Editor's Choice
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Jan 23;13(1):5 doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00358-4.
POPULATION:
Children or adults without known inherited bleeding disorders undergoing surgery or other invasive procedures (63 randomised controlled trials, n= 4,163). INTERVENTION:Desmopressin administered intravenously or subcutaneously before, during, or immediately after a surgical or interventional procedure. COMPARISON:Placebo, usual care, or antifibrinolytic agents. OUTCOME:Meta-analyses demonstrated that desmopressin likely does not reduce the risk of receiving a red blood cell transfusion (25 trials, risk ratio [RR] 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.86, 1.05]) and may not reduce the risk of reoperation due to bleeding (22 trials, RR 0.75; 95% CI [0.47, 1.19]) when compared to placebo or usual care. However, the authors demonstrated significant reductions in number of units of red blood cells transfused (25 trials, mean difference -0.55 units; 95% CI [-0.94, -0.15]), total volume of blood loss (33 trials, standardized mean difference - 0.40 standard deviations; 95% CI [-0.56, -0.23]), and the risk of bleeding events (2 trials, RR 0.45; 95% CI [0.24, 0.84]). The certainty of evidence of these findings was generally low. We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the effects of peri-procedural desmopressin in patients without known inherited bleeding disorders undergoing surgery or other invasive procedures. We included 63 randomized trials (4163 participants) published up to February 1, 2023. Seven trials were published after a 2017 Cochrane systematic review on this topic. There were 38 trials in cardiac surgery, 22 in noncardiac surgery, and 3 in non-surgical procedures. Meta-analyses demonstrated that desmopressin likely does not reduce the risk of receiving a red blood cell transfusion (25 trials, risk ratio [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 1.05) and may not reduce the risk of reoperation due to bleeding (22 trials, RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.19) when compared to placebo or usual care. However, we demonstrated significant reductions in number of units of red blood cells transfused (25 trials, mean difference -0.55 units, 95% CI - 0.94 to - 0.15), total volume of blood loss (33 trials, standardized mean difference - 0.40 standard deviations; 95% CI - 0.56 to - 0.23), and the risk of bleeding events (2 trials, RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84). The certainty of evidence of these findings was generally low. Desmopressin increased the risk of clinically significant hypotension that required intervention (19 trials, RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.41). Limited evidence suggests that tranexamic acid is more effective than desmopressin in reducing transfusion risk (3 trials, RR 2.38 favoring tranexamic acid, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.39) and total volume of blood loss (3 trials, mean difference 391.7 mL favoring tranexamic acid, 95% CI - 93.3 to 876.7 mL). No trials directly informed the safety and hemostatic efficacy of desmopressin in advanced kidney disease. In conclusion, desmopressin likely reduces periprocedural blood loss and the number of units of blood transfused in small trials with methodologic limitations. However, the risk of hypotension needs to be mitigated. Large trials should evaluate desmopressin alongside tranexamic acid and enroll patients with advanced kidney disease. |
|
|
Editor's Choice
Int J Urol. 2022 Dec;29(12):1535-1542 doi: 10.1111/iju.15036.
POPULATION:
Patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (n= 140). INTERVENTION:PCNL after tract infiltration with norepinephrine (NE) (NE-PCNL group, n= 70). COMPARISON:PCNL after tract infiltration with normal saline (S-PCNL group, n= 70). OUTCOME:The primary outcome was procedure-related blood loss. The median blood loss was 378 ml (IQR= 252, 504) in the NE-PCNL group versus 592 ml (IQR= 378, 756) in the S-PCNL group. Haemoglobin and haematocrit deficits were lower in NE-PCNL. Patients in the NE-PCNL group had a higher immediate stone-free rate (80%) compared with those of the S-PCNL group (70%). No statistical differences were found in the final stone free rate. The reported overall complications between the two groups were similar. Bleeding-related complications were 1 (1.4%) versus 10 (14.3%) for NE-PCNL and S-PCNL, respectively.
PURPOSE:
To determine the efficacy and safety of trajectory infiltration with 1:150 000 Norepinephrine (NE) in reducing blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is a prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. In all, 140 consecutive patients underwent PCNL for the management of large renal calculi. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to one of either study groups, the NE-PCNL group (70 patients whose PCNL-trajectory was infiltrated by NE) or the Placebo group (saline PCNL) (70 patients whose PCNL tracts were infiltrated by normal saline). Procedure-related blood loss (the primary outcome) was assessed and statistically analyzed. Also, all other procedure-related events and complications were recorded and compared. RESULTS:The median blood loss was 378 ml (IQR: 252-504) in the NE-PCNL group versus 592 ml (IQR: 378-756) in the S-PCNL group (p < 0.0001). In addition, Hemoglobin and Hematocrit deficits were lower in NE-PCNL (p < 0.05). Patients who were randomized to the NE-PCNL group had a higher immediate stone-free rate (SFR) (80%) compared with those of the S-PCNL group (70%) (p = 0.034). However, no statistical differences were found in the final SFR. The reported overall complications between the 2 groups were similar (p > 0.05). Indeed, bleeding-related complications were 1 (1.4%) versus 10 (14.3%) for NE-PCNL and S-PCNL, respectively (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS:Trajectory infiltration of PCNL tracts by NE was found to be effective and safe in mitigation of PCNL-related blood loss. This step is a timeless and cost-effective as NE is readily available in surgical theaters and of very low cost. |