1.
Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review
Sriram S, Hasan S, Alqarni A, Alam T, Kaleem SM, Aziz S, Durrani HK, Ajmal M, Dawasaz AA, Saeed S
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2023;59(4)
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is an autoimmune, mucocutaneous, oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD), which characteristically manifests with chronic, recalcitrant lesions, with frequent flare-ups and remissions. The precise etiopathogenesis of OLP is still debatable, although it is believed to be a T-cell-mediated disorder of an unidentified antigen. Despite the availability of various treatments, no cure for OLP exists due to its recalcitrant nature and idiopathic etiology. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties, in addition to its regulatory action on keratinocyte differentiation and proliferation. These salient properties substantiate the possible role of PRP in the treatment of OLP. Our systematic review focuses on assessing the therapeutic potential of PRP as a treatment modality in OLP. Materials and Methods: We conducted a detailed literature search for studies assessing PRP as a therapeutic regimen in OLP, using the Google Scholar and PubMed/MEDLINE search engines. The search was limited to studies published from January 2000 to January 2023 and included a combination of Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms. ROBVIS analysis was carried out for the assessment of publication bias. Descriptive statistics were performed using Microsoft Excel. Results: This systematic review included five articles that met the inclusion criteria. Most of the included studies demonstrated that PRP treatment considerably ameliorated both objective and subjective symptoms in OLP subjects, with comparable efficacy to the standard corticosteroid treatment. Further, PRP therapy offers the added benefit of minimal adverse effects and recurrences. Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that PRP has significant therapeutic potential for treating OLP. However, further research with larger sample sizes is imperative to corroborate these findings.
2.
Efficacy of autologous whole blood or serum therapy for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Chang HC, Sung CW, Lin MH
The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2019;:1-28
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is chronic wheals without identifiable exogenous stimuli. Autologous whole blood (AWB) injection and autologous serum therapy (AST) are alternative therapies for CSU that induce tolerance to circulating histamine-releasing factors. OBJECTIVE We elucidated currently available evidence for the efficacy and safety of AWB therapy and AST for CSU. METHODS We systematically searched four databases for eligible studies to perform meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the efficacy of AST or AWB therapy, and the secondary outcome was improvement after intervention based on the autologous serum skin test (ASST) status of patients. RESULTS Eight clinical trials, including four randomized controlled trials and 529 CSU patients, were identified. AST was not more effective than the placebo treatment in alleviating CSU symptoms at the end of treatment (P = 0.161), and AWB injection was also not more effective in response rates than the placebo at the end of follow-up (P = 0.099). Furthermore, the efficacy of AST or AWB injection for CSU and the ASST status were not significantly related. No remarkable adverse events were recorded during therapy. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis suggested that AWB therapy and AST are not significantly more effective in alleviating CSU symptoms than the placebo treatment.
3.
Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Patients with Diabetic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Hu, Z., Qu, S., Zhang, J., Cao, X., Wang, P., Huang, S., Shi, F., Dong, Y., Wu, J., Tang, B., et al
Advances in Wound Care. 2019;8(7):298-308
Abstract
Significance: Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been suggested to be effective for wound healing. However, clinical evidence for its use in patients with diabetic ulcer remains inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP in patients with diabetic ulcer. Recent Advances: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge databases. Results were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcome of the study was the healing rate of ulcers in patients with PRP, when compared with controls. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of ulcer area reduction, recurrence rate, and amputation rate. Critical Issues: Eight RCTs that involved 431 participants were included. Compared with controls, PRP was associated with a significantly increased ratio of complete ulcer healing (odds ratio [OR] = 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.91-7.45, I(2) (=) 42.2%) and reduced areas of ulcers (standard mean difference = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.27-1.45, I(2) (=) 0.0%). No differences were observed between patients allocated to PRP or controls, in terms of the outcomes of recurrence rate (OR = 3.32, 95% CI = 0.41-27.18, I(2) (=) 66.3%) or amputation rate (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.15-1.28). The results of the trial sequence analyses revealed that the cumulative Z-curve crossed both the traditional boundary (p = 0.05) and trial sequential monitoring boundary. Future Directions: Our findings suggest that PRP may improve ulcer healing without significant adverse effects for patients with diabetic ulcers.
4.
Topical application of platelet-rich plasma for diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review
Hirase T, Ruff E, Surani S, Ratnani I
World Journal of Diabetes. 2018;9((10)):172-179.
Abstract
AIM: To determine if topical application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) results in superior healing rates. METHODS A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed using PRISMA guidelines. Level I-IV investigations of topical PRP application in DFUs were sought in multiple databases including: MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search terms used were "platelet rich plasma", "diabetes", "ulcers", and "wound". The Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS) was used to analyze study methodological quality. Study heterogeneity and a mostly non-comparative nature of evidence precluded meta-analysis. Only the outcome measurements used by more than 50% of the studies were included in the data synthesis to increase power of the measurement over that of individual studies. A weighted mean of healing rate per week between PRP group vs controls were compared using two-sample z-tests using P-value of less than 0.05 for significance. RESULTS One thousand two hundred and seventeen articles were screened. Eleven articles (322 PRP subjects, 126 controls, PRP subject mean age 58.4 +/- 7.2 years, control mean age 58.7 +/- 5.9 years) were analyzed. Six articles were level II evidence, four were level III, and one article was level IV. The mean MCMS was 61.8 +/- 7.3. Healing rate was significantly faster with PRP application compared to controls (0.68 +/- 0.56 cm(2)/wk vs 0.39 +/- 0.09 cm(2)/wk; P < 0.001). Mean heal time to > 90% of the original ulcer area was 7.8 +/- 2.7 wk and 8.3 +/- 3.7 wk for patients in the PRP group and control groups, respectively (P = 0.115). There were significantly lower adverse effects reported with PRP application compared to controls (7 wound infections, 1 contact dermatitis vs 14 wound infections, 1 maceration; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The topical application of PRP for DFUs results in statistically superior healing rates and lower complication rates compared to controls.
