4. These findings show that the infusion of a purified factor IX concentrate can result in substantially less activation of the coagulation cascade than may be seen with PCC.