-
1.
Routine Versus On-Demand Blood Sampling in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review
Hjortsø CJS, Møller MH, Perner A, Brøchner AC
Critical care medicine. 2023
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to provide an overview of the current evidence on routine versus on-demand blood sampling in critical care. We assessed the reported proportion of patients exposed to daily routine blood sampling, the tests performed, characteristics associated with more frequent blood sampling, and the reported benefits and harms of routine blood sampling compared with on-demand sampling. DATA SOURCES We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, the Excerpta Medica Database, and the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online for studies assessing routine versus on-demand blood testing in critically ill patients from inception to September 2022. STUDY SELECTION Abstracts and full texts were assessed independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. STUDY EXTRACTION Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers using predefined extraction forms. DATA SYNTHESIS Of 12,212 records screened, 298 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. We included 70 studies; 50 nonrandomized interventional studies and 20 observational studies. Exposure to routine blood testing was 52-100% (very low certainty of evidence). Blood testing seemed to occur more frequently in medical intensive care settings with a median of 18 blood tests per patient day (interquartile range, 10-33) (very low certainty of evidence). Mixed biochemistry seemed to be the most frequently performed blood tests across all settings (five tests per patient day; interquartile range, 2-10) (very low certainty of evidence). Reductions in routine blood testing seemed to be associated with reduced transfusion rates and costs without apparent adverse patient outcomes (low certainty of evidence). CONCLUSIONS In this systematic review, routine blood testing in critically ill patients was common and varied considerably. A reduction in routine blood testing appeared to be associated with reduced transfusion rates and costs without adverse effects, but the evidence was very uncertain.
PICO Summary
Population
Critically ill patients (70 studies).
Intervention
Routine blood sampling.
Comparison
On-demand blood sampling.
Outcome
Exposure to routine blood testing was 52-100% (very low certainty of evidence). Blood testing seemed to occur more frequently in medical intensive care settings with a median of 18 blood tests per patient day (interquartile range, 10-33), (very low certainty of evidence). Mixed biochemistry seemed to be the most frequently performed blood tests across all settings (five tests per patient day; interquartile range, 2-10), (very low certainty of evidence). Reductions in routine blood testing seemed to be associated with reduced transfusion rates and costs without apparent adverse patient outcomes (low certainty of evidence).
-
2.
Tranexamic Acid for Traumatic Injury in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Bias-Adjusted Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Fouche, P. F., Stein, C., Nichols, M., Meadley, B., Bendall, J. C., Smith, K., Anderson, D., Doi, S. A.
Annals of emergency medicine. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Traumatic injury causes a significant number of deaths due to bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, can reduce bleeding in traumatic injuries and potentially enhance outcomes. Previous reviews suggested potential TXA benefits but did not consider the latest trials. METHODS A systematic review and bias-adjusted meta-analysis were performed to assess TXA's effectiveness in emergency traumatic injury settings by pooling estimates from randomized controlled trials. Researchers searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials comparing TXA's effects to a placebo in emergency trauma cases. The primary endpoint was 1-month mortality. The methodological quality of the trials underwent assessment using the MASTER scale, and the meta-analysis applied the quality-effects method to adjust for methodological quality. RESULTS Seven randomized controlled trials met the set criteria. This meta-analysis indicated an 11% decrease in the death risk at 1 month after TXA use (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 0.95) with a number needed to treat of 61 to avoid 1 additional death. The meta-analysis also revealed reduced 24-hour mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.88) for TXA. No compelling evidence of increased vascular occlusive events emerged (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.27). Subgroup analyses highlighted TXA's effectiveness in general trauma versus traumatic brain injury and survival advantages when administered out-of-hospital versus inhospital. CONCLUSIONS This synthesis demonstrates that TXA use for trauma in emergencies leads to a reduction in 1-month mortality, with no significant evidence of problematic vascular occlusive events. Administering TXA in the out-of-hospital setting is associated with reduced mortality compared to inhospital administration, and less mortality with TXA in systemic trauma is noted compared with traumatic brain injury specifically.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with traumatic injuries in emergency settings (7 randomised controlled trials).
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (TXA).
Comparison
Placebo.
Outcome
The primary endpoint was 1-month mortality. The meta-analysis indicated an 11% decrease in the death risk at 1 month after TXA use (odds ratio [OR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.84, 0.95]) with a number needed to treat of 61 to avoid 1 additional death. The meta-analysis also revealed reduced 24-hour mortality (OR 0.76; 95% CI [0.65, 0.88]) for TXA. No compelling evidence of increased vascular occlusive events emerged (OR 0.96; 95% CI [0.73, 1.27]). Subgroup analyses highlighted TXA's effectiveness in general trauma versus traumatic brain injury and survival advantages when administered out-of-hospital versus in-hospital.
-
3.
Factors that influence the administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) to trauma patients in prehospital settings: a systematic review
Nicholson, H., Scotney, N., Briscoe, S., Kirby, K., Bedson, A., Goodwin, L., Robinson, M., Taylor, H., Thompson Coon, J., Voss, S., et al
BMJ open. 2023;13(5):e073075
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the UK there are around 5400 deaths annually from injury. Tranexamic acid (TXA) prevents bleeding and has been shown to reduce trauma mortality. However, only 5% of UK major trauma patients who are at risk of haemorrhage receive prehospital TXA. This review aims to examine the evidence regarding factors influencing the prehospital administration of TXA to trauma patients. DESIGN Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, Embase and MEDLINE were searched from January 2010 to 2020; searches were updated in June 2022. CLINICALTRIALS gov and OpenGrey were also searched and forward and backwards citation chasing performed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA All primary research reporting factors influencing TXA administration to trauma patients in the prehospital setting was included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers performed the selection process, quality assessment and data extraction. Data were tabulated, grouped by setting and influencing factor and synthesised narratively. RESULTS Twenty papers (278 249 participants in total) were included in the final synthesis; 13 papers from civilian and 7 from military settings. Thirteen studies were rated as 'moderate' using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. Several common factors were identified: knowledge and skills; consequences and social influences; injury type (severity, injury site and mechanism); protocols; resources; priorities; patient age; patient sex. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights an absence of high-quality research. Preliminary evidence suggests a host of system and individual-level factors that may be important in determining whether TXA is administered to trauma patients in the prehospital setting. FUNDING AND REGISTRATION This review was supported by Research Capability Funding from the South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust and the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020162943.
PICO Summary
Population
Any trauma patients in prehospital settings (20 studies, n= 278,249).
Intervention
Exposure: Factors influencing the decision to administer tranexamic acid (TXA).
Comparison
Outcome
This systematic review included 13 studies from civilian settings and 7 studies from military settings. This review highlighted a lack of high-quality research addressing the factors that influence prehospital TXA administration, particularly in children or patients with isolated head injuries. Common factors identified suggested a host of system and individual-level factors including: knowledge and skills, consequences and social influences, injury type (including severity, injury site and mechanism of injury), protocols, resources, priorities, patient age, and patient sex.
-
4.
Effect of Early Erythropoietin on Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Stratified Meta-Analysis
Fischer, H. S., Reibel, N. J., Bührer, C., Dame, C.
Neonatology. 2023;:1-11
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) lost its role in minimizing red blood cell transfusion in very preterm infants after it had been associated with severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Previous systematic reviews did not stratify ROP by gestation and birth weight (BW). OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early prophylactic rhEPO on ROP in a stratified meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS The databases EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched in January 2022 and complemented by citation searching. RCTs comparing early rhEPO treatment with no treatment or placebo were selected if they were published in a peer-reviewed journal and reported ROP outcomes. Previously unpublished data were requested from the study authors to allow stratified analyses by gestational age (GA) and BW. Data were extracted and analyzed using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Pre-specified outcomes were "ROP stage ≥3" (primary outcome) and "any ROP." RESULTS Fourteen RCTs, comprising 2,040 infants of <29 weeks of GA, were included for meta-analysis. Data syntheses showed no effects of rhEPO on ROP stage ≥3 or on any ROP, neither in infants of <29 weeks GA, nor in infants of <1,000 g BW, nor in any GA strata. The risk ratio (95% confidence interval) for ROP stage ≥3 in infants of <29 weeks of GA was 1.13 (0.84, 1.53), p = 0.41 (quality of evidence: moderate). CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis detected no effects of early rhEPO on ROP in any comparison, but most stratified analyses were limited by low statistical power.
PICO Summary
Population
Infants of <29 weeks of gestational age (GA), (14 randomised controlled trials, n= 2,040).
Intervention
Early recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO).
Comparison
No treatment or placebo.
Outcome
Data syntheses showed no effects of rhEPO on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) stage ≥3 or on any ROP, neither in infants of <29 weeks GA, nor in infants of <1,000 g birth weight, nor in any GA strata. The risk ratio for ROP stage ≥3 in infants of <29 weeks of GA was 1.13; 95% confidence interval [0.84, 1.53], (quality of evidence: moderate).
-
5.
Impact of time and distance on outcomes following tourniquet use in civilian and military settings: A scoping review
Joarder M, Noureddine El Moussaoui H, Das A, Williamson F, Wullschleger M
Injury. 2023
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND The last two decades have seen the reintroduction of tourniquets into guidelines for the management of acute limb trauma requiring hemorrhage control. Evidence supporting tourniquet application has demonstrated low complication rates in modern military settings involving rapid evacuation timeframes. It is unclear how these findings translate to patients who have prolonged transport times from injury in rural settings. This scoping review investigates the relationship between time and distance on metabolic complications, limb salvage and mortality following tourniquet use in civilian and military settings. METHODS A systematic search strategy was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and SafetyLit databases. Study characteristics, setting, mechanism of injury, prehospital time, tourniquet time, distance, limb salvage, metabolic response, mortality, and tourniquet removal details were extracted from eligible studies. Descriptive statistics were recorded, and studies were grouped by ischemia time (< 2 h, 2-4 h, or > 4 h). RESULTS The search identified 3103 studies, from which 86 studies were included in this scoping review. Of the 86 studies, 55 studies were primarily in civilian environments and 32 were based in military settings. One study included both settings. Blast injury was the most common mechanism of injury sustained by patients in military settings (72.8% [5968/8200]) followed by penetrating injury (23.5% [1926/8200]). In contrast, in civilian settings penetrating injury was the most common mechanism (47.7% [1633/3426]) followed by blunt injury (36.4% [1246/3426]). Tourniquet time was reported in 66/86 studies. Tourniquet time over four hours was associated with reduced limb salvage rates (57.1%) and higher mortality rates (7.1%) compared with a tourniquet time of less than two hours. The overall limb salvage and mortality rates were 69.6% and 6.7% respectively. Metabolic outcomes were reported in 28/86 studies with smaller sample sizes and inconsistencies in which parameters were reported. CONCLUSION This scoping review presents literature describing comparatively safe tourniquet application when used for less than two hours duration. However, there is limited research describing prolonged tourniquet application or when used for protracted distances, such that the impact of tourniquet release time on metabolic outcomes and complications remains unclear. Prospective studies utilizing the development of an international database to provide this dataset is required.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients in civilian and military settings who had a tourniquet applied for the management of acute limb trauma (86 studies).
Intervention
Scoping review investigating the relationship between time and distance on metabolic complications, limb salvage and mortality following tourniquet use.
Comparison
Outcome
Most included studies (55) were based in civilian environments, 32 were based in military settings, and 1 included both settings. Blast injury was the most common mechanism of injury sustained by patients in military settings (72.8% [5968/8200]) followed by penetrating injury (23.5% [1926/8200]). In civilian settings, penetrating injury was the most common mechanism (47.7% [1633/3426]) followed by blunt injury (36.4% [1246/3426]). Tourniquet time was reported in 66/86 studies. Tourniquet time over four hours was associated with reduced limb salvage rates (57.1%) and higher mortality rates (7.1%) compared with a tourniquet time of less than two hours. The overall limb salvage and mortality rates were 69.6% and 6.7% respectively. Metabolic outcomes were reported in 28/86 studies with smaller sample sizes and inconsistencies in which parameters were reported.
-
6.
Effects of tranexamic acid treatment in severely and non-severely injured trauma patients
Ageron FX, Shakur-Still H, Roberts I
Transfusion. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urgent treatment with tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces bleeding deaths but there is disagreement about which patients should be treated. We examine the effects of TXA treatment in severely and non-severely injured trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We did an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials with over 1000 trauma patients that assessed the effects of TXA on survival. We defined the severity of injury according to characteristics at first assessment: systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg and a heart rate greater than 120 beats per minute or Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than nine or any GCS with one or more fixed dilated pupils. The primary measure was survival on the day of the injury. We examined the effect of TXA on survival in severely and non-severely injured patients and how these effects vary with the time from injury to treatment. RESULTS We obtained data for 32,944 patients from two randomized trials. Tranexamic acid significantly increased survival on the day of the injury (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.11-1.34; p < .01). The effect of tranexamic acid on survival in non-severely injured patients (OR = 1.25, 1.03-1.50) was similar to that in severely injured patients (OR = 1.22, 1.09-1.37) with no significant heterogeneity (p = .87). In severely and non-severely injured pateints, treatment within the first hour after injury was the most effective. DISCUSSION Early tranexamic acid treatment improves survival in both severely and non-severely injured trauma patients. Its use should not be restricted to the severely injured.
PICO Summary
Population
Severely and non-severely injured trauma patients enrolled in the two large randomised controlled trials: CRASH-2 and CRASH-3 (n= 32,944).
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (n= 16,499).
Comparison
Placebo (n= 16,445).
Outcome
Tranexamic acid significantly increased survival on the day of the injury (odd ratio (OR)= 1.22). The effect of tranexamic acid on survival in non-severely injured patients (OR= 1.25) was similar to that in severely injured patients (OR= 1.22) with no significant heterogeneity. In severely and non-severely injured patients, treatment within the first hour after injury was the most effective.
-
7.
The Impact of Pre-Hospital TXA on Mortality among Bleeding Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Almuwallad A, Cole E, Ross J, Perkins Z, Davenport R
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2021
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug associated with improved survival among trauma patients with haemorrhage. TXA is considered a primary haemostatic intervention in pre-hospital for treatment of bleeding alongside blood product transfusion. METHODS A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of pre-hospital TXA on mortality among trauma patients with bleeding. A systematic search was conducted using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS) library which contain the following of databases: EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, BNI, EMCARE, and HMIC. Other databases searched included SCOPUS and the Cochrane Central Register for Clinical Trials Library (CENTRAL). Quality assessment tools were applied among included studies; Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) for Randomised Control Trials RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort observational studies. RESULTS A total of 797 publications were identified from the initial database search. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, Four studies were included in the review and meta-analysis which identified a significant survival benefit in patients who received pre-hospital TXA vs no TXA. Three observational cohort and one RCT were included into the review with a total of 2347 patients (TXA: 1169 vs No TXA: 1178). There was a significant reduction in 24 hours mortality; Odds ratios (OR) 0.60 (95% CI: 0.37-0.99). No Statistical significant differences in 28 to 30 days mortality OR 0.69 (95% CI: 0.47-1.02), or VTE OR 1.49 (95% CI: 0.90 - 2.46) were found. CONCLUSION This review demonstrates that pre-hospital TXA is associated with significant reductions in the early (24 hour) mortality of trauma patients with suspected or confirmed haemorrhage but no increase in the incidence of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (I) Systematic review and meta-analysis.
PICO Summary
Population
Trauma patients with bleeding (4 studies, n= 2,347).
Intervention
Prehospital tranexamic acid (TXA, n= 1,169).
Comparison
No TXA (n= 1,178).
Outcome
There was a significant reduction in 24 hour mortality with pre-hospital TXA; (Odds ratios (OR) 0.60.) There were no statistically significant differences in 28 to 30 day mortality (OR 0.69), or VTE (OR 1.49).
-
8.
Sustained low-dose prophylactic early erythropoietin for improvement of neurological outcomes in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Liang L, Yu J, Xiao L, Wang G
Journal of affective disorders. 2021;282:1187-1192
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
The aim of this meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effects of different doses of prophylactic rhEPO on neurodevelopmental outcomes and provide reference for rational drug use. The primary outcome was the number of infants with a Mental Developmental Index (MDI) <70 on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Five RCTs, comprising 2282 infants, were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, prophylactic rhEPO administration reduced the incidence of infants with an MDI <70, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.55 (0.38-0.79), P <0.05. The low-dose rhEPO subgroup was superior to the placebo subgroup, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.47 (0.25-0.87), P <0.05. However, high-dose rhEPO subgroup had no significant impact on MDI <70 in infants <28 weeks' gestational age. The definitions of the secondary outcome showed that there was no significant effect of rhEPO on cerebral palsy. For neonatal complications, although four studies showed that there were no differences in the pooled results of BPD and ICH events between rhEPO treatment and placebo, the ICH events were significantly lower in the low-dose rhEPO (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.23-0.59). In addition, in the pooled results of NEC and ROP events, there were significant differences between the two groups (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.93) (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.98). And the NEC events were significantly lower in the low-dose rhEPO (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.27-0.73). Sustained low-dose prophylactic early erythropoietin might be more superior than high-dose for improvement of neurological outcomes and several neonatal complications in preterm infants.
PICO Summary
Population
Children who were born prematurely, aged between 18-24 months corrected age (n= 2,282, 5 RCTs).
Intervention
High-dose or low-dose prophylactic erythropoietin (rhEPO).
Comparison
Placebo.
Outcome
Overall, prophylactic rhEPO administration reduced the incidence of infants with a mental development index (MDI) <70, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.55 (0.38-0.79). The low-dose rhEPO subgroup was superior to the placebo subgroup, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.47 (0.25-0.87). However, high-dose rhEPO subgroup had no significant impact on MDI <70 in infants <28 weeks' gestational age. There was no significant effect of rhEPO on cerebral palsy. For neonatal complications, although four studies showed that there were no differences in the pooled results of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) events between rhEPO treatment and placebo, the ICH events were significantly lower in the low-dose rhEPO (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.23-0.59). In addition, in the pooled results of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and retinopathy of prematurity events, there were significant differences between the two groups (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.93), (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.98). And the NEC events were significantly lower in the low-dose rhEPO (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.27-0.73).
-
9.
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iron Therapy for Treating Anaemia in Critically ill Adults: A Rapid Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
Geneen LJ, Kimber C, Doree C, Stanworth S, Shah A
Transfusion medicine reviews. 2021
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Our objective was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) iron therapy for treating anaemia in critically ill adults (>16 years) admitted to intensive care or high dependency units. We excluded quasi-RCTs and other not truly randomised trials. We searched 7 electronic databases (including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase) using a pre-defined search strategy from inception to June 14, 2021. One reviewer screened, extracted, and analysed data, with verification by a second reviewer of all decisions. We used Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) 1 and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. We reported 3 comparisons across 1198 patients, in 8 RCTs: (1) IV iron vs control (7 RCTs, 748 participants); our primary outcome (hemoglobin (Hb) concentration at 10 to 30 days) was reported in 7 of the 8 included trials. There was evidence of an effect (very-low certainty) in favour of IV iron over control in the main comparison only (6 RCTs, n = 528, mean difference (MD) 0.52g/dL [95%CI 0.23, 0.81], P = .0005). For the remaining outcomes there was no evidence of an effect in either direction (low certainty of evidence for Hb concentration at <10 days; very-low certainty of evidence for hospital duration, ICU duration, hospital readmission, infection, mortality; HRQoL outcomes were not GRADED). (2) IV iron + subcutaneous erythropoietin (EPO) vs control (2 RCTs, 104 participants); reported outcomes showed no evidence of effect in either direction, based on very-low certainty evidence (Hb concentration at 10-30 days, and <10 days, infection, mortality). (3) Hepcidin-guided treatment with IV iron or iron+ EPO vs standard care (1 RCT, 399 participants) reported evidence of an effect in favour of the intervention for 90-day mortality (low certainty of evidence), but no other group differences for the reported outcomes (low certainty evidence for Hb concentration at 10-30 days, hospital duration; HRQoL was not GRADED). The evidence across all comparisons was downgraded for high and unclear ROB for lack of blinding, incomplete outcome data, baseline imbalance, and imprecision around the estimate (wide CIs and small sample size). In conclusion, the current evidence continues to support further investigation into the role for iron therapy in increasing Hb in critically ill patients. Recent, small, trials have begun to focus on patient-centred outcomes but a large, well conducted, and adequately powered trial is needed to inform clinical practice.
PICO Summary
Population
Critically ill adults admitted to intensive care or high dependency units (8 studies, n= 1,198).
Intervention
Intravenous (IV) iron therapy; IV iron and subcutaneous erythropoietin (EPO); Hepcidin and targeted IV iron treatment (with and without EPO).
Comparison
Placebo/no iron therapy, or EPO therapy; Standard care.
Outcome
Seven trials (n= 748) comparing IV vs. control, found evidence of an effect in favour of IV iron in the main comparison only (6 RCTs, n = 528, mean difference (MD) 0.52g/dL). There was no evidence of an effect in either direction for hospital duration, intensive care unit duration, hospital readmission, infection, and mortality. For the two trials (n= 104) comparing IV iron and subcutaneous erythropoietin (EPO) vs. control, the reported outcomes showed no evidence of effect in either direction (Hb concentration at 10-30 days, and <10 days, infection, mortality). One trial (n= 399) comparing hepcidin-guided treatment with IV iron or iron and EPO vs. standard care reported evidence of an effect in favour of the intervention for 90-day mortality, but no other group differences for Hb concentration at 10-30 days, hospital duration, and HRQoL.
-
10.
Tranexamic acid is associated with reduced mortality, hemorrhagic expansion, and vascular occlusive events in traumatic brain injury - meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
July J, Pranata R
BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):119
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) on traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS We performed a systematic literature search on topics that compared intravenous TXA to placebo in patients with TBI up until January 2020 from several electronic databases. RESULTS There were 30.522 patients from 7 studies. Meta-analysis showed that TXA was associated with reduced mortality (RR 0.92 [0.88, 0.97], p = 0.002; I(2): 0%) and hemorrhagic expansion (RR 0.79 [0.64, 0.97], p = 0.03; I(2): 0%). Both TXA and control group has a similar need for neurosurgical intervention (p = 0.87) and unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) (p = 0.59). The rate for vascular occlusive events (p = 0.09), and its deep vein thrombosis subgroup (p = 0.23), pulmonary embolism subgroup (p = 1), stroke subgroup (p = 0.38), and myocardial infarction subgroup (p = 0.15) were similar in both groups. Subgroup analysis on RCTs with low risk of bias showed that TXA was associated with reduced mortality and hemorrhagic expansion. TXA was associated with reduced vascular occlusive events (RR 0.85 [0.73, 0.99], p = 0.04; I(2): 4%). GRADE was performed for the RCT with low risk of bias subgroup, it showed a high certainty of evidence for lower mortality, less hemorrhage expansion, and similar need for neurosurgical intervention in TXA group compared to placebo group. CONCLUSION TXA was associated with reduced mortality and hemorrhagic expansion but similar need for neurosurgical intervention and unfavorable GOS. Vascular occlusive events were slightly lower in TXA group on subgroup analysis of RCTs with low risk of bias.
PICO Summary
Population
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients (7 studies, n=30522).
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (TXA).
Comparison
Placebo.
Outcome
TXA was associated with reduced mortality and hemorrhagic expansion. Both TXA and control group has a similar need for neurosurgical intervention and unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale. The rate for vascular occlusive events, and its deep vein thrombosis subgroup, pulmonary embolism subgroup, stroke subgroup, and myocardial infarction subgroup were similar in both groups. Subgroup analysis on RCTs with low risk of bias showed that TXA was associated with reduced mortality and hemorrhagic expansion. TXA was associated with reduced vascular occlusive events.