0
selected
-
1.
Blood transfusions may adversely affect survival outcomes of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Cho S, Park J, Lee M, Lee D, Choi H, Gim G, Kim L, Kang CY, Oh Y, Viveiros P, et al
Translational lung cancer research. 2021;10(4):1700-1710
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite common use in clinical practice, the impact of blood transfusions on prognosis among patients with lung cancer remains unclear. The purpose of the current study is to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of blood transfusions on survival outcomes of lung cancer patients. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Ovid MEDLINE for publications illustrating the association between blood transfusions and prognosis among people with lung cancer from inception to November 2019. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the outcomes of interest. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using the random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was evaluated with the I(2) test. Publication bias was explored via funnel plot and trim-and-fill analyses. RESULTS We included 23 cohort studies with 12,175 patients (3,027 cases and 9,148 controls) for meta-analysis. Among these records, 22 studies investigated the effect of perioperative transfusions, while one examined that of transfusions during chemotherapy. Two studies suggested the possible dose-dependent effect in accordance with the number of transfused units. In pooled analyses, blood transfusions deleteriously influenced both OS (HR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.14-1.61, P<0.001, I(2)=0%) and DFS (HR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.15-1.86, P=0.001, I(2)=0%) of people with lung cancer. No evidence of significant publication bias was detected in funnel plot and trim-and-fill analyses (OS: HR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.07-1.49, P=0.006; DFS: HR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.08-1.69, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS Blood transfusions were associated with decreased survival of patients with lung cancer.
-
2.
Red blood cell transfusions and the survival in patients with cancer undergoing curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Petrelli F, Ghidini M, Ghidini A, Sgroi G, Vavassori I, Petrò D, Cabiddu M, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, Zaniboni A, et al
Surgery today. 2021
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Allogenic red blood cell transfusions exert a potential detrimental effect on the survival when delivered to cancer patients undergoing surgery with curative intent. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between perioperative allogenic red blood cell transfusions and risk of death as well as relapse after surgery for localized solid tumors. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2019 for studies reporting the outcome of patients receiving transfusions during radical surgery for non-metastatic cancer. Risk of death and relapse were pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval {CI})]. Mortality and relapse associated with perioperative transfusion due to cancer surgery were evaluated among participants (n = 123 studies). Overall, RBC transfusions were associated with an increased risk of death [HR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.42-1.57), p < 0.01] and relapse [HR = 1.36 (95% CI 1.26-1.46), p < 0.01]. The survival was reduced even in cancer at early stages [HR = 1.45 (1.36-1.55), p < 0.01]. In cancer patients undergoing surgery, red blood cell transfusions reduced the survival and increased the risk of relapse. Transfusions based on patients' blood management policy should be performed by applying a more restrictive policy, and the planned preoperative administration of iron, if necessary, should be pursued.
PICO Summary
Population
Cancer patients undergoing surgery for localized solid tumours requiring intra- or perioperative blood transfusion (123 studies, n= 184,190).
Intervention
Systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between perioperative allogenic red blood cell transfusions and risk of death as well as relapse after surgery.
Comparison
No transfusion.
Outcome
Overall, red blood cell transfusions were associated with an increased risk of death [HR = 1.50] and relapse [HR = 1.36]. The survival was reduced even in cancer at early stages [HR = 1.45].
-
3.
Perioperative blood transfusion and ovarian cancer survival rates: A meta-analysis based on univariate, multivariate and propensity score matched data
Pergialiotis V, Thomakos N, Frountzas M, Haidopoulos D, Loutradis D, Rodolakis A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:137-143
Abstract
The negative impact of perioperative blood transfusion on survival outcomes has been reported in several cancer types. The purpose of the present study is to summarize existing evidence in ovarian cancer patients. We searched the Medline, Scopus, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases for observational and randomized trials that assessed the impact of perioperative blood transfusion on the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of ovarian cancer patients that undergone debulking surgery were selected for inclusion. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan 5.3 software using the Der-Simonian Laird random effects model. Seven studies were identified which included 2341 ovarian cancer patients. Meta-analyses that were based on univariate and multivariate reporting revealed that perioperative blood transfusion had a significant negative impact on the patient`s OS rates (OR 1.78, 95 %CI 1.16, 2.74 and OR 1.31, 95 %CI 1.00, 1.71 respectively). Disease free survival rates were also influenced according to the results of the univariate analysis (OR 1.58, 95 %CI 1.14, 2.19), however, the effect was not significant in the multivariate analysis. The analysis that was based on propensity score matched populations did not reveal differences among transfused and non-transfused. Concluding, the findings of our meta-analysis suggest that transfusion of blood products during the perioperative period is not an independent factor that may affect survival outcomes of ovarian cancer patients. Nevertheless, it should be noted that patients that receive transfusion have several potential confounders that may affect their survival outcomes.
-
4.
Perioperative blood transfusion affects oncologic outcomes after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Iwata T, Kimura S, Foerster B, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Preisser F, Nasu Y, Shariat SF
Urologic oncology. 2019
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the association of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) with oncologic outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to clarify the long-term oncologic effect of PBT in patients undergoing nephrectomy for RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus on 15th April 2018 to identify studies that compared patients who received PBT undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy for RCC to patients who did not with the aim of evaluating its impact on overall mortality (OM), cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and disease recurrence using multivariable cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 19,681 patients in 7 studies matched the selection criteria for the systematic review and meta-analysis. All 7 studies were retrospective design and published between 1994 and 2018. Our study included low quality of eligible studies due to their retrospective design and showed a significant heterogeneity. PBT was associated with OM (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 1.49, 1.24-1.78), CSM (pooled HR, 1.46, 1.20-1.77), and disease recurrence (pooled HR, 1.80, 1.03-3.12). In a subgroup analysis of 3,664 patients with nonmetastatic RCC, PBT was remained associated with OM (pooled HR, 1.91; 1.06-3.41), but not anymore with CSM (pooled HR, 1.92, 0.94-3.91) or disease recurrence (pooled HR, 2.18, 0.86-5.55). CONCLUSIONS PBT in patients undergoing nephrectomy for RCC is associated with worse overall survival. While PBT may be reflective of the underlying aggressiveness of the disease, it could be that its detrimental effect on outcomes is caused by its negative effect on the host's resilience.
