0
selected
-
1.
Pre-hospital freeze-dried plasma for critical bleeding after trauma: A pilot randomized controlled trial
Mitra B, Meadley B, Bernard S, Maegele M, Gruen RL, Bradley O, Wood EM, McQuilten ZK, Fitzgerald M, St Clair T, et al
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Transfusion of a high ratio of plasma to packed red blood cells (PRBC), to treat or prevent acute traumatic coagulopathy, has been associated with survival after major trauma. However, the effect of pre-hospital plasma on patient outcomes has been inconsistent. The aim of this pilot trial was to assess the feasibility of transfusing freeze-dried plasma with red blood cells (RBC) using a randomized controlled design in an Australian aeromedical pre-hospital setting. METHODS Patients attended by Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) paramedics with suspected critical bleeding after trauma managed with pre-hospital RBC were randomized to receive two units of freeze-dried plasma (Lyoplas N-w) or standard care (no plasma). The primary outcome was the proportion of eligible patients enrolled and provided the intervention. Secondary outcomes included preliminary data on effectiveness, including mortality censored at 24 hours and at hospital discharge, and adverse events. RESULTS During the study period of 01 June to 31 October 2022, there were 25 eligible patients, of whom 20 (80%) were enrolled in the trial and 19 (76%) received the allocated intervention. Median time from randomization to hospital arrival was 92.5 mins (IQR 68-101.5). Mortality may have been lower in the freeze-dried plasma group at 24h (RR 0.24; 95%CI: 0.03 - 1.73) and at hospital discharge (RR 0.73; 95%CI: 0.24 - 2.27). No serious adverse events related to the trial interventions were reported. CONCLUSIONS This first reported experience of freeze-dried plasma use in Australia suggests pre-hospital administration is feasible. Given longer prehospital times typically associated with HEMS attendance, there is potential clinical benefit from this intervention and rationale for a definitive trial.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients attended by Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) paramedics with suspected critical bleeding after trauma (n= 20).
Intervention
Two units of freeze-dried plasma (Lyoplas N-w), (n= 9).
Comparison
Standard care (no plasma), (n= 11).
Outcome
The primary outcome was the proportion of eligible patients enrolled and provided the intervention. Secondary outcomes included preliminary data on effectiveness, including mortality censored at 24 hours and at hospital discharge, and adverse events. Nineteen patients (76%) received the allocated intervention. Median time from randomization to hospital arrival was 92.5 mins (IQR 68-101.5). Mortality may have been lower in the freeze-dried plasma group at 24h (RR 0.24; 95% CI [0.03, 1.73]) and at hospital discharge (RR 0.73; 95% CI [0.24, 2.27]. No serious adverse events related to the trial interventions were reported.
-
2.
Prehospital plasma is associated with survival principally in patients transferred from the scene of injury: A secondary analysis of the PAMPer trial
Lewis RE, Muluk SL, Reitz KM, Guyette FX, Brown JB, Miller RS, Harbrecht BG, Claridge JA, Phelan HA, Yazer MH, et al
Surgery. 2022
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to characterize if prehospital transfer origin from the scene of injury (SCENE) or from a referral emergency department (REF) alters the survival benefit attributable to prehospital plasma resuscitation in patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of data from a recently completed prehospital plasma clinical trial. All of the enrolled patients from either the SCENE or REF groups were included. The demographics, injury characteristics, shock severity and resuscitation needs were compared. The primary outcome was a 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox-hazard regression were used to characterize the independent survival benefits of prehospital plasma for transport origin groups. RESULTS Of the 501 enrolled patients, the REF group patients (n = 111) accounted for 22% with the remaining (n = 390) originating from the scene. The SCENE group patients had higher injury severity and were more likely intubated prehospital. The REF group patients had longer prehospital times and received greater prehospital crystalloid and blood products. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant 30-day survival benefit associated with prehospital plasma in the SCENE group (P < .01) with no difference found in the REF group patients (P = .36). The Cox-regression verified after controlling for relevant confounders that prehospital plasma was independently associated with a 30-day survival in the SCENE group patients (hazard ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.89; P = .01) with no significant relationship found in the REF group patients (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.4-3.0). CONCLUSION Important differences across the SCENE and REF cohorts exist that are essential to understand when planning prehospital studies. Prehospital plasma is associated with a survival benefit primarily in SCENE group patients. The results are exploratory but suggest transfer origin may be an important determinant of prehospital plasma benefit.
PICO Summary
Population
Severely injured trauma patients enrolled in the PAMPer trial (n= 501).
Intervention
Thawed plasma (n= 230).
Comparison
Standard pre-hospital air medical care (n= 271).
Outcome
For this secondary analysis of the PAMPer trial, the study population was composed of 390 (78%) patients with an air medical transfer origin from the scene of injury (SCENE) and 111 (22%) patients transferred from an outside referral emergency department (REF). Randomization to plasma or standard of care was equally distributed across each transfer origin group. The SCENE group had higher injury severity and were more likely intubated pre-hospital. The REF group had longer pre-hospital times and received greater pre-hospital crystalloid and blood products. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant 30-day survival benefit associated with pre-hospital plasma in the SCENE group with no difference found in the REF group. The Cox-regression verified after controlling for relevant confounders that pre-hospital plasma was independently associated with a 30-day survival in the SCENE group with no significant relationship found in the REF group.
-
3.
Plasma trial: Pilot randomized clinical trial to determine safety and efficacy of plasma transfusions
Carson JL, Ness PM, Pagano MB, Philipp CS, Bracey AWJr, Brooks MM, Nosher JL, Hogshire L, Noveck H, Triulzi DJ
Transfusion. 2021
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plasma is frequently administered to patients with prolonged INR prior to invasive procedures. However, there is limited evidence evaluating efficacy and safety. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We performed a pilot trial in hospitalized patients with INR between 1.5 and 2.5 undergoing procedures conducted outside the operating room. We excluded patients undergoing procedures proximal to the central nervous system, platelet counts <40,000/μl, or congenital or acquired coagulation disorders unresponsive to plasma. We randomly allocated patients stratified by hospital and history of cirrhosis to receive plasma transfusion (10-15 cc/kg) or no transfusion. The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin concentration within 2 days of procedure. RESULTS We enrolled 57 patients, mean age 56.0, 34 (59.6%) with cirrhosis, and mean INR 1.92 (SD = 0.27). In the intention to treat analysis, there were 10 of 27 (38.5%) participants in the plasma arm with a post procedure INR <1.5 and one of 30 (3.6%) in the no treatment arm (p < .01). The mean INR after receiving plasma transfusion was -0.24 (SD 0.26) lower than baseline. The change from pre-procedure hemoglobin level to lowest level within 2 days was -0.6 (SD = 1.0) in the plasma transfusion arm and -0.4 (SD = 0.6) in the no transfusion arm (p = .29). Adverse outcomes were uncommon. DISCUSSION We found no differences in change in hemoglobin concentration in those treated with plasma compared to no treatment. The change in INR was small and corrected to less than 1.5 in minority of patients. Large trials are required to establish if plasma is safe and efficacious.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with cirrhosis (n= 57).
Intervention
Plasma transfusion (n= 27).
Comparison
No transfusion (n= 30).
Outcome
In the intention to treat analysis, there were 10 of 27 (38.5%) participants in the plasma arm with a post procedure INR <1.5 and one of 30 (3.6%) in the no treatment arm. The mean INR after receiving plasma transfusion was -0.24 (SD 0.26) lower than baseline. The change from pre-procedure haemoglobin level to lowest level within 2 days was -0.6 (SD = 1.0) in the plasma transfusion arm and -0.4 (SD = 0.6) in the no transfusion arm. Adverse outcomes were uncommon.
-
4.
CHARACTERIZATION OF UNEXPECTED SURVIVORS FOLLOWING A PREHOSPITAL PLASMA RANDOMIZED TRIAL
Gruen DS, Guyette FX, Brown JB, Daley BJ, Miller RS, Harbrecht BG, Claridge JA, Phelan HA, Yazer MH, Neal MD, et al
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehospital plasma improves survival for severely injured trauma patients transported by air ambulance. We sought to characterize the unexpected survivors, patients who survived despite having high predicted mortality following traumatic injury. METHODS The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial randomized severely injured patients (n=501) to receive either standard care (crystalloid) or two units of prehospital plasma followed by standard care fluid resuscitation. We built a generalized linear model to estimate patient mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance. We defined unexpected survivors as patients who had a predicted mortality >50% and survived to 30 days. We characterized patient demographics, clinical features, and outcomes of the unexpected survivors. Observed to expected (O/E) ratios and Z-statistics were calculated using model-estimated mortality for each cohort. RESULTS Our model predicted mortality better than ISS or RTS parameters and identified 36 unexpected survivors. Compared to expected survivors, unexpected survivors were younger (33 [24, 52] vs. 47 [32, 59] years, P=0.013), were more severely injured (ISS 34 [22, 50] vs. 18 [10, 27], P<0.001), had worse organ dysfunction and hospital resource outcomes (MOF, ICU and hospital length of stay, and ventilator days), and were more likely to receive prehospital plasma (67 vs. 46%, P=0.031). Nonsurvivors with high predicted mortality were more likely to receive standard care resuscitation (P<0.001). Unexpected survivors who received prehospital plasma had a lower observed to expected mortality than those that received standard care resuscitation (O/E 0.56 [0.33-0.84] vs. 1.0 [0.73-1.32]). The number of prehospital plasma survivors (24) exceeded the number of predicted survivors (n=10) estimated by our model (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Prehospital plasma is associated with an increase in the number of unexpected survivors following severe traumatic injury. Prehospital interventions may improve the probability of survival for injured patients with high predicted mortality based on early injury characteristics, vital signs, and resuscitation measures.Secondary Analysis LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
PICO Summary
Population
Severely injured patients enrolled in the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial (n=501).
Intervention
Two units of prehospital plasma followed by standard care fluid resuscitation (n=230).
Comparison
Standard care (crystalloid) (n=271).
Outcome
The generalized linear model to estimate patient mortality predicted mortality better than ISS or RTS parameters and identified 36 unexpected survivors. Compared to expected survivors, unexpected survivors were younger, were more severely injured, had worse organ dysfunction and hospital resource outcomes, and were more likely to receive prehospital plasma (67 vs. 46%). Non-survivors with high predicted mortality were more likely to receive standard care resuscitation. Unexpected survivors who received prehospital plasma had a lower observed to expected mortality than those that received standard care resuscitation. The number of prehospital plasma survivors (24) exceeded the number of predicted survivors (10) estimated by the model.
-
5.
Efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of severe influenza
Xu Z, Zhou J, Huang Y, Liu X, Xu Y, Chen S, Liu D, Lin Z, Liu X, Li Y
Crit Care. 2020;24(1):469
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convalescent plasma administration may be of clinical benefit in patients with severe influenza, but reports on the efficacy of this therapy vary. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the administration of convalescent plasma to treat severe influenza. Healthcare databases were searched in February 2020. All records were screened against eligibility criteria, and the risks of bias were assessed. The primary outcome was the fatality rate. RESULTS A total of 2861 studies were retrieved and screened. Five eligible RCTs were identified. Pooled analyses yielded no evidence that using convalescent plasma to treat severe influenza resulted in significant reductions in mortality (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.51-2·23; P = 0.87; I(2) = 35%), number of days in the intensive care unit, or number of days on mechanical ventilation. This treatment may have the possible benefits of increasing hemagglutination inhibition titers and reducing influenza B viral loads and cytokine levels. No serious adverse events were reported. The included studies were generally of high quality with a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS The administration of convalescent plasma appears safe but may not reduce the mortality, number of days in the intensive care unit, or number of days on mechanical ventilation in patients with severe influenza.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients hospitalized with severe influenza (5 studies, n= 598).
Intervention
Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune intravenous immunoglobulin (H-IVIG).
Comparison
Various comparators (normal intravenous immunoglobulin, standard care, low-titre anti-influenza, placebo).
Outcome
Pooled analyses yielded no evidence that using convalescent plasma to treat severe influenza resulted in significant reductions in mortality, number of days in the intensive care unit, or number of days on mechanical ventilation.
-
6.
Association of Prehospital Plasma Transfusion With Survival in Trauma Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock When Transport Times Are Longer Than 20 Minutes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PAMPer and COMBAT Clinical Trials
Pusateri AE, Moore EE, Moore HB, Le TD, Guyette FX, Chapman MP, Sauaia A, Ghasabyan A, Chandler J, McVaney K, et al
JAMA surgery. 2019;:e195085
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Importance: Both military and civilian clinical practice guidelines include early plasma transfusion to achieve a plasma to red cell ratio approaching 1:1 to 1:2. However, it was not known how early plasma should be given for optimal benefit. Two recent randomized clinical trials were published, with apparently contradictory results. The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) clinical trial showed a nearly 30% reduction in mortality with plasma transfusion in the prehospital environment, while the Control of Major Bleeding After Trauma (COMBAT) clinical trial showed no survival improvement. Objective: To facilitate a post hoc combined analysis of the COMBAT and PAMPer trials to examine questions that could not be answered by either clinical trial alone. We hypothesized that prehospital transport time influenced the effects of prehospital plasma on 28-day mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 626 patients in the 2 clinical trials were included. Patients with trauma and hemorrhagic shock were randomly assigned to receive either standard care or 2 U of thawed plasma followed by standard care in the prehospital environment. Data analysis was performed between September 2018 and January 2019. Interventions: Prehospital transfusion of 2 U of plasma compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: In this post hoc analysis of 626 patients (467 men [74.6%] and 159 women [25.4%]; median [interquartile range] age, 42 [27-57] years) who had trauma with hemorrhagic shock, a Cox regression analysis showed a significant overall survival benefit for plasma (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90; P = .01) after adjustment for injury severity, age, and clinical trial cohort (COMBAT or PAMPer). A significant association with prehospital transport time was detected (from arrival on scene to arrival at the trauma center). Increased mortality was observed in patients in the standard care group when prehospital transport was longer than 20 minutes (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05-4.30; P = .04), while increased mortality was not observed in patients in the prehospital plasma group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.51; P = .46). No serious adverse events were associated with prehospital plasma transfusion. Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that prehospital plasma is associated with a survival benefit when transport times are longer than 20 minutes and that the benefit-risk ratio is favorable for use of prehospital plasma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01838863 (COMBAT) and NCT01818427 (PAMPer).
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with trauma and hemorrhagic shock (n=626).
Intervention
Plasma group: prehospital transfusion of 2 U of thawed plasma followed by standard care in the prehospital environment, (n=297).
Comparison
Standard care group: crystalloid-based resuscitation, (n=329).
Outcome
A Cox regression analysis showed a significant overall survival benefit for plasma (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65) after adjustment for injury severity, age, and clinical trial cohort (COMBAT or PAMPer). A significant association with prehospital transport time was detected (from arrival on scene to arrival at the trauma center). Increased mortality was observed in patients in the standard care group when prehospital transport was longer than 20 minutes (HR, 2.12), while increased mortality was not observed in patients in the prehospital plasma group (HR, 0.78). No serious adverse events were associated with prehospital plasma transfusion.