4 results
Filters • 3
Sort By
Results Per Page
Filters
4 results
3
Download the following citations:
Email the following citations:
Print the following citations:
Editor's Choice
  • Koepsell SA
  • Stolla M
  • Sedjo RL
  • Carson J
  • Knudson M
  • et al.
Transfusion. 2024 Mar;64(3):457-465 doi: 10.1111/trf.17720.
POPULATION:

Participants with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusions, enrolled in the MiPLATE trial (n= 297).

INTERVENTION:

Mirasol-treated plasma-stored apheresis platelets (Mirasol group, n= 145).

COMPARISON:

Conventional plasma-stored apheresis platelets (Control group, n= 152).

OUTCOME:

The novel primary endpoint was days of ≥Grade 2 bleeding with a non-inferiority margin of 1.6. Participants in the Mirasol group had more days of grade ≥2 bleeding than participants in the Control group (RR 2.74; 95% CI [1.66, 4.53]), the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints showed a similar proportion of participants in each group with days of grade ≥2 bleeding and no difference in red blood cell transfusion despite a higher rate of participants with platelets refractoriness, platelet transfusions, and lower corrected count increments in the Mirasol group.

BACKGROUND:

The Mirasol® Pathogen Reduction Technology System was developed to reduce transfusion-transmitted diseases in platelet (PLT) products.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:

MiPLATE trial was a prospective, multicenter, controlled, randomized, non-inferiority (NI) study of the clinical effectiveness of conventional versus Mirasol-treated Apheresis PLTs in participants with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. The novel primary endpoint was days of ≥Grade 2 bleeding with an NI margin of 1.6.

RESULTS:

After 330 participants were randomized, a planned interim analysis of 297 participants (145 MIRASOL, 152 CONTROL) receiving ≥1 study transfusion found a 2.79-relative rate (RR) in the MIRASOL compared to the CONTROL in number of days with ≥Grade 2 bleeding (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-4.67). The proportion of subjects with ≥Grade 2 bleeding was 40.0% (n = 58) in MIRASOL and 30.3% (n = 46) in CONTROL (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.97-1.81, p = .08). Corrected count increments were lower (p < .01) and the number of PLT transfusion episodes per participant was higher (RR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.41) in MIRASOL. There was no difference in the days of PLT support (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% CI 0.68-1.08) or total number of red blood cell transfusions (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.91-1.37) between MIRASOL versus CONTROL. Transfusion emergent adverse events were reported in 119 MIRASOL participants (84.4%) compared to 133 (82.6%) participants in CONTROL (p = NS).

DISCUSSION:

This study did not support that MIRASOL was non-inferior compared to conventional platelets using the novel endpoint number of days with ≥Grade 2 bleeding in MIRASOL when compared to CONTROL.

Editor's Choice
  • Buckstein R
  • Callum J
  • Prica A
  • Bowen D
  • Wells RA
  • et al.
Am J Hematol. 2024 Mar;99(3):473-476 doi: 10.1002/ajh.27181.
POPULATION:

Red blood cell, transfusion dependent patients with myelodysplastic syndromes enrolled in two feasibility trials: REDDS in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand, and RBC-Enhance in Canada (n= 66).

INTERVENTION:

Liberal transfusion strategy (maintain Hb 110-125 g/L), (n= 33).

COMPARISON:

Restrictive transfusion strategy (maintain Hb 85-100 g/L), (n= 33).

OUTCOME:

The transfusion strategy was applied for 12 weeks. In total, 232 and 471 units of red blood cells were transfused in the restrictive and liberal arms, respectively. Patients in the liberal arm had more complete blood count tests (13.8 vs. 10.3), a mean of 3.1 ± 2.9 more transfusion visits, and a mean of 6.3 ± 5.9 extra units of blood. Overall, the authors of this combined analysis of two feasibility trials, observed less variability in Hb levels in the liberal arm with patients reporting clinically important improvements pre- and post-transfusion (compared with baseline) in selected symptom and functional domains. However, many patients in both transfusion arms experienced stability or declines in their scores.

Editor's Choice
  • van Beers EJ
  • Al-Samkari H
  • Grace RF
  • Barcellini W
  • Glenthøj A
  • et al.
Blood Adv. 2024 Feb 8; doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011743.
POPULATION:

Adults with pyruvate kinase deficiency not regularly transfused, enrolled in the phase 3 ACTIVATE clinical trial and long term extension (LTE) (n= 80).

INTERVENTION:

Mitapivat throughout ACTIVATE/LTE baseline to week (W) 96 (mitapivat-to-mitapivat M/M arm, n= 40).

COMPARISON:

Switched from placebo (baseline to W24) to mitapivat W24 to 96 (placebo-to-mitapivat P/M arm, n= 40).

OUTCOME:

Changes from baseline in markers of iron overload and erythropoiesis were assessed to W96. Improvements in hepcidin (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] 4770.0 ng/L [-1532.3, 11,072.3]), erythroferrone (-9834.9 ng/L [-14,328.4, -5341.3]), soluble transferrin receptor (-56.0 nmol/L [-84.8, -27.2]), and erythropoietin (-32.85 IU/L [-54.65, -11.06]) were observed in the M/M arm from baseline to W24, sustained to W96. No improvements were observed in the P/M arm to W24; however, upon transitioning to mitapivat, improvements similar to the M/M arm were seen. Mean (95% CI) changes from baseline in liver iron concentration by magnetic resonance imaging at W96 were -2.0 mg Fe/g dry weight (dw) (-4.8, -0.8; M/M arm) and -1.8 mg Fe/g dw (-4.4, 0.80; P/M arm).

Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is a rare, hereditary disease characterized by chronic hemolytic anemia. Iron overload is a common complication regardless of age, genotype, or transfusion history. Mitapivat, an oral, allosteric PK activator, improves anemia and hemolysis in adult patients with PK deficiency. Mitapivat's impact on iron overload and ineffective erythropoiesis was evaluated in adults with PK deficiency who were not regularly transfused in the phase 3 ACTIVATE trial and long-term extension (LTE) (NCT03548220/NCT03853798). Patients in the LTE received mitapivat throughout ACTIVATE/LTE (baseline to Week [W] 96; mitapivat-to-mitapivat [M/M] arm) or switched from placebo (baseline to W24) to mitapivat (W24 to 96; placebo-to-mitapivat [P/M] arm). Changes from baseline in markers of iron overload and erythropoiesis were assessed to W96. Improvements in hepcidin (mean [95% confidence interval ⟨CI ⟩] 4770.0 ng/L [-1532.3, 11,072.3], erythroferrone (-9834.9 ng/L [-14,328.4, -5341.3]), soluble transferrin receptor (-56.0 nmol/L [-84.8, -27.2]), and erythropoietin (-32.85 IU/L [-54.65, -11.06]) were observed in the M/M arm (n=40) from baseline to W24, sustained to W96. No improvements were observed in the P/M arm (n=40) to W24; however, upon transitioning to mitapivat, improvements similar to the M/M arm were seen. Mean (95% CI) changes from baseline in liver iron concentration (LIC) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at W96 were -2.0 mg Fe/g dry weight (dw) (-4.8, -0.8; M/M arm) and -1.8 mg Fe/g dw (-4.4, 0.80; P/M arm). Mitapivat is the first disease-modifying pharmacotherapy shown to have beneficial effects on iron overload and ineffective erythropoiesis in patients with PK deficiency.

Editor's Choice
  • Ramachandran M
  • Gupta AK
  • Meena JP
  • Upadhyay AD
  • Coshic P
  • et al.
Am J Blood Res. 2023 Oct 15;13(5):152-161.
POPULATION:

Children with malignancy and chemotherapy-induced high-risk febrile neutropenia (n= 60).

INTERVENTION:

Irradiated buffy-coat derived granulocyte transfusion along with the standard treatment (GT arm, n= 30).

COMPARISON:

Standard treatment, including: antimicrobials, blood component support, and G-CSF as per the protocol (ST arm, n= 30).

OUTCOME:

Baseline characteristics, day-to-defervescence, antibiotic duration, hospital stay, and mortality were comparable between the groups. A significant difference was seen in days to achieve absolute neutrophil count >500/mm(3) in the 2 groups: 4.5 days (3, 6.5) in the GT arm versus 8 days (4, 11) in the ST arm.

BACKGROUND:

Transfusion of granulocytes obtained by apheresis is beneficial in febrile neutropenia (FN) but expensive and time-consuming. Buffy-coat-derived granulocytes could be an alternative. We studied the efficacy and safety of the administration of irradiated buffy-coat-derived granulocytes along with the standard of care in pediatric high-risk (HR) FN.

METHODS:

Sixty children ≤18 years with malignancy and chemotherapy-induced HR FN were randomized to either the granulocyte transfusion (GT) arm which received irradiated buffy-coat derived granulocyte transfusion along with the standard treatment or the standard treatment (ST) arm.

RESULTS:

Baseline characteristics, day-to-defervescence, antibiotic duration, hospital stay, and mortality were comparable between the groups. A significant difference was seen in days to achieve absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >500/mm3 in the 2 groups: 4.5 days (3-6.5) in the GT arm v/s 8 days (4-11) in the ST arm (P=0.01).

CONCLUSION:

Buffy-coat-derived granulocyte transfusion was safe and led to early hematological recovery but was not associated with survival benefits. Future studies with earlier initiation in the intended dose could be undertaken to generate more evidence.