1.
Results of clinical effectiveness of conventional versus Mirasol-treated Apheresis Platelets in Patients with Hypoproliferative Thrombocytopenia (MiPLATE) trial
Koepsell, S. A., Stolla, M., Sedjo, R. L., Carson, J., Knudson, M., Cook, R., Fasano, R., Ngamsuntikul, S. G., Cohn, C., Gorlin, J., et al
Transfusion. 2024
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Mirasol® Pathogen Reduction Technology System was developed to reduce transfusion-transmitted diseases in platelet (PLT) products. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS MiPLATE trial was a prospective, multicenter, controlled, randomized, non-inferiority (NI) study of the clinical effectiveness of conventional versus Mirasol-treated Apheresis PLTs in participants with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. The novel primary endpoint was days of ≥Grade 2 bleeding with an NI margin of 1.6. RESULTS After 330 participants were randomized, a planned interim analysis of 297 participants (145 MIRASOL, 152 CONTROL) receiving ≥1 study transfusion found a 2.79-relative rate (RR) in the MIRASOL compared to the CONTROL in number of days with ≥Grade 2 bleeding (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-4.67). The proportion of subjects with ≥Grade 2 bleeding was 40.0% (n = 58) in MIRASOL and 30.3% (n = 46) in CONTROL (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.97-1.81, p = .08). Corrected count increments were lower (p < .01) and the number of PLT transfusion episodes per participant was higher (RR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.41) in MIRASOL. There was no difference in the days of PLT support (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% CI 0.68-1.08) or total number of red blood cell transfusions (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.91-1.37) between MIRASOL versus CONTROL. Transfusion emergent adverse events were reported in 119 MIRASOL participants (84.4%) compared to 133 (82.6%) participants in CONTROL (p = NS). DISCUSSION This study did not support that MIRASOL was non-inferior compared to conventional platelets using the novel endpoint number of days with ≥Grade 2 bleeding in MIRASOL when compared to CONTROL.
PICO Summary
Population
Participants with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusions, enrolled in the MiPLATE trial (n= 297).
Intervention
Mirasol-treated plasma-stored apheresis platelets (Mirasol group, n= 145).
Comparison
Conventional plasma-stored apheresis platelets (Control group, n= 152).
Outcome
The novel primary endpoint was days of ≥Grade 2 bleeding with a non-inferiority margin of 1.6. Participants in the Mirasol group had more days of grade ≥2 bleeding than participants in the Control group (RR 2.74; 95% CI [1.66, 4.53]), the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints showed a similar proportion of participants in each group with days of grade ≥2 bleeding and no difference in red blood cell transfusion despite a higher rate of participants with platelets refractoriness, platelet transfusions, and lower corrected count increments in the Mirasol group.
2.
A prospective phase II randomized study of deferasirox to prevent iatrogenic iron overload in patients undertaking induction/consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia
Kennedy GA, Morris KL, Subramonpillai E, Curley C, Butler J, Durrant S
British Journal of Haematology. 2013;161((6):):794-801.
Abstract
This prospective randomized phase II study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of deferasirox in preventing iatrogenic iron overload in patients receiving induction/consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) ize. Serum ferritin, transferrin saturation and CRP were measured pre-, mid- and post- each chemotherapy cycle. Patients were randomized to receive either therapy with deferasirox vs. no deferasirox therapy once serum ferritin increased to >500ug/l. The trial was stopped prematurely due to excess gastrointestinal (GI) and infectious toxicity demonstrable in the deferasirox arm, after 10 patients had been randomized to deferasirox and 6 patients to the control arm. Overall, deferasirox was poorly tolerated, with median maximum tolerated dose only 13.8 mg/kg/d and no patient able to tolerate doses >20mg/kg/d. Median duration of deferasirox therapy was only 72d (range 19-130d), with 9/10 patients requiring unplanned dose interruptions and 4/10 patients unable to continue the drug predominantly due to GI effects. Although all 3 treatment-related deaths occurred in the deferasirox arm (P=0.25), median overall survival was similar between treatment arms. Use of deferasirox to prevent iatrogenic iron overload in AML patients undertaking induction/consolidation is poorly tolerated and appears to be associated with excess GI and infectious toxicity. 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
3.
Evaluation of quality of life and analysis of efficacy and safety of two iron chelators in patients with iron overload
Medrano-Engay B, Irún P, Sarría L, Andrade M, Murillo I, Montes A, Pocoví M, Giraldo P
Haematologica. 2013;98((S1):):704.. Abstract No. B1817.
5.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of deferasirox (Exjade) in patients with low/intermediate-1 risk MDS and transfusional iron overload
Angelucci E, Bowen D, Magalhaes SMM, Lawniczek T, Douma S, Jakobs P, Garcia-Manero G
Blood. 2009;114((22):): Abstract No. 4854 .
6.
Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous bolus injection of deferoxamine in adult patients with iron overload
Franchini M, Gandini G, de Gironcoli M, Vassanelli A, Borgna-Pignatti C, Aprili G
Blood. 2000;95((9):):2776-9.
Abstract
We compared 48-hour urinary iron excretion after a twice-daily subcutaneous bolus injection of deferoxamine and after 12 hours of subcutaneous continuous infusion of the drug in 27 patients with iron overload (mean age, 55.7 years). In most patients, the iron overload was due to multiple transfusions administered during chemotherapy or as part of supportive care for a hematologic or oncologic disorder. One patient had sickle cell anemia and 1 had hereditary hemochromatosis and spherocytosis. Similar urinary iron excretion was observed with the 2 methods of administration; mean +/- SD values were 6935.3 +/- 3832.3 microg/48 hours with subcutaneous bolus injection and 6630.4 +/- 3606.9 microg/48 hours with subcutaneous continuous infusion (P =.3). Twenty-six patients (96.3%) chose to continue therapy with bolus injection. The long-term efficacy of bolus injection was evaluated by measuring the serum ferritin concentration at regular intervals for a follow-up time of 20.1 +/- 4.5 months. Ferritin concentration decreased to below 1000 microg/L in 73% of the patients and to below 500 microg/L in 42% and became normal in 26%. Best results were obtained in patients who were no longer receiving blood transfusions when chelation therapy was initiated. Three of 26 patients (11.5%) had mild, transient side effects after bolus injection. Larger prospective, randomized studies must be conducted before deferoxamine bolus injection can be routinely recommended for patients with iron overload. (Blood. 2000;95:2776-2779)
7.
A comparison of filtered leukocyte-reduced and cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative blood products for the prevention of transfusion-associated CMV infection after marrow transplant
Bowden RA, Slichter SJ, Sayers M, Weisdorf D, Cays M, Schoch G, Banaji M, Haake R, Welk K, Fisher L
Blood. 1995;86((9):):3598-3603.