-
1.
Comparison of suture and sutureless techniques on postoperative complications after third molar surgery: a systematic review
Falci, S. G. M., Guimarães, MtbÁ, Canarim, N. M., Falci, S. E., Martins, O. B. L., de Souza, G. M., Galvão, E. L.
Clinical oral investigations. 2024;28(1):115
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare, among patients undergoing third molar surgeries, whether the use or omission of sutures improves postoperative clinical parameters. METHOD A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials in humans. The steps of this review were conducted following the PRISMA protocol. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the revised Cochrane tool (RoB 2). The RevMan software was employed for meta-analyses, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. RESULT A total of seven articles were included in the systematic review; however, only one article quantitatively measured bleeding, rendering meta-analysis for this outcome unfeasible. The group of patients in whom sutures were not used presented lower pain and edema on the first day (respectively: MD - 1.08; 95% CI - 1.35 to - 0.81; MD - 1.23; 95% CI - 2.34 to - 0.11) and second day (respectively: MD - 0.50; 95% CI - 0.83 to - 0.17; MD - 10.66; 95% CI - 1.16 to - 0.16) postoperatively, compared to the group where sutures were employed. The group of patients who received sutures exhibited increased trismus on the first day postoperatively (MD 1.04; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.41). CONCLUSION The omission of postoperative sutures in third molar surgeries appears to favor pain and edema outcomes within the first 24 h after the procedure, as well as trismus within the same timeframe. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Despite the suture being the standard conduct in tooth extractions. The omission of sutures in third molar extractions may favor inflammatory outcomes of pain, edema, and trismus in the immediate postoperative period.
-
2.
Comparative Analysis of Hemostatic Efficacy: Local Application of Lancehead Snake Venom Thrombin versus Hemostatic Forceps in Colon Polypectomy
Chen, D., Kou, J., Zhang, J.
Alternative therapies in health and medicine. 2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon polypectomy often involves managing bleeding, and the choice of hemostatic methods is critical for patient outcomes. This study addresses the hemostatic effects of lancehead snake venom thrombin compared to hemostatic forceps in the context of colon polypectomy. OBJECTIVE To compare and assess the effectiveness and safety of local application of lancehead snake venom thrombin and hemostatic forceps in achieving hemostasis during colon polypectomy. DESIGN A randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate and compare the hemostatic outcomes of two different approaches in colon polypectomy. SETTING The study was conducted at the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University Hospital from January 2022 to June 2022. PARTICIPANTS A total of 80 patients with colon polyps who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either the lancehead snake venom thrombin group or the hemostatic forceps group. INTERVENTIONS In the hemostatic forceps group, hemostatic forceps were employed to seal the wound post-polyp resection. In the lancehead snake venom thrombin group, aluminium potassium sulfate gel, in conjunction with locally sprayed lancehead snake venom thrombin, was applied to the wound. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES The study assessed (1) intraoperative immediate bleeding and hemostasis; (2) intraoperative hemostasis time; (3) postoperative delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB); and (4) adverse reactions as primary outcome measures. RESULTS No significant differences were observed in the incidence rate of intraoperative immediate bleeding and the success rate of intraoperative hemostasis between the two groups. The lancehead snake venom thrombin group exhibited a shorter intraoperative hemostasis time and a lower incidence rate of adverse reactions compared to the hemostatic forceps group. No significant difference was found in the incidence rate of postoperative DPPB between the two groups. CONCLUSION Local application of lancehead snake venom thrombin proves to be more effective and safer than hemostatic forceps in promptly managing bleeding during colon polypectomy.
-
3.
Is Using the Harmonic Scalpel Better than Conventional Hemostasis in Neck Dissection? A Meta-Analysis
Hameed, I., Khan, M. O., Samad, S. A., Mahmood, S., Siddiqui, O. M., Hameed, I., Nashit, M., Iqbal, A., Marsia, S., Al Shetawi, A. H.
Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction. 2024;17(1):74-86
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE The clinical decision to pursue harmonic scalpel (HS) method vs conventional hemostasis to treat head and neck cancers has been arguably predicated on the clinical outcomes observed. This study aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of neck dissection between both techniques and perform an updated meta-analysis using the available literature. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through 31st December 2021, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcome metrics included operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes consisted of length of hospital stay, length of drain stay, total drain output, and postoperative complications. A meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Version 5.3 (RevMan) software employing the Random Effects Model. RESULTS We identified 114 articles, out of which 10 randomized control trials (RCTs) analyzing a combined total of 558 patients met the inclusion criteria after title and full-text screening. Meta-analysis shows the group treated with HS had a significantly shorter operative time. [MD = -23.21, 95% CI (-34.30, -12.12) P value <.0001 I(2) = 92%] but an insignificant lesser intraoperative blood loss [MD = -61.53, 95% CI (-88.61, -34.45) P < .00001 I(2) = 79%]. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that that HS use in neck dissection yields a reduced operative time and intra operative blood loss relative to conventional hemostasis. Furthermore, our paper shows no superiority of HS method over conventional hemostasis where length of hospital stays, length of drain stays, and postoperative complications are concerned. Future RCTs with high-level evidence may further elucidate the relative effectiveness of HS method over conventional hemostasis in treating head and neck cancers.
-
4.
Comparison of the effect of open-box versus closed-box prostheses on blood loss following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
Elhalag, R. H., Dean, Y. E., Hamdy, A., Hadhoud, A. M., Chébl, P., Shah, J., Gawad, M., Motawea, K. R.
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012). 2024;86(2):1021-1028
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative blood loss is a common complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The authors aimed to analyze the significance of open versus closed-box prostheses in reducing blood loss after TKA. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Observational studies and clinical trials comparing the effect of open-box versus closed-box prostheses on blood loss following TKA were included. The primary outcome was total blood loss following TKA. Secondary outcomes included average transfused units and total operation time. Continuous data were represented as mean difference (MD) and CI, while dichotomous data were presented as odds ratio (OR) and CI. RevMan software version 5.4 was used to conduct the analysis. RESULTS Four studies with a total number of 687 patients were included. The pooled analysis showed a statistically significant association between closed-box and decreased total blood loss following TKA compared with open-box (MD=173.19, 95% CI=88.77-257.61, P value <0.0001). Similar findings were reported in unilateral TKA (MD=190.63, 95% CI=70.91-310.35, P value=0.002), and bilateral TKA (MD=160.79, 95% CI=61.70-359.86, P value=0.001). There was no significant difference between open and closed-box regarding average transfused units (MD=0.02, 95% CI=-0.07-0.11, P value=0.68), blood transfusion rate (OR=1.38, 95% CI=0.85-2.26, P value=0.20), length of stay (MD=0.06, 95% CI=-0.27 to 0.38, P value=0.74), and total operation time (MD=1.08, 95% CI=-4.62 to 6.79, P value=0.71). CONCLUSION Closed-box reduces the total blood loss following unilateral and bilateral TKA. More studies are warranted to explore the benefits of Closed-box in patients with high bleeding susceptibility.
-
5.
Low versus standard central venous pressure during laparoscopic liver resection: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Stephanos, M., Stewart, C. M. B., Mahmood, A., Brown, C., Hajibandeh, S., Hajibandeh, S., Satyadas, T.
Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. 2024
Abstract
To compare the outcomes of low central venous pressure (CVP) to standard CVP during laparoscopic liver resection. The study design was a systematic review following the PRISMA statement standards. The available literature was searched to identify all studies comparing low CVP with standard CVP in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection. The outcomes included intraoperative blood loss (primary outcome), need for blood transfusion, mean arterial pressure, operative time, Pringle time, and total complications. Random- effects modelling was applied for analyses. Type I and type II errors were assessed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). A total of 8 studies including 682 patients were included (low CVP group, 342; standard CVP group, 340). Low CVP reduced intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic liver resection (mean difference [MD], -193.49 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -339.86 to -47.12; p = 0.01). However, low CVP did not have any effect on blood transfusion requirement (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28-1.03; p = 0.06), mean arterial pressure (MD, -1.55 mm Hg; 95% CI, -3.85-0.75; p = 0.19), Pringle time (MD, -0.99 minutes; 95% CI, -5.82-3.84; p = 0.69), operative time (MD, -16.38 minutes; 95% CI, -36.68-3.39; p = 0.11), or total complications (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.97-3.80; p = 0.06). TSA suggested that the meta-analysis for the primary outcome was not subject to type I or II errors. Low CVP may reduce intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic liver resection (moderate certainty); however, this may not translate into shorter operative time, shorter Pringle time, or less need for blood transfusion. Randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes will provide more robust evidence.
-
6.
Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Stapled Hemorroidopexy Plus Ligation Anopexy With Stapled Hemorroidepexy for Managing Grade III and IV Hemorroidal Disease
Elshazly, W. G., Abo Elros, M. A., Ali, A. S., Radwan, A. M.
Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the benefits of the Stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the short term, management of prolapsing hemorrhoids, the long-term results are still insufficient, regarding recurrent prolapse and patient satisfaction so in our current study we add ligation anopexy to stapled hemorroidopexy. OBJECTIVE Valuation of adding ligation anopexy to stapled hemorroidopexy in improving short and long-term results in the treatment of grade III-IV hemorrhoids. DATA SOURCES Between January 2018 and January 2020 we recruited 124 patients with grade III-IV hemorrhoids, at Alexandria main university hospital. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTIONS One hundred twenty-four patients were blindly randomized into two equal groups, stapled hemorrhoidopexy (group I) and stapled hemorrhoidopexy plus ligation anopexy (group II). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Recurrence of hemorrhoids and patient satisfaction after a follow-up period of at least two years. RESULTS The average operating time was noticeably less in stapled hemorroidopexy group. Meanwhile, postoperative pain, analgesia requirement, hemorrhoids symptoms score, return to work, complications rate, and quality of life 1 month after surgery were similar. Following a mean follow-up of 36 months (interval, 24-47), group I, 10 patients (16%) complained of recurrent external swelling and/or prolapse compared to 3 patients (5%) in group II (p = 0.0368) requiring redo surgery. No redo-surgery was required in group II, furthermore, long-term patient satisfaction was significantly better in group II. LIMITATIONS Longer follow-up needed and single-center experience. CONCLUSIONS Stapled hemorroidopexy compared to stapled hemorroidopexy plus ligation anopexy were similar at short-term results as regard complications rate, hemorrhoids symptoms score, return to work, and quality of life. Long-term results were significantly better as regard recurrence of external swelling and/or prolapse and patient satisfaction after stapled hemorroidopexy plus ligation anopexy. See Video Abstract. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Pan African Clinical Trials Registry identifier PACTR20180100293130.
-
7.
Temporary Portocaval Shunt Provides Superior Intra-operative Hemodynamics and Reduces Blood Loss and Duration of Surgery in Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial
Yl, M. K., Patil, N. S., Mohapatra, N., Sindwani, G., Dhingra, U., Yadav, A., Kale, P., Pamecha, V.
Annals of surgery. 2024
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objectives were to compare intra operative hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, renal function, and duration of surgery with and without TPCS in live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Secondary objectives were post-operative early graft dysfunction (EGD), morbidity, mortality, total ICU and hospital stay. BACKGROUND Blood loss during recipient hepatectomy for liver transplantation (LT) remains a major concern. Routine use of temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) during LT is not yet elucidated. METHODS A single centre, open label, randomized control trial. The sample size was calculated based on intraoperative blood loss. After exclusion, a total of 60 patients, 30 in each arm (TPCS versus no TPCS) were recruited in the trial. RESULTS The baseline recipient and donor characteristics were comparable between the groups. The median intra-operative blood loss (P = 0.004) and blood product transfusions (P<0.05) were significantly less in TPCS group. TPCS group had significantly improved intraoperative hemodynamics in anhepatic phase as compared to no-TPCS group (P<0.0001), requiring significantly less vasopressor support. This led to significantly better renal function as evidenced by higher intraoperative urine output in TPCS group (P=0.002). Because of technical simplicity, TPCS group had significantly fewer IVC injuries (3.3 vs. 26.7%, P=0.026) and substantially shorter hepatectomy time and total duration of surgery (529.4 ± 35.54 vs. 606.83 ± 48.13 mins, P<0.0001). ). Time taken for normalisation of lactate in the immediate post-operative period was significantly shorter in TPCS group (median, 6 h vs. 13 h; P=0.04). Although post-operative endotoxemia, major morbidity, 90day mortality, total ICU and hospital stay were comparable between both the groups, tolerance to enteral feed was earlier in the TPCS group. CONCLUSION In LDLT, TPCS is a simple and effective technique that provides superior intraoperative hemodynamics and reduces blood loss and duration of surgery.
-
8.
Twenty-years of Embolization for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Meta-analysis of Rebleeding and Ischemia Rates
Yu, Q., Funaki, B., Ahmed, O.
The British journal of radiology. 2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transarterial embolization (TAE) for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) can be technically challenging due to the compromise between achieving hemostasis and causing tissue ischemia. The goal of the present study is to determine its technical success, rebleeding, and post-embolization ischemia rates through meta-analysis of published literature in the last twenty-years. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried. Technical success, rebleeding, and ischemia rates were extracted. Baseline characteristics such as author, publication year, region, study design, embolization material, percentage of superselective embolization were retrieved. Subgroup analysis was performed based on publication time and embolization agent. RESULTS A total of 66 studies including 2121 patients who underwent embolization for acute LGIB were included. Endoscopic management was attempted in 34.5%. The pooled overall technical success, rebleeding, post-embolization ischemia rates were 97.0%, 20.7%, and 7.5%, respectively. Studies published after 2010 showed higher technical success rates (97.8% vs 95.2%), lower rebleeding rates (18.6% vs 23.4%), and lower ischemia rates (7.3% vs 9.7%). Compared to microcoils, NBCA was associated with a lower rebleeding rate (9.3% vs 20.8%) at the expense of a higher post-embolization ischemia rate (9.7% vs 4.0%). Coagulopathy (p = 0.034), inotropic use (p = 0.040), and malignancy (p = 0.002) were predictors of post-embolization rebleeding; hemorrhagic shock (p < 0.001), inotropic use (p = 0.026), malignancy (p < 0.001), coagulopathy (p = 0.002), blood transfusion (p < 0.001), and enteritis (p = 0.023) were predictors of mortality. Empiric embolization achieved a similarly durable hemostasis rate to targeted embolization (23.6% vs 21.1%) but a higher risk of post-embolization ischemia (14.3% vs 4.7%). CONCLUSION For LGIB, TAE has a favorable technical success rate and low risk of post-embolization ischemia. Its safety and efficacy profile has increased over the last decade. Compared to microcoils, NBCA seemed to offer a more durable hemostasis rate at the expense of higher ischemia risk. Due to the heterogeneity of currently available evidence, future prospective and comparative studies are warranted.
-
9.
Endoscopic Surgery Versus Stereotactic Aspiration in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Yang, L., Yang, M., He, M., Zhou, X., Zhou, Z.
World neurosurgery. 2024
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To comprehensively compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic surgery (ES) and stereotactic aspiration (SA) in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). METHODS We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to July 31, 2023. Studies comparing ES and SA for sICH treatment were also included. Outcome measures included primary outcomes (mortality and good functional outcome (GFO)) and secondary outcomes (evacuation rate, residual hematoma, perihematomal edema (PHE), operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay duration, intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration, hospital cost, complications, and reoperation). Subgroup analyses assessed the influence of age, hematoma volume, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and time to surgery on the outcomes. RESULTS Nine studies (one randomized controlled trial and eight observational studies) with 2105 patients (705 and 1400 in the ES and SA groups, respectively) were included in this meta-analysis. The final analysis indicated that compared with SA, ES was associated with enhanced GFO and a higher evacuation rate 1 d post-surgery along with reduced mortality and residual hematoma. Conversely, ES did not confer benefits in terms of perihematomal edema, operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, or hospital stay duration compared with SA. Subgroup analysis highlighted the significant influences of age and hematoma volume on mortality, whereas hematoma volume and GCS score affected GFO. CONCLUSIONS ES is a safe and effective approach for sICH treatment, leading to improved patient prognosis and quality of life compared to SA.
-
10.
A systematic review of tourniquet use in paediatric orthopaedic surgery: can we extrapolate from adult guidelines?
Pintar, V., Brookes, C., Trompeter, A., Bridgens, A., Hing, C., Gelfer, Y.
EFORT open reviews. 2024;9(1):80-91
Abstract
PURPOSE Tourniquets are commonly used intraoperatively in orthopaedic surgery to control bleeding and improve visibility in the surgical field. Recent evidence has thrown into question the routine use of tourniquets in the adult population resulting in a British Orthopaedic Association standard for intraoperative use. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the practice, benefits, and risks of the intraoperative use of tourniquets for trauma and elective orthopaedic surgery in the paediatric population. METHODS A prospectively registered systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42022359048). A search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and a Grey literature search was performed from their earliest record to 23 March 2023. Studies reporting tourniquet data in paediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery were included. Data extracted included demographics, involved limb, trauma versus elective use, tourniquet use as primary or secondary measure, and tourniquet parameters and complications. RESULTS Thirty-nine studies were included. Tourniquet practices and information reporting varied considerably. Tourniquets were used uneventfully in the majority of patients with no specific benefits reported. Several physiological and biochemical changes as well as complications including nerve injury, compartment syndrome, skin burns, thrombosis, post-operative limb swelling, and pain were reported. CONCLUSIONS Tourniquets are routinely used in both trauma and elective paediatric orthopaedic surgery with no high-quality research affirming benefits. Severe complications associated with their use are rare but do occur. High-quality studies addressing their benefits, the exact indication in children, and the safest way to use them in this population are necessary.