-
1.
Regional Variation of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Hyporesponsiveness in the Global Daprodustat Dialysis Study (ASCEND-D)
Macdougall IC, Meadowcroft AM, Blackorby A, Cizman B, Cobitz AR, Godoy S, Jha V, Johansen KL, McMahon G, Obrador GT, et al
American journal of nephrology. 2023
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) affects 10-15% of the chronic dialysis population. We explored baseline characteristics and predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness in a global randomized cardiovascular outcomes study comparing an investigational hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI), daprodustat, with conventional ESA treatment. METHODS ASCEND-D (NCT02879305) recruited 2964 chronic dialysis patients receiving ESA treatment (standardized to weekly intravenous [IV] epoetin) who were iron replete at baseline. The primary ESA hyporesponsiveness definition was an ESA Resistance Index (ERI, ESA Units/kg/week/hemoglobin g/l) ≥2 or IV standardized ESA dose ≥450 Units/kg/week. Predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness were determined using a multivariable regression model. Alternative hyporesponder definitions were explored. RESULTS Using the primary definition, 354 (12%) patients were ESA hyporesponsive. Geographic region, notably Latin America, lower baseline body mass index and transferrin saturation, younger age, lower albumin concentration, and a higher baseline IV iron dose were identified as strongly associated (P < 0.001) with ESA hyporesponsiveness. Additional predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness included female sex (P = 0.010), history of heart failure (P = 0.035), longer dialysis vintage (P = 0.077), smoking status (P = 0.247), aspirin use (P = 0.121), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/ angiotensin receptor blocker use (P = 0.214). CONCLUSION This is the first global HIF-PHI study to report pre-specified definitions and predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness. While most of the predictors identified in our study have been previously reported, geographic region stands out as an unexpected finding, meriting further investigation.
-
2.
Safety of Roxadustat Versus Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Patients with Anemia of Non-dialysis-Dependent or Incident-to-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies
Barratt J, Dellanna F, Portoles J, Choukroun G, De Nicola L, Young J, Dimković N, Reusch M
Advances in therapy. 2023
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of roxadustat, an oral medication, in patients with non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) or incident dialysis dialysis-dependent (ID-DD) chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS Safety results from four phase 3, randomized, open-label studies comparing roxadustat to an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) in men and women with NDD or ID-DD CKD with anemia were pooled and evaluated. Endpoints were time to major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality) and MACE+ (MACE plus congestive heart failure or unstable angina requiring hospitalization), all-cause mortality, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). MACE and MACE+ were evaluated for non-inferiority at 1.8- and 1.3-margins using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). TEAEs were descriptively summarized. RESULTS In total, 2142 patients were evaluated (1083 roxadustat; 1059 ESA). Roxadustat was comparable to ESA for risk of MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.02), MACE+ (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57-1.05). TEAEs were comparable between roxadustat and ESA groups, including any TEAE [incidence rate per 100 (IR/100) patient-exposure years 56.1 vs. 53.5], TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation (IR/100 patient-exposure years 6.7 vs. 5.1), and TEAEs leading to death (IR/100 patient-exposure years 6.9 vs. 7.4). CONCLUSION There was no evidence of increased risk of cardiovascular events or mortality with roxadustat compared with ESA in patients with anemia who have NDD or ID-DD CKD. Although TEAEs occurred commonly in both the roxadustat and ESA groups, patients infrequently discontinued the study drug because of an adverse event. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS DOLOMITES, 1517-CL-0610 [NCT02021318]; HIMALAYAS, FGCL-4592-063 [NCT02052310]; SIERRAS, FGCL-4592-064 [NCT02273726]; and ROCKIES, D5740C00002 [NCT02174731].
-
3.
Erythropoietic effects of vadadustat in patients with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease
Koury MJ, Agarwal R, Chertow GM, Eckardt KU, Fishbane S, Ganz T, Haase VH, Hanudel MR, Parfrey PS, Pergola PE, et al
American journal of hematology. 2022
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease develop anemia largely because of inappropriately low erythropoietin production and insufficient iron available to erythroid precursors. In four phase 3, randomized, open-label, clinical trials in dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia, the hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, vadadustat, was non-inferior to the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, darbepoetin alfa, in increasing and maintaining target hemoglobin concentrations. In these trials, vadadustat increased the concentrations of serum erythropoietin, the numbers of circulating erythrocytes, and the numbers of circulating reticulocytes. Achieved hemoglobin concentrations were similar in patients treated with either vadadustat or darbepoetin alfa, but compared with patients receiving darbepoetin alfa, those receiving vadadustat had erythrocytes with increased mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin, while the red cell distribution width was decreased. Increased serum transferrin concentrations, as measured by total iron-binding capacity, combined with stable serum iron concentrations, resulted in decreased transferrin saturation in patients randomized to vadadustat compared with patients randomized to darbepoetin alfa. The decreases in transferrin saturation were associated with relatively greater declines in serum hepcidin and ferritin in patients receiving vadadustat compared with those receiving darbepoetin alfa. These results for serum transferrin saturation, hepcidin, ferritin, and erythrocyte indices were consistent with improved iron availability in the patients receiving vadadustat. Thus, overall, vadadustat had beneficial effects on three aspects of erythropoiesis in patients with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease: increased endogenous erythropoietin production, improved iron availability to erythroid cells, and increased reticulocytes in the circulation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
-
4.
Darbepoetin alfa injection versus epoetin alfa injection for treating anemia of Chinese hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney failure: A randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority Phase III trail
Chen N, Xing C, Niu J, Liu B, Fu J, Zhao J, Ni Z, Wang M, Liu W, Zhao J, et al
Chronic diseases and translational medicine. 2022;8(1):59-70
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erythropoietin is a glycoprotein that mainly regulates erythropoiesis. In patients with chronic renal failure with anemia, darbepoetin alfa can stimulate erythropoiesis, correct anemia, and maintain hemoglobin levels. This study was designed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa injections as being not inferior to epoetin alfa injections (Recombinant Human Erythropoietin injection, rHuEPO) when maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) levels within the target range (10.0-12.0 g/dL) for the treatment of renal anemia. METHODS Ninety-five patients were enrolled in this study from April 15, 2013 to April 10, 2014 at 25 sites. In this study, patients (n = 95) aged 18-70 years were randomized into a once per week intravenous darbepoetin alfa group (n = 56) and a twice or three times per week intravenous epoetin alfa group (n = 39) for 28 weeks, who had anemia with hemoglobin levels between 6 g/dL and 10 g/dL due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and were undergoing hemodialysis or hemofiltration with ESA-naive (erythropoiesis stimulating agent-naive). The primary efficacy profile was the mean Hb level (the non-inferiority margin was -1.0 g/dL, week 21-28); the secondary efficacy profiles were the Hb increase rate (week 0-4), the target Hb achievement cumulative rate and time, the change trends of the Hb levels, and the target Hb maintenance ratio. Adverse events (AEs) were observed and compared, and the efficacy and safety were analyzed between the two treatment groups. Additionally, the frequencies of dose adjustments between the darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa groups were compared during the treatment period. SAS® software version 9.2 was used to perform all statistical analyses. Descriptive statistics were used for all efficacy, safety, and demographic variable analyses, including for the primary efficacy indicators. RESULTS The mean Hb level was 11.3 g/dL in the darbepoetin alfa group and 10.7 g/dL in the epoetin alfa group, respectively; the difference of the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (CI) between the two groups was 0.1 g/dL (>-1.0 g/dL), and non-inferiority was proven; the Hb levels started to increase in the first four weeks at a similar increase rate; no obvious differences were observed between the groups in the target Hb achievement cumulative rates, and the Hb levels as well as the target Hb level maintenance rate changed over time. The incidence of AEs was 62.5% in the darbepoetin alfa group and 76.9% in the epoetin alfa group. All the adverse events observed in the study were those commonly associated with hemodialysis. CONCLUSION Darbepoetin alfa intravenously once per week can effectively increase Hb levels and maintain the target Hb levels well, which makes it not inferior to epoetin alfa intravenously twice or three times per week. Darbepoetin alfa shows an efficacy and safety comparable to epoetin alfa for the treatment of renal anemia.
-
5.
An Analysis of Vascular Access Thrombosis Events From the Proactive IV irOn Therapy in hemodiALysis Patients Trial
Thomson PC, Mark PB, Robertson M, White C, Anker SD, Bhandari S, Farrington K, Jardine AG, Kalra PA, McMurray J, et al
Kidney international reports. 2022;7(8):1793-1801
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment of anemia in dialysis patients has been associated with increased risk of vascular access thrombosis (VAT). Proactive IV irOn Therapy in hemodiALysis Patients (PIVOTAL) was a clinical trial of proactive compared with reactive i.v. iron therapy in patients requiring hemodialysis. We analyzed the trial data to determine whether randomized treatment arm, alongside other clinical and laboratory variables, independently associated with VAT. METHODS In PIVOTAL, 2141 adult patients were randomized. The type of vascular access (arteriovenous fistula [AVF], arteriovenous graft [AVG], or central venous catheter [CVC]) was recorded at baseline and every month after randomization. The associations between clinical and laboratory data and first VAT were evaluated in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 480 (22.4%) participants experienced VAT in a median of 2.1 years of follow-up. In multivariable analyses, treatment arm (proactive vs. reactive) was not an independent predictor of VAT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, P = 0.18). Diabetic kidney disease (HR 1.45, P < 0.001), AVG use (HR 2.29, P < 0.001), digoxin use (HR 2.48, P < 0.001), diuretic use (HR 1.25, P = 0.02), female sex (HR 1.33, P = 0.002), and previous/current smoker (HR 1.47, P = 0.004) were independently associated with a higher risk of VAT. Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use (HR 0.66, P = 0.01) was independently associated with a lower risk of VAT. CONCLUSION In PIVOTAL, VAT occurred in nearly 1 quarter of participants in a median of just >2 years. In this post hoc analysis, randomization to proactive i.v. iron treatment arms did not increase the risk of VAT.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients requiring haemodialysis enrolled in the PIVOTAL trial, in 50 sites across the UK (n= 2,141).
Intervention
High-dose of intravenous iron administered proactively (n= 1,093).
Comparison
Low-dose of intravenous iron administered reactively (n= 1,048).
Outcome
The associations between clinical and laboratory data and first vascular access thrombosis (VAT) were evaluated. A total of 480 (22.4%) participants experienced VAT in a median of 2.1 years of follow-up. In multivariable analyses, treatment arm (proactive vs. reactive) was not an independent predictor of VAT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13). Diabetic kidney disease (HR 1.45), arteriovenous graft (AVG) use (HR 2.29), digoxin use (HR 2.48), diuretic use (HR 1.25), female sex (HR 1.33), and previous/current smoker (HR 1.47) were independently associated with a higher risk of VAT. Angiotensin receptor blocker use (HR 0.66) was independently associated with a lower risk of VAT.
-
6.
Two Phase 3 Studies on Ophthalmologic Effects of Roxadustat Versus Darbepoetin
Sepah YJ, Nguyen QD, Yamaguchi Y, Otsuka T, Majikawa Y, Reusch M, Akizawa T
Kidney international reports. 2022;7(4):763-775
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Roxadustat is an orally administered hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that represents a novel therapeutic option for patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS Conducted in Japan, CL-0307 (NCT02952092) and CL-310 (NCT02988973) were phase 3, darbepoetin alfa (DA)-controlled studies conducted in dialysis-dependent (DD) and non-DD (NDD) patients with CKD, respectively, where patients were randomized to receive roxadustat or DA. Ophthalmic imaging and assessments of visual acuity were performed up to week 24 or at study discontinuation. Ophthalmic imaging was centrally evaluated by independent readers masked to the study treatment. RESULTS In CL-0307, 302 patients (roxadustat, n = 150; DA, n = 152) received ≥1 dose of the study drug and were included in this analysis. In CL-0310, 262 patients (roxadustat, n = 131; DA, n = 131) received ≥1 dose of the study drug and were included in this analysis. Proportions of DD patients with new or worsening retinal hemorrhages (RHs) in the roxadustat group and DA group were 32.4% (46 of 142) and 36.6% (53 of 145), respectively. Proportions of NDD patients with CKD with new or worsening RH in the roxadustat and DA groups were 31.4% (38 of 121) and 39.8% (51 of 128), respectively. Similar trends were apparent in subgroup analyses: patients with/without RH at baseline and with/without diabetes mellitus at baseline. In both studies, there were no differences in retinal thickness, visual acuity, presence of hard exudates or cotton wool spots, or presence of intra- and subretinal fluid between groups, at any given time point. CONCLUSION In these studies, roxadustat, compared with DA, was not associated with an increased risk of adverse ophthalmologic events in these cohorts.
-
7.
Efficacy and Safety of Daprodustat Vs rhEPO for Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Fu Z, Geng X, Chi K, Song C, Wu D, Liu C, Hong Q
Frontiers in pharmacology. 2022;13:746265
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Introduction: Daprodustat, a novel hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI), its efficacy and safety remain unclear. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis aiming at investigating its efficacy and safety on the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related anemia. Methods: We systematically searched for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinical Trial Registries databases from inception until December 2021. We selected randomized controlled trials comparing daprodustat with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in anemia patients with CKD with or without dialysis. Results: Seven studies including 7933 patients met the inclusion criteria. For both nondialysis-dependent (NDD-) CKD and dialysis-dependent (DD-) CKD patients, the pooled results showed that there was no significant difference in the changes in hemoglobin levels between the daprodustat and rhEPO groups (mean difference (MD) = -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.38, 0.35, p = 0.95; MD = 0.15, 95% CI = -0.29, 0.60, p = 0.50; respectively). In addition, a significant increase in transferrin saturation (TSAT), total iron binding capacity (TIBC) and total iron was observed in daprodustat groups compared with rhEPO groups in DD-CKD patients (p < 0.05). As for safety, the overall frequency of adverse events was similar between the daprodustat and rhEPO groups in DD-CKD patients (relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.92, 1.06, p = 0.76), and the trial sequential analysis (TSA) confirmed this result. But for NDD-CKD patients, the incidence of adverse events in the daprodustat groups was significantly higher than that of rhEPO groups (RR = 1.04, 95%CI = 1.01,1.07, p = 0.02), while the TSA corrected this result. No trend of increasing incidence of serious adverse events was found in all daprodustat treated patients, but the TSA could not confirm this result. Conclusion: Although daprodustat was noninferior to rhEPO in correcting anemia in both NDD-CKD and DD-CKD patients, it seemed to have a better effect on optimizing iron metabolism in DD-CKD patients. Daprodustat may be a promising alternative for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD. However, due to the lack of included studies, future researches are needed to further evaluate the therapeutic effect of daprodustat. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021229636.
PICO Summary
Population
People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without dialysis, suffering from anaemia and participating in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), (n= 7,933, 7 RCTs).
Intervention
Various doses of daprodustat.
Comparison
Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO).
Outcome
For both nondialysis-dependent (NDD-) CKD and dialysis-dependent (DD-) CKD patients, the pooled results showed that there was no significant difference in the changes in haemoglobin levels between the daprodustat and rhEPO groups (mean difference (MD)= -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI)= -0.38, 0.35; MD= 0.15, 95% CI= -0.29, 0.60; respectively). In addition, a significant increase in transferrin saturation, total iron binding capacity and total iron was observed in daprodustat groups compared with rhEPO groups in DD-CKD patients. As for safety, the overall frequency of adverse events was similar between the daprodustat and rhEPO groups in DD-CKD patients (relative risk (RR)= 0.99, 95% CI= 0.92, 1.06), and the trial sequential analysis (TSA) confirmed this result. But for NDD-CKD patients, the incidence of adverse events in the daprodustat groups was significantly higher than that of rhEPO groups (RR= 1.04, 95% CI= 1.01,1.07), while the TSA corrected this result. No trend of increasing incidence of serious adverse events was found in all daprodustat treated patients, but the TSA could not confirm this result.
-
8.
Efficacy and safety of vadadustat compared to darbepoetin alfa on anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis
Huang Q, Liao Z, Liu X, Xia Y, Wang J
International urology and nephrology. 2022
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As a novel oral agent in treating anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD), several clinical trials of vadadustat have been conducted to compare with darbepoetin alfa. This study systematically reviews and investigates the efficacy and safety of vadadustat in the anemia treatment with different duration in both nondialysis-dependent CKD (NDD-CKD) and dialysis-dependent CKD (DD-CKD). METHODS Several main databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting vadadustat vs darbepoetin alfa for anemia patients with CKD. The outcome indicators were focused on hemoglobin (Hb), the percentage of patients within the target Hb, the need for RBC (Red Blood Cell) transfusions, and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS Four eligible studies with 8,026 participants were included. The changes of Hb levels from the baseline in the darbepoetin alfa group were significantly higher than that in the vadadustat group with DD-CKD (mean difference (MD) - 0.19, [95% confidence interval (CI), - 0.21 to - 0.17], p < 0.0001). In NDD-CKD patients, the changes of Hb levels in the two groups are not significantly different (MD = - 0.06, [95% CI, - 0.18 to 0.05], p = 0.006), especially, during the treatment duration of 20-36 weeks (MD = 0.02, [95% CI, - 0.04 to 0.08], p = 0.51). The percentage of patients within the target Hb was significantly lower in the vadadustat group than that in the darbepoetin alfa group in DD-CKD patients (MD = 0.9, [95% CI, 0.86 to 0.94], p < 0.00001), while in NDD-CKD patients, there was no significant difference (MD = 1.05, [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.12], p < 0.00001). In terms of safety, the two agents had no significant difference in the incidence of RBC transfusions and SAEs (RR = 1.26 [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.61], p = 0.52; RR = 0.97, [95% CI, 0.94 to 1.01], p = 0.19; respectively). CONCLUSION Compared to darbepoetin alfa, vadadustat had the same effect in raising the hemoglobin level in NDD-CKD patients in the short term. Vadadustat may become an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of patients with anemia and CKD, especially in NDD-CKD patients. As the application of vadadustat is still under exploration, future research should compensate for the limitations of our study to estimate the vadadustat's value.
-
9.
Comparison of darbepoetin alpha and recombinant human erythropoietin for treatment of anemia in pediatric chronic kidney disease: a non-inferiority trial from India
Mazahir R, Anand K, Pruthi PK
European journal of pediatrics. 2022
Abstract
To determine whether or not Darbepoetin alpha (DA) was non-inferior to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in the treatment of anemia in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 (on or not on dialysis). This was a randomized, open-label, two-arm, parallel group, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted at a tertiary care center in New Delhi, India. Fifty patients of either gender (aged 1-18 years) with CKD stage 3-5 (on or not on dialysis) who had baseline hemoglobin (Hb) between 9 and 12 g/dL and were on stable erythropoietin therapy for at least 8 weeks were randomized (1:1) to either continue rHuEPO or switch to DA therapy for a period of 28 weeks. Doses were titrated in the initial 23 weeks to maintain the Hb between 11 and 12 g/dL, and efficacy was assessed between weeks 24 and 28. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean change in Hb between baseline and the evaluation period. In the intention-to-treat population (n = 50), the adjusted between-group difference in mean Hb change between the baseline and the evaluation period was 0.131 g/dL (95% CI: - 0.439 to 0.719, p = 0.629). The lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference in the mean change in Hb between the two treatment groups was well above the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of - 1.0 g/dL. Similar pattern of non-inferiority was seen for per protocol population. The safety profile of DA and rHuEPO was also comparable (injection site pain:rHuEPO-3, DA-7; p-0.296). Conclusion: DA is non-inferior to rHuEPO for the treatment of anemia of CKD (stage 3-5) in pediatric population with a comparable safety profile. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04959578 (retrospectively registered), Date: July 13, 2021. What is Known: • Limited studies showing darbepoetin alpha is effective in children as an erythropoiesis stimulating agent. • No RCT from Indian subcontinent addressing this topic. What is New: • Darbepoetin alpha is non inferior to recombinant human erythropoietin for treatment of anemia in children with CKD stage 3-5 (on or not on dialysis) with safety comparable to recombinant human erythropoietin. • A cost reduction of approximately 8.6% per patient by shifting to darbepoetin alpha.
-
10.
Risk of infection in roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Chong S, Xie Q, Ma T, Xiang Q, Zhou Y, Cui Y
Frontiers in pharmacology. 2022;13:967532
Abstract
Background: Many studies demonstrated that roxadustat (FG-4592) could increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels effectively in anemia patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, its safety remains controversial. This study aims to explore the risk of infection for CKD patients treated with roxadustat, especially focused on sepsis. Methods: We thoroughly searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with roxadustat versus erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) or placebo in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, European Union Clinical Trials Register. Both on and not on dialysis anemia patients with CKD were included. Primary outcomes contained the incidence rates of sepsis. Secondary outcomes included infection-related consequences (septic shock and other infection events), general safety outcomes [all-cause mortality, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs)] and iron parameters. Moreover, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to assess if the results were supposed to be a robust conclusion. Results: Eighteen RCTs (n = 11,305) were included. Overall, the incidence of sepsis (RR: 2.42, 95% CI [1.50, 3.89], p = 0.0003) and cellulitis (RR: 2.07, 95% CI [1.24, 3.44], p = 0.005) were increased in the roxadustat group compared with placebo group. In non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD patients, the incidence of cellulitis (RR 2.01, 95% CI [1.23, 3.28], p = 0.005) was significantly higher in roxadustat group than that in the ESAs or placebo group. Both groups showed similar results in the incidence of septic shock (RR 1.29, 95% CI [0.86, 1.94], p = 0.22). A significant increased risk of all-cause mortality [risk ratios (RR): 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.05, 1.26], p = 0.002] was found in roxadustat treatment, and TSA confirmed the result. Compared with ESAs or placebo, both the incident rates of TEAEs (RR:1.03, 95% CI [1.01, 1.04], p = 0.008) and TESAEs (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.02, 1.11], p = 0.002) were significantly increased in roxadustat group. As for iron parameters, changes from baseline (Δ) of hepcidin (MD: -26.46, 95% CI [-39.83, -13.09], p = 0.0001), Δ ferritin and Δ TSAT were remarkably lower in the roxadustat group, while Δ Hb, Δ iron and Δ TIBC increased significantly versus those in ESAs or placebo group. Conclusion: We found evidence that incidence rates of sepsis and cellulitis are higher in roxadustat group compared with placebo. This may be the result of improved iron homeostasis. The risk of all-cause mortality, TEAEs and TESAEs in CKD patients also increased in patients treated with roxadustat. We need more clinical and mechanistic studies to confirm whether roxadustat really causes infection.
