-
1.
Routine Versus On-Demand Blood Sampling in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review
Hjortsø CJS, Møller MH, Perner A, Brøchner AC
Critical care medicine. 2023
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to provide an overview of the current evidence on routine versus on-demand blood sampling in critical care. We assessed the reported proportion of patients exposed to daily routine blood sampling, the tests performed, characteristics associated with more frequent blood sampling, and the reported benefits and harms of routine blood sampling compared with on-demand sampling. DATA SOURCES We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, the Excerpta Medica Database, and the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online for studies assessing routine versus on-demand blood testing in critically ill patients from inception to September 2022. STUDY SELECTION Abstracts and full texts were assessed independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. STUDY EXTRACTION Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers using predefined extraction forms. DATA SYNTHESIS Of 12,212 records screened, 298 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. We included 70 studies; 50 nonrandomized interventional studies and 20 observational studies. Exposure to routine blood testing was 52-100% (very low certainty of evidence). Blood testing seemed to occur more frequently in medical intensive care settings with a median of 18 blood tests per patient day (interquartile range, 10-33) (very low certainty of evidence). Mixed biochemistry seemed to be the most frequently performed blood tests across all settings (five tests per patient day; interquartile range, 2-10) (very low certainty of evidence). Reductions in routine blood testing seemed to be associated with reduced transfusion rates and costs without apparent adverse patient outcomes (low certainty of evidence). CONCLUSIONS In this systematic review, routine blood testing in critically ill patients was common and varied considerably. A reduction in routine blood testing appeared to be associated with reduced transfusion rates and costs without adverse effects, but the evidence was very uncertain.
PICO Summary
Population
Critically ill patients (70 studies).
Intervention
Routine blood sampling.
Comparison
On-demand blood sampling.
Outcome
Exposure to routine blood testing was 52-100% (very low certainty of evidence). Blood testing seemed to occur more frequently in medical intensive care settings with a median of 18 blood tests per patient day (interquartile range, 10-33), (very low certainty of evidence). Mixed biochemistry seemed to be the most frequently performed blood tests across all settings (five tests per patient day; interquartile range, 2-10), (very low certainty of evidence). Reductions in routine blood testing seemed to be associated with reduced transfusion rates and costs without apparent adverse patient outcomes (low certainty of evidence).
-
2.
What blood conservation practices are effective at reducing blood sampling volumes and other clinical sequelae in intensive care? A systematic review
Keogh S, Mathew S, Ullman AJ, Rickard CM, Coyer F
Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses. 2023
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to critically appraise and synthesise evidence for blood conservation strategies in intensive care. Blood sampling is a critical aspect of intensive care to guide clinical decision-making. Repeated blood sampling can result in blood waste and contamination, leading to iatrogenic anaemia and systemic infection. REVIEW METHOD USED Cochrane systematic review methods were used including meta-analysis, and independent reviewers. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted in Medline, CINAHL, PUBMED and EMBASE databases. The search was limited to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs, published in English between 2000 and 2021. REVIEW METHODS Paired authors independently assessed database search results and identified eligible studies. Trials comparing any blood conservation practice or product in intensive care were included. Primary outcomes were blood sample volumes and haemoglobin change. Secondary outcomes included proportion of patients receiving transfusions and infection outcomes. Quality appraisal employed the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis using random effects approach and narrative synthesis summarised findings. RESULTS Eight studies (n = 1027 patients), all RCTs were eligible. Six studies included adults, one studied paediatrics and one studied preterm infants. Seven studies evaluated a closed loop blood sampling system, and one studied a conservative phlebotomy protocol. Studies were of low to moderate quality. Meta-analysis was not possible for interventions targeting blood sample volumes or haemoglobin. Decreased blood sample volumes reported in four studies were attributable to a closed loop system or conservative phlebotomy. No study reported a significant change in haemoglobin. Meta-analysis demonstrated that use of a closed system (compared to open system) reduced the proportion of patients receiving transfusion [Risk Ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92; 287 patients] and reduced intraluminal fluid colonisation [RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.58; 500 patients]. CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence demonstrates closed loop blood sampling systems reduced transfusion use and fluid colonisation. Simultaneous effectiveness-implementation evaluation of these systems and blood conservation strategies is urgently required. PROSPERO PROTOCOL REGISTRATION REFERENCE CRD42019137227.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients (adults, neonates and paediatrics) admitted to an intensive care unit (8 randomised controlled trials, n= 1,027).
Intervention
Different blood sampling strategies and systems, including the standard open arterial blood sampling system.
Comparison
Various comparators, including the closed-loop arterial blood sampling system, and adding small-volume tubes to the closed-loop system.
Outcome
Seven studies evaluated a closed loop blood sampling system, and one studied a conservative phlebotomy protocol. Studies were of low to moderate quality. Meta-analysis was not possible for interventions targeting blood sample volumes or haemoglobin. Decreased blood sample volumes reported in four studies were attributable to a closed loop system or conservative phlebotomy. No study reported a significant change in haemoglobin. Meta-analysis demonstrated that use of a closed system (compared to open system) reduced the proportion of patients receiving transfusion (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92; 287 patients) and reduced intraluminal fluid colonisation (RR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.58; 500 patients).
-
3.
Volume replacement in the resuscitation of trauma patients with acute hemorrhage: an umbrella review
Gianola, S., Castellini, G., Biffi, A., Porcu, G., Napoletano, A., Coclite, D., D'Angelo, D., Di Nitto, M., Fauci, A. J., Punzo, O., et al
International journal of emergency medicine. 2023;16(1):87
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of intravenous fluid therapy in patients with major trauma in prehospital settings is still controversial. We conducted an umbrella review to evaluate which is the best volume expansion in the resuscitation of a hemorrhagic shock to support the development of major trauma guideline recommendations. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL up to September 2022 for systematic reviews (SRs) investigating the use of volume expansion fluid on mortality and/or survival. Quality assessment was performed using AMSTAR 2 and the Certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS We included 14 SRs investigating the effects on mortality with the comparisons: use of crystalloids, blood components, and whole blood. Most SRs were judged as critically low with slight overlapping of primary studies and high consistency of results. For crystalloids, inconsistent evidence of effectiveness in 28- to 30-day survival (primary endpoint) was found for the hypertonic saline/dextran group compared with isotonic fluid solutions with moderate certainty of evidence. Pre-hospital blood component infusion seems to reduce mortality, however, as the certainty of evidence ranges from very low to moderate, we are unable to provide evidence to support or reject its use. The blood component ratio was in favor of higher ratios among all comparisons considered with moderate to very low certainty of evidence. Results about the effects of whole blood are very uncertain due to limited and heterogeneous interventions in studies included in SRs. CONCLUSION Hypertonic crystalloid use did not result in superior 28- to 30-day survival. Increasing evidence supports the scientific rationale for early use of high-ratio blood components, but their use requires careful consideration. Preliminary evidence is very uncertain about the effects of whole blood and further high-quality studies are required.
PICO Summary
Population
Trauma patients with haemorrhagic shock (14 systematic reviews).
Intervention
Crystalloids, packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, liquid plasma, lyophilized plasma, low titre 0-negative whole blood.
Comparison
A comparison or combination of the above (including different ratios).
Outcome
For crystalloids, inconsistent evidence of effectiveness in 28- to 30-day survival (primary endpoint) was found for the hypertonic saline/dextran group compared with isotonic fluid solutions with moderate certainty of evidence. Pre-hospital blood component infusion seems to reduce mortality, however, as the certainty of evidence ranges from very low to moderate, the authors are unable to provide evidence to support or reject its use. The blood component ratio was in favour of higher ratios among all comparisons considered with moderate to very low certainty of evidence. Results about the effects of whole blood are very uncertain due to limited and heterogeneous interventions in studies included in systematic reviews.
-
4.
Tranexamic Acid for Traumatic Injury in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Bias-Adjusted Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Fouche, P. F., Stein, C., Nichols, M., Meadley, B., Bendall, J. C., Smith, K., Anderson, D., Doi, S. A.
Annals of emergency medicine. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Traumatic injury causes a significant number of deaths due to bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, can reduce bleeding in traumatic injuries and potentially enhance outcomes. Previous reviews suggested potential TXA benefits but did not consider the latest trials. METHODS A systematic review and bias-adjusted meta-analysis were performed to assess TXA's effectiveness in emergency traumatic injury settings by pooling estimates from randomized controlled trials. Researchers searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials comparing TXA's effects to a placebo in emergency trauma cases. The primary endpoint was 1-month mortality. The methodological quality of the trials underwent assessment using the MASTER scale, and the meta-analysis applied the quality-effects method to adjust for methodological quality. RESULTS Seven randomized controlled trials met the set criteria. This meta-analysis indicated an 11% decrease in the death risk at 1 month after TXA use (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 0.95) with a number needed to treat of 61 to avoid 1 additional death. The meta-analysis also revealed reduced 24-hour mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.88) for TXA. No compelling evidence of increased vascular occlusive events emerged (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.27). Subgroup analyses highlighted TXA's effectiveness in general trauma versus traumatic brain injury and survival advantages when administered out-of-hospital versus inhospital. CONCLUSIONS This synthesis demonstrates that TXA use for trauma in emergencies leads to a reduction in 1-month mortality, with no significant evidence of problematic vascular occlusive events. Administering TXA in the out-of-hospital setting is associated with reduced mortality compared to inhospital administration, and less mortality with TXA in systemic trauma is noted compared with traumatic brain injury specifically.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with traumatic injuries in emergency settings (7 randomised controlled trials).
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (TXA).
Comparison
Placebo.
Outcome
The primary endpoint was 1-month mortality. The meta-analysis indicated an 11% decrease in the death risk at 1 month after TXA use (odds ratio [OR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.84, 0.95]) with a number needed to treat of 61 to avoid 1 additional death. The meta-analysis also revealed reduced 24-hour mortality (OR 0.76; 95% CI [0.65, 0.88]) for TXA. No compelling evidence of increased vascular occlusive events emerged (OR 0.96; 95% CI [0.73, 1.27]). Subgroup analyses highlighted TXA's effectiveness in general trauma versus traumatic brain injury and survival advantages when administered out-of-hospital versus in-hospital.
-
5.
Factors that influence the administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) to trauma patients in prehospital settings: a systematic review
Nicholson, H., Scotney, N., Briscoe, S., Kirby, K., Bedson, A., Goodwin, L., Robinson, M., Taylor, H., Thompson Coon, J., Voss, S., et al
BMJ open. 2023;13(5):e073075
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the UK there are around 5400 deaths annually from injury. Tranexamic acid (TXA) prevents bleeding and has been shown to reduce trauma mortality. However, only 5% of UK major trauma patients who are at risk of haemorrhage receive prehospital TXA. This review aims to examine the evidence regarding factors influencing the prehospital administration of TXA to trauma patients. DESIGN Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, Embase and MEDLINE were searched from January 2010 to 2020; searches were updated in June 2022. CLINICALTRIALS gov and OpenGrey were also searched and forward and backwards citation chasing performed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA All primary research reporting factors influencing TXA administration to trauma patients in the prehospital setting was included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers performed the selection process, quality assessment and data extraction. Data were tabulated, grouped by setting and influencing factor and synthesised narratively. RESULTS Twenty papers (278 249 participants in total) were included in the final synthesis; 13 papers from civilian and 7 from military settings. Thirteen studies were rated as 'moderate' using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. Several common factors were identified: knowledge and skills; consequences and social influences; injury type (severity, injury site and mechanism); protocols; resources; priorities; patient age; patient sex. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights an absence of high-quality research. Preliminary evidence suggests a host of system and individual-level factors that may be important in determining whether TXA is administered to trauma patients in the prehospital setting. FUNDING AND REGISTRATION This review was supported by Research Capability Funding from the South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust and the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020162943.
PICO Summary
Population
Any trauma patients in prehospital settings (20 studies, n= 278,249).
Intervention
Exposure: Factors influencing the decision to administer tranexamic acid (TXA).
Comparison
Outcome
This systematic review included 13 studies from civilian settings and 7 studies from military settings. This review highlighted a lack of high-quality research addressing the factors that influence prehospital TXA administration, particularly in children or patients with isolated head injuries. Common factors identified suggested a host of system and individual-level factors including: knowledge and skills, consequences and social influences, injury type (including severity, injury site and mechanism of injury), protocols, resources, priorities, patient age, and patient sex.
-
6.
The Impact of Time to Hemostatic Intervention and Delayed Care for Patients with Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review
Lamb T, Tran A, Lampron J, Shorr R, Taljaard M, Vaillancourt C
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2023
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uncontrolled bleeding is a common cause of preventable mortality in trauma. While intuitive that delays to hemostasis may lead to worse outcomes, the impacts of these delays remain incompletely explored. This systematic review aimed to characterize the extant definitions of delayed hemostatic intervention and to quantify the impacts of delays on clinical outcomes. METHODS We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception to August 2022. Studies defining "delayed intervention" and those comparing times to intervention among adults presenting to hospital with blunt or penetrating injuries who required major hemostatic intervention were eligible. The co-primary outcomes were mortality and the definition of delay to hemostasis employed. Secondary outcomes included units of packed red blood cells received, length of stay in hospital, and length of stay in intensive care. RESULTS We identified 2,050 studies, with 24 studies including 10,168 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were retrospective observational cohort studies and most were at high risk of bias. A variety of injury patterns and hemostatic interventions were considered, with 69.6% of studies reporting a statistically significant impact of increased time to intervention on mortality. Definitions of delayed intervention ranged from ten minutes to four hours. Conflicting data were reported for impact of time on receipt of blood products, while one study found a significant impact on intensive care length of stay. No studies assessed length of stay in hospital. CONCLUSIONS The extant literature is heterogeneous with respect to injuries included, methods of hemostasis employed, and durations of delay examined. While the majority of the included studies demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between time to intervention and mortality, an evidence-informed definition of delayed intervention for bleeding trauma patients at large has not been solidified. Additional, standardized research is needed to establish targets which could reduce morbidity and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Systematic Review.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with traumatic haemorrhage (24 studies, n= 10,168).
Intervention
Systematic review to characterize the extant definitions of delayed haemostatic intervention and to quantify the impacts of delays on clinical outcomes.
Comparison
Outcome
The majority of studies were retrospective observational cohort studies and most were at high risk of bias. A variety of injury patterns and haemostatic interventions were considered, with 69.6% of studies reporting a statistically significant impact of increased time to intervention on mortality. Definitions of delayed intervention ranged from ten minutes to four hours. Conflicting data were reported for impact of time on receipt of blood products, while one study found a significant impact on intensive care length of stay. No studies assessed length of stay in hospital.
-
7.
Effect of Early Erythropoietin on Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Stratified Meta-Analysis
Fischer, H. S., Reibel, N. J., Bührer, C., Dame, C.
Neonatology. 2023;:1-11
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) lost its role in minimizing red blood cell transfusion in very preterm infants after it had been associated with severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Previous systematic reviews did not stratify ROP by gestation and birth weight (BW). OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early prophylactic rhEPO on ROP in a stratified meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS The databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched in January 2022 and complemented by citation searching. RCTs comparing early rhEPO treatment with no treatment or placebo were selected if they were published in a peer-reviewed journal and reported ROP outcomes. Previously unpublished data were requested from the study authors to allow stratified analyses by gestational age (GA) and BW. Data were extracted and analyzed using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Pre-specified outcomes were "ROP stage ≥3" (primary outcome) and "any ROP." RESULTS Fourteen RCTs, comprising 2,040 infants of <29 weeks of GA, were included for meta-analysis. Data syntheses showed no effects of rhEPO on ROP stage ≥3 or on any ROP, neither in infants of <29 weeks GA, nor in infants of <1,000 g BW, nor in any GA strata. The risk ratio (95% confidence interval) for ROP stage ≥3 in infants of <29 weeks of GA was 1.13 (0.84, 1.53), p = 0.41 (quality of evidence: moderate). CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis detected no effects of early rhEPO on ROP in any comparison, but most stratified analyses were limited by low statistical power.
PICO Summary
Population
Infants of <29 weeks of gestational age (GA), (14 randomised controlled trials, n= 2,040).
Intervention
Early recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO).
Comparison
No treatment or placebo.
Outcome
Data syntheses showed no effects of rhEPO on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) stage ≥3 or on any ROP, neither in infants of <29 weeks GA, nor in infants of <1,000 g birth weight, nor in any GA strata. The risk ratio for ROP stage ≥3 in infants of <29 weeks of GA was 1.13; 95% confidence interval [0.84, 1.53], (quality of evidence: moderate).
-
8.
Outcomes of Transfusion With Whole Blood, Component Therapy, or Both in Adult Civilian Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ngatuvai M, Zagales I, Sauder M, Andrade R, Santos RG, Bilski T, Kornblith L, Elkbuli A
The Journal of surgical research. 2023;287:193-201
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare outcomes, including transfusion volume, complications, intensive care unit length of stay, and mortality for adult civilian trauma patients transfused with whole blood (WB), components (COMP), or both (WB + COMP). METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using studies that evaluated outcomes of transfusion of WB, COMP, or WB + COMP for adult civilian trauma patients. A search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane from database inception to March 3, 2022 was conducted. The search resulted in 18,400 initial articles with 16 studies remaining after the removal of duplicates and screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS This study identified an increased risk of 24-h mortality with COMP versus WB + COMP (relative risk: 1.40 [1.10, 1.78]) and increased transfusion volumes of red blood cells with COMP versus WB at 6 and 24 h, respectively (-2.26 [-3.82, -0.70]; -1.94 [-3.22, -0.65] units). There were no differences in the calculated rates of infections or intensive care unit length of stay between WB and COMP, respectively (relative risks: 1.35 [0.53, 3.46]; -0.91 [-2.64, 0.83]). CONCLUSIONS Transfusion with WB + COMP is associated with lower 24-h mortality versus COMP and transfusion with WB is associated with a lower volume of red blood cells transfused at both 6 and 24 h. Based on these findings, greater utilization of whole blood in civilian adult trauma resuscitation may lead to improved mortality and reduced transfusion requirements.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult civilian trauma patients (16 studies).
Intervention
Whole blood (WB).
Comparison
Component therapy (COMP); whole blood and component therapy (WB + COMP).
Outcome
This systematic review and meta-analysis identified an increased risk of 24h mortality with COMP versus WB + COMP (relative risk: 1.40 [1.10, 1.78]) and increased transfusion volumes of red blood cells with COMP versus WB at 6 and 24h, respectively (-2.26 [-3.82, -0.70]; -1.94 [-3.22, -0.65] units). There were no differences in the calculated rates of infections or intensive care unit length of stay between WB and COMP, respectively (relative risks: 1.35 [0.53, 3.46]; -0.91 [-2.64, 0.83]).
-
9.
Impact of time and distance on outcomes following tourniquet use in civilian and military settings: A scoping review
Joarder M, Noureddine El Moussaoui H, Das A, Williamson F, Wullschleger M
Injury. 2023
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND The last two decades have seen the reintroduction of tourniquets into guidelines for the management of acute limb trauma requiring hemorrhage control. Evidence supporting tourniquet application has demonstrated low complication rates in modern military settings involving rapid evacuation timeframes. It is unclear how these findings translate to patients who have prolonged transport times from injury in rural settings. This scoping review investigates the relationship between time and distance on metabolic complications, limb salvage and mortality following tourniquet use in civilian and military settings. METHODS A systematic search strategy was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and SafetyLit databases. Study characteristics, setting, mechanism of injury, prehospital time, tourniquet time, distance, limb salvage, metabolic response, mortality, and tourniquet removal details were extracted from eligible studies. Descriptive statistics were recorded, and studies were grouped by ischemia time (< 2 h, 2-4 h, or > 4 h). RESULTS The search identified 3103 studies, from which 86 studies were included in this scoping review. Of the 86 studies, 55 studies were primarily in civilian environments and 32 were based in military settings. One study included both settings. Blast injury was the most common mechanism of injury sustained by patients in military settings (72.8% [5968/8200]) followed by penetrating injury (23.5% [1926/8200]). In contrast, in civilian settings penetrating injury was the most common mechanism (47.7% [1633/3426]) followed by blunt injury (36.4% [1246/3426]). Tourniquet time was reported in 66/86 studies. Tourniquet time over four hours was associated with reduced limb salvage rates (57.1%) and higher mortality rates (7.1%) compared with a tourniquet time of less than two hours. The overall limb salvage and mortality rates were 69.6% and 6.7% respectively. Metabolic outcomes were reported in 28/86 studies with smaller sample sizes and inconsistencies in which parameters were reported. CONCLUSION This scoping review presents literature describing comparatively safe tourniquet application when used for less than two hours duration. However, there is limited research describing prolonged tourniquet application or when used for protracted distances, such that the impact of tourniquet release time on metabolic outcomes and complications remains unclear. Prospective studies utilizing the development of an international database to provide this dataset is required.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients in civilian and military settings who had a tourniquet applied for the management of acute limb trauma (86 studies).
Intervention
Scoping review investigating the relationship between time and distance on metabolic complications, limb salvage and mortality following tourniquet use.
Comparison
Outcome
Most included studies (55) were based in civilian environments, 32 were based in military settings, and 1 included both settings. Blast injury was the most common mechanism of injury sustained by patients in military settings (72.8% [5968/8200]) followed by penetrating injury (23.5% [1926/8200]). In civilian settings, penetrating injury was the most common mechanism (47.7% [1633/3426]) followed by blunt injury (36.4% [1246/3426]). Tourniquet time was reported in 66/86 studies. Tourniquet time over four hours was associated with reduced limb salvage rates (57.1%) and higher mortality rates (7.1%) compared with a tourniquet time of less than two hours. The overall limb salvage and mortality rates were 69.6% and 6.7% respectively. Metabolic outcomes were reported in 28/86 studies with smaller sample sizes and inconsistencies in which parameters were reported.
-
10.
Predictors of transfusion in trauma and their utility in the prehospital environment: a scoping review
Yin G, Radulovic N, O'Neill M, Lightfoot D, Nolan B
Prehospital emergency care. 2022;:1-25
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Background: Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable mortality from trauma, necessitating resuscitation through blood product transfusions. Early and accurate identification of patients requiring transfusions in the prehospital setting may reduce delays in time to transfusion upon arrival to hospital, reducing mortality. The purpose of this study is to characterize existing literature on predictors of transfusion and analyze their utility in the prehospital context.Objectives: The objectives of this study are to characterize the existing quantity and quality of literature regarding predictor scores for transfusion in injured patients, and to analyse the utility of predictor scores for massive transfusions in the prehospital setting and identify prehospital predictor scores for future research.Methods: A search strategy was developed in consultation with information specialists. A literature search of OVID MEDLINE from 1946 to present was conducted for primary studies evaluating the predictive ability of scoring systems or single variables in predicting transfusion in all trauma settings.Results: Of the 5824 studies were identified, 5784 studies underwent title and abstract screening, 94 studies underwent full text review, and 72 studies were included in the final review. We identified 16 single variables and 52 scoring systems for predicting transfusion. Amongst single predictor variables, fluids administered and systolic blood pressure had the highest reported sensitivity (100%) and specificity (89%) for massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation respectively. Amongst scoring systems for transfusion, the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index had the highest reported sensitivity (96%), while the Pre-arrival Model had the highest reported specificity (95%) for MTP activation. Overall, 20 scores were identified as being applicable to the prehospital setting, 25 scores were identified as being potentially applicable, and seven scores were identified as being not applicable.Conclusions: We identified an extensive list of predictive single variables, validated scoring systems, and derived models for massive transfusion, presented their properties, and identified those with potential utility in the prehospital setting. By further validating applicable scoring tools in the prehospital setting, we may begin to administer more timely transfusions in the trauma population.
PICO Summary
Population
Trauma patients (72 studies).
Intervention
Scoping review to characterize the existing literature regarding predictor scores for transfusion in injured patients, to analyse the utility of predictor scores for massive transfusions in the prehospital setting, and to identify pre-hospital predictor scores for future research.
Comparison
Outcome
Sixteen single variables and fifty-two scoring systems were identified for predicting transfusion. Amongst single predictor variables, fluids administered and systolic blood pressure had the highest reported sensitivity (100%) and specificity (89%) for massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation respectively. Amongst scoring systems for transfusion, the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index had the highest reported sensitivity (96%), while the Pre-arrival Model had the highest reported specificity (95%) for MTP activation. Overall, 20 scores were identified as being applicable to the pre-hospital setting, 25 scores were identified as being potentially applicable, and seven scores were identified as being not applicable.