Meta-analysis comparing autologous blood-derived products (including platelet-rich plasma) injection versus placebo in patients with achilles tendinopathy
Arthroscopy : the Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery : Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2018;34((6):):1966-1975 e5
PURPOSE To compare the effectiveness of autologous blood-derived products (ABP) injection with that of placebo (sham injection, no injection, or physiotherapy alone) in patients with Achilles tendinopathy. METHODS Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to June 2017. All published or unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Two independent raters assessed the risk of bias of RCTs with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The primary outcome was Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were used for random effect meta-analysis. RESULTS Seven RCTs were enrolled in meta-analysis. The ABP injection and placebo revealed equal effectiveness in VISA-A score improvement at 4 to 6 weeks (short term, WMD 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.69, 6.27), 12 weeks (medium term, WMD 2.63, 95% CI: -1.72, 6.98), 24 weeks (long term, WMD 4.61, 95% CI: -1.25, 10.47), and 48 weeks (very long term, WMD 4.16, 95% CI: -6.82, 15.14). In meta-regression, there was no association between change in VISA-A score and duration of symptoms at 4 to 6 weeks (short term), 12 weeks (medium term), and 24 weeks (long term). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis revealed that ABP injection was not more effective than placebo (sham injection, no injection, or physiotherapy alone) in Achilles tendinopathy and that no association was found between therapeutic effects and duration of symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I, meta-analysis of Level I studies.
No benefit of autologous transfusion drains in total knee arthroplasty
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy : Official Journal of the Esska. 2017;26((5):):1557-1563
PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS Autologous blood transfusion drains are commonly used to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion rate after total knee arthroplasty. There is conflicting evidence as to whether autologous transfusion drains (ABT drains) were effective when restrictive transfusion triggers were used. The aim of our study was to ascertain where, as a part of a blood management protocol, autologous blood transfusion drains reduce the allogeneic blood transfusion rate after total knee arthroplasty. METHODS Two-hundred total knee arthroplasty patients were included in the prospective randomized controlled study. After implantation, a Redon drain without vacuum assistance (control, n = 100) or an autologous blood transfusion drain (ABT group, n = 100) was used. Demographic and operative data were collected. The blood loss, total blood loss, blood values and transfusion rate were documented. RESULTS The blood loss in the drains was significantly increased for the ABT group (409 vs. 297 ml, p < 0.001). There was a non-significant trend towards a higher total blood loss for ABT patients (1844 vs. 1685 ml, n.s.). The allogeneic blood transfusion rate was similar for both groups (8 vs. 9%, n.s.). Similarly, the number of transfused blood units was comparable between both groups (0.2U/patient vs. 0.17U/patient n.s.). CONCLUSION In combination with restrictive blood transfusion triggers, ABT drains had no positive effect on the allogeneic blood transfusion rate. The blood loss in ABT drains was higher. As a consequence, the use of ABT drains was discontinued. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I.
Review: Autologous blood transfusion drainage compared with no drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.. 2017;30((6)):2321-2327.
This is the first meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficiency, safety and potential advantages regarding the use of ABT drains compared with no drainage which is controversial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).A comprehensive literature search was carried out in March 2015 using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. A metaanalysis was carried out on two retrospective comparative studies (RCSs) and five randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The number of patients receiving homologous blood transfusion was the primary outcome of the meta-analysis; the secondary outcome measure was the mean drop in Hb level in comparison to the mean pre-operative HB level, the range of flexion of the knee joint, and infections of the wound after surgery. A total of 868 patients, who were included in two retrospective studies and five RCTs, were distributed into subgroups for the meta-analysis. This pooled data showed no benefit of ABT drainage compared no drainage in the homologous blood transfusion rate (13.05% and 16.91%, OR:0.73[0.47,1.13], Z=1.41, P=0.016; and 3.49% and 6.54%, OR: 0.50[0.12,2.01], Z=0.98,P=0.033,respectively in subgroups), Hb drop (Weight mean differences (WMD): 0.20[-0.28,0.68], Z=0.82, P=0.41; WMD:0.16[-0.41,0.55], Z=0.93, P=0.35, respectively), range of flexion of the knee joint (WMD:-0.82 [-3.35,1.70], Z =0.64,P=0.52)and wound infection (OR:0.25[0.61,10.20]; Z =1.28, p=0.2) after TKA surgery. Our findings do not recommend the routine use of postoperative ABT drainage in total knee arthroplasty. Well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes, longer term measures and extensive follow-up period should be performed in the future to update the findings of this study.
Comparison between autologous blood transfusion drainage and closed-suction drainage/no drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016;17((1)):142.
BACKGROUND Autologous blood transfusion (ABT) drainage system is a new unwashed salvaged blood retransfusion system for total knee replacement (TKA). However, whether to use ABT drainage, closed-suction (CS) drainage or no drainage in TKA surgery remains controversial. This is the first meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficiency, safety and potential advantages regarding the use of ABT drains compared with closed-suction/no drainage. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched in March 2015. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and pooled for statistical analysis. The primary outcome evaluated was homologous blood transfusion rate. The secondary outcomes were post-operative haemoglobin on days 3-5, length of hospital stay and wound infections after TKA surgery. RESULTS The pooled data included 1,721 patients and showed that patients in the ABT drainage group might benefit from lower blood transfusion rates (16.59 % and 37.47 %, OR: 0.28 [0.14, 0.55]; 13.05 % and 16.91 %, OR: 0.73 [0.47,1.13], respectively). Autologous blood transfusion drainage and closed-suction drainage/no drainage have similar clinical efficacy and safety with regard to post-operative haemoglobin on days 3-5, length of hospital stay and wound infections. CONCLUSIONS Autologous blood transfusion drainage offers a safe and efficient alternative to CS/no drainage with a lower blood transfusion rate. Future large-volume high-quality RCTs with extensive follow-up will affirm and update this system review.
The efficacy and safety of postoperative retransfusion drain following total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Surgery]. 2016;54((2)):108-13.
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effectiveness and safety of post-operative retransfusion drain(PRD) after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS A systematic literature review based on PubMed, EMBase, the Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Database in any language regarding PRD following total hip arthroplasty was performed.The data was evaluated using modified Jadad score and then analyzed using RevMan 5.2. RESULTS Nine randomized controlled trials totaling 1 824 patients, 913 patients in PRD group and 911 in control group, were eligible for data extraction and Meta-analysis.The results indicated that the use of PRD could reduce the requirement of allogeneic blood transfusion when compared with ordinary vacuum drainage (RR=0.61, 95% CI= 0.47-0.79), but the benefit was not found when compared with no drainage group(RR=1.07, 95% CI=0.67-1.71). And the postoperative hemoglobin level was higher in PRD group(MD=0.14, 95% CI=0.01-0.27, P=0.04). No significant difference was identified regarding transfusion index, length of hospital stay, the incidence of febrile reaction and wound-related complications. CONCLUSIONS PRD in reducing requirement of blood transfusion following THA is effective and safe when compared with ordinary vacuum drainage, but the benefit is not found when compared with no drainage.And more robust evidence is needed to confirm this result.
Post-operative retransfusion of unwashed filtered shed blood reduces allogenic blood demand in hip hemiarthroplasty in traumatic femoral neck fractures-a prospective randomized trial
International Orthopaedics. 2016;40((12):):2575-2579
PURPOSE Patients who undergo hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) due to traumatic femoral neck fracture frequently require red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Although post-operative autologous blood transfusion (ABT) is well established in elective arthroplasty, its role in trauma patients remains unclear. METHODS Two hundred twenty-nine patients with a traumatic femoral neck fracture that underwent HHA at our level-I trauma centre between 2005 and 2009 were prospectively randomized to a high-vacuum drainage or an ABT device. In this single-institution analysis, the number of RBC units as well as the amount of retransfused shed blood were recorded and compared according to study groups. Additionally, the significance of confounding factors for allogenic blood demand such as age, gender, pre-operative Hb level, surgical approach, type of prosthesis and amount of intra-operative RBC units were evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS One hundred thirty-five patients were randomized in the high-vacuum group while 94 patients received an ABT device. Intention to treat analysis revealed no significant difference in post-operative RBC demand (ABT: 0.87 RBC, high-vacuum drainage: 1.01 RBC; P = 0.374). However, patients that actually received retransfusion (N = 35) had a reduced post-operative RBC demand (0.49 RBC units, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION While only one third of trauma patients treated with an ABT device during HHA actually receive retransfusion, retransfused patients seem to significantly benefit from this treatment as reflected by a reduced pos-toperative RBC demand.
The efficacy and safety of autologous blood transfusion drainage in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials
Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016;17((1)):452.
BACKGROUND Autologous blood transfusion drainage (ABTD) has been used for many years to reduce blood loss in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluate the current evidence concerning the efficiency and safety of ABTD used in TKA compared with conventional suction drainage (CSD). METHODS We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and four Chinese databases. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of ABTD versus CSD in TKA were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS Sixteen RCTs involving 1534 patients who compared the effects of ABTD versus CSD were included. Five of the RCTs were performed in Asia, ten in Europe, and one in North America. Patients in the ABTD group had a lower blood transfusion rate (OR: 0.25 [0.13, 0.47]; Z = 4.27, P < 0.0001) and fewer units transfused per patient (WMD: -0.68 [-0.98, -0.39]; Z = 4. 52, P < 0.00001) than did patients in the CSD group. Wound complications, deep vein thrombosis, febrile complications, post-operative hemoglobin days 5-8, drainage volume, and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two types of drainage systems. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that ABTD is a safe and effective method that yields a lower blood transfusion rate and fewer units transfused per patient in TKA compared with CSD.
Postoperative autotransfusion drain after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Scientific Reports. 2016;6:27461.
The use of a postoperative autotransfusion drain (PATD) to reduce allogenic blood transfusions in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Thirteen RCTs (1,424 participants) were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that PATD reduced the rate of allogenic transfusions (RR = 0.56; 95% CI [0.40, 0.77]) and total blood loss (MD = -196.04; 95% CI [-311.01, -81.07]). Haemoglobin (Hb) levels were higher in the PATD group on postoperative day 1 (MD = 0.28; 95% CI [0.06, 0.49]), but no significant differences on postoperative days 2 or 3 (MD = 0.29; 95% CI [-0.02, 0.60]; MD = 0.26; 95% CI [-0.04, 0.56]; respectively). There were no differences in length of hospital stay (MD = -0.18; 95% CI [-0.61, 0.25]), febrile reaction (RR = 1.26; 95% CI [0.95, 1.67]), infection (RR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.54, 1.65]), wound problems (RR = 1.07; 95% CI [0.87, 1.33]), or serious adverse events (RR = 0.59; 95% CI [0.10, 3.58]). Our findings suggest that PATD is effective in reducing the rate of allogenic transfusion. However, the included studies are inadequately powered to conclusively determine the safety of this technique.
Do autologous blood transfusion systems reduce allogeneic blood transfusion in total knee arthroplasty?
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy : Official Journal of the Esska. 2016;25((9):):2957-2966
PURPOSE To study whether autologus blood transfusion systems reduce the requirement of allogneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. METHODS A comprehensive search of the published literature with PubMed, Scopus and Science direct database was performed. The following search terms were used: (total knee replacement) OR (total knee arthroplasty) OR (TKA) AND (blood transfusion) OR (autologous transfusion) OR (autologous transfusion system). Using search syntax, a total of 748 search results were obtained (79 from PubMed, 586 from Science direct and 83 from Scopus). Twenty-one randomized control trials were included for this meta-analysis. RESULTS The allogenic transfusion rate in autologus blood transfusion (study) group was significantly lower than the control group (28.4 and 53.5 %, respectively) (p value 0.0001, Relative risk: 0.5). The median units of allogenic blood transfused in study control group and control group were 0.1 (0.1-3.0) and 1.3 (0.3-2.6), respectively. The median hospital stay in study group was 9 (6.7-15.6) days and control group was 8.7 (6.6-16.7) days. The median cost incurred for blood transfusion per patient in study and control groups was 175 (85.7-260) and 254.7 (235-300) euros, respectively. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis demonstrates that the use of auto-transfusion systems is a cost-effective method to reduce the need for and quantity of allogenic transfusion in elective total knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I.
Impact of postoperative drainage autologous blood re-transfusion on the coagulation parameters and D-dimer levels of patients after total hip arthroplasty
Transfusion and Apheresis Science : Official Journal of the World Apheresis Association : Official Journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis. 2016;55((1):):109-13
BACKGROUND Postoperative drainage autologous blood re-transfusion (ABT) is an important treatment method that maintains a high haemoglobin (HGB) content and obviates the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in patients after surgery. However, the safety of ABT remains controversial. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS This study aimed to investigate the safety of postoperative drainage ABT in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this randomized, controlled study, patients undergoing THA were selected and randomly divided into two groups. A device for postoperative ABT was used for the 49 patients in the ABT group, whereas conventional postoperative vacuum drainage was used for the 42 patients in the drainage blood (Drain) group without ABT. The coagulation parameters and D-dimer (DD) levels of the two groups of patients were recorded before surgery (T0) and on postoperative days one (T1), three (T2), seven (T3), and 14 (T4). RESULTS A within-group comparison after THA showed that the postoperative fibrinogen (FIB) and DD levels were higher than those before surgery in both groups (P < 0.01). A between-group comparison showed that, at different time points, the postoperative drainage blood amount and the coagulation parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with the Drain group, the DD levels in the ABT group were significantly higher at T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Postoperative drainage ABT did not significantly impact the coagulation parameters of patients after THA. However, the DD levels after ABT significantly increased, which may affect the risk of thrombosis.