-
1.
Effect of intravenous low-dose norepinephrine on blood loss in non-tourniquet total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, single-center trial
Chen, S., Luo, F., Lin, Y., Yu, G., Luo, J., Xu, J.
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2023;18(1):933
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This prospective trial aimed to evaluate the effects of low-dose intravenous norepinephrine (NE) on intraoperative blood loss and bleeding from osteotomy sites during non-tourniquet total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under general anesthesia. METHODS A total of 120 patients who underwent TKA between December 2020 and May 2022 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the intravenous low-dose NE Group (NE Group) or the control group (C Group). During surgery, NE Group received 0.05-0.1 μg/(kg min) of NE intravenously to raise and maintain the patient's mean arterial pressure (MAP). C Group received the same dose of saline as placebo. Intraoperative blood loss, bleeding score at osteotomy sites, Δlactate levels (Lac), postoperative complications, and transfusion rate during hospitalization were compared between groups. RESULTS Intraoperative and osteotomy blood loss was significantly lower in the NE Group than in the C Group (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in ΔLac between groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in complications between the groups 3 days after surgery (P > 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in blood transfusion rates between the two groups during hospitalization (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION In non-tourniquet TKA under general anesthesia, low-dose intravenous NE safely and effectively reduced intraoperative blood loss and provided a satisfactory osteotomy site while maintaining a higher MAP.
-
2.
General Anesthesia Versus Regional Anesthesia in the Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Cao, M. M., Zhang, Y. W., Sheng, R. W., Gao, W., Kang, Q. R., Gao, Y. C., Qiu, X. D., Rui, Y. F.
World Journal of Surgery. 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is the preferred treatment option for the elderly patients with hip fractures. However, the choice of general anesthesia (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA) remains controversial. The quality of evidence has further improved with the advent of several high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the last two years. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of two anesthetic techniques in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgeries. METHODS Eligible studies were identified from PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE and reference lists from January 2000 to June 2022 in this current systematic review and meta-analysis. The outcomes included the surgery-related outcomes (duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, intraoperative blood loss and number of transfusions) and postoperative outcomes (30-day mortality, postoperative delirium,cardiovascular events and other complications). RESULTS A total of 10 RCTs were included, and a total of 3594 patients were analyzed. RA was associated with shorter duration of surgery, shorter length of hospital stays and less intraoperative blood loss compared to GA. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of blood transfusions, duration of anesthesia, 30-day mortality or postoperative delirium. CONCLUSIONS Our pooled analysis identified no significant differences in terms of the safety between RA and GA, while RA reduces intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stays and duration of surgery. These results suggest that RA appears to be preferable for the elderly patients with hip fractures.
-
3.
Preoperative administration of local infiltration anaesthesia decreases perioperative blood loss during total knee arthroplasty - a randomised controlled trial
Lapidus O, Baekkevold M, Rotzius P, Lapidus LJ, Eriksson K
Journal of experimental orthopaedics. 2022;9(1):118
Abstract
PURPOSE Local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) consisting of ropivacaine, epinephrine and ketorolac administered at the end of surgery has become the gold standard for postoperative analgesia as it provides improved postoperative pain relief compared to other methods. The use of LIA has retrospectively been shown to be associated with decreased perioperative blood loss. However, no randomised controlled trials have examined the effect of of preoperative LIA on blood loss. This study aimed to compare pre- vs perioperative LIA during TKA surgery, with a primary outcome of perioperative blood loss. METHODS The present study was performed as a prospective single-center randomised controlled trial. A total of 100 patients undergoing primary TKA between October 2016 and March 2018 were randomised to receive either pre- or perioperative LIA. Perioperative blood loss was measured, as well as pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels. Postoperative pain was estimated at intervals approximately 24, 48 and 72 hours after surgery; analgesic drug consumption was recorded for each patient, as well as the total length of stay as an in-patient. RESULTS Ninety six patients received either pre- or perioperative LIA as part of the intervention and control group respectively. Average blood loss was 39% lower in the intervention group at 130 ml vs 212 ml in the control group (p=0.002). No significant difference in haemoglobin drop, postoperative pain or length of hospital stay was found. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative LIA resulted in a 39% decrease in perioperative blood loss during TKA surgery compared to perioperative administration while providing non-inferior postoperative pain relief.
-
4.
Effect of Dexmedetomidine infusion during hip fracture surgery on hemodynamic parameters and blood loss: A triple-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
Hazrati E, Vosoughi F, Chamanara M, Teymourian H
Injury. 2021
Abstract
Introduction In this study, we aim to assess the intra-operative effect of dexmedetomidine administration on the hemodynamic parameters and bleeding volume during hip fracture surgery. Patients and methods we designed and implemented a triple-blinded randomized clinical trial to objectively compare the effects of 0.5 µg/kg/h infusion of dexmedetomidine with placebo (equal amount of normal saline) during hip fracture surgery. All included cases were between 30 and 70 years old and underwent surgery for fixation of a proximal femur fracture from September 26, 2020 until February 15, 2021. They were all ASA class I or II with preoperative hemoglobin levels of 10 mg/dL or higher. Surgical blood loss and hemodynamic parameters were documented. Results 76 patients were enrolled. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. The bleeding rate was 620 ± 190.0 mL for the normal saline group and 476 ± 177.98 mL in the dexmedetomidine group (P = 0.04). No significant effect on hemodynamic parameters was observed. Conclusion Based on the current study, intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during hip fracture surgery under general anesthesia reduced the amount of intraoperative bleeding without causing any significant hemodynamic disturbances. Registration number IRCT20191222045857N1 (Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials).
-
5.
To Investigate the Effect of Glucocorticoids on Blood Loss during and after First Total Hip Arthroplasty and Its Safety Meta-Analysis
Wang C, Li F, Liu W, Huang W, Li Q, Yin D
Journal of healthcare engineering. 2021;2021:9681129
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical glucocorticoids for total hip arthroplasty by meta-analysis. METHODS A computerized search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed English databases, as well as Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, vipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang database, and Chinese Knowledge Net Database, was performed to include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding topical glucocorticoid therapy for postoperative bleeding after THA according to the inclusion criteria. The quality evaluation criteria of RCTs, as stated in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5, were adopted for evaluation, and the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS A total of 10 articles were included, including 1,112 patients: 566 in the topical glucocorticoid group and 546 in the control group. The transfusion rate was 8.43% for topical glucocorticoids and 30.05% for the control group (P < 0.001), and topical glucocorticoids reduced 317.89 ml total blood loss and 76.82 ml invisible blood loss, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). The amount of intraoperative blood loss was reduced by topical glucocorticoids, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.83), and the postoperative HB value was increased by topical glucocorticoids, although the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The incidence of DVT and PE after topical glucocorticoid application (3.03%) was greater than that of the control group (2.40%), the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.54), and the incidence of infection after topical glucocorticoid application (3.03%) was greater than that of the control group (2.40%). The difference was not statistically significant (P=0.39). CONCLUSIONS Topical glucocorticoids can reduce the transfusion rate and blood loss in THA patients without increasing their risk of thrombosis.
-
6.
Effect of subarachnoid anesthesia combined with propofol target-controlled infusion on blood loss and transfusion for posterior total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients
Xu CS, Qu XD, Qu ZJ, Wang G, Wang HJ
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;(6):650-656
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravertebral and general anesthesia (GA) are two main anesthesia approaches but both have defects. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of subarachnoid anesthesia combined with propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) on blood loss and transfusion for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients in comparison with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) or GA. METHODS Totally, 240 patients (aged ≥65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] I-III) scheduled for posterior THA were enrolled from September 1st, 2017 to March 1st, 2018. All cases were randomly divided into three groups to receive CSEA (group C, n = 80), GA (group G, n = 80), or subarachnoid anesthesia and propofol TCI (group T, n = 80), respectively. Primary outcomes measured were intra-operative blood loss, autologous and allogeneic blood transfusion, mean arterial pressure at different time points, length of stay in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction degree. Furthermore, post-operative pain scores and complications were also observed. The difference of quantitative index between groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, repeated measurement generalized linear model, Student-Newman-Keuls test or rank-sum test, while ratio index was analyzed by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test. RESULTS Basic characteristics were comparable among the three groups. Intra-operative blood loss in group T (331.53 +/- 64.33 mL) and group G (308.03 +/- 64.90 mL) were significantly less than group C (455.40 +/- 120.48 mL, F = 65.80, P < 0.001). Similarly, the autologous transfusion of group T (130.99 +/- 30.36 mL) and group G (124.09 +/- 24.34 mL) were also markedly less than group C (178.31 +/- 48.68 mL, F = 52.99, P < 0.001). The allogenetic blood transfusion of group C (0 [0, 100.00]) was also significantly larger than group T (0) and group G (0) (Z = 2.47, P = 0.047). Except for the baseline, there were significant differences in mean arterial blood pressures before operation (F = 496.84, P < 0.001), 10-min after the beginning of operation (F = 351.43, P < 0.001), 30-min after the beginning of operation (F = 559.89, P < 0.001), 50-min after the beginning of operation (F = 374.74, P < 0.001), and at the end of operation (F = 26.14, P < 0.001) among the three groups. Length of stay in PACU of group T (9.41 +/- 1.19 min) was comparable with group C (8.83 +/- 1.26 min), and both were significantly shorter than group G (16.55 +/- 3.10 min, F = 352.50, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of length of hospitalization and post-operative visual analog scale scores. Patient satisfaction degree of group T (77/80) was significantly higher than group C (66/80, chi = 7.96, P = 0.004) and G (69/80, chi = 5.01, P = 0.025). One patient complained of post-dural puncture headache and two complained of low back pain in group C, while none in group T. Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting in group G (10/80) was significantly higher than group T (3/80, chi = 4.10, P = 0.043) and group C (2/80, chi = 5.76, P = 0.016). No deep vein thrombosis or delayed post-operative functional exercise was detected. CONCLUSIONS Single subarachnoid anesthesia combined with propofol TCI seems to perform better than CSEA and GA for posterior THA in elderly patients, with less blood loss and peri-operative transfusion, higher patient satisfaction degree and fewer complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR-IPR-17013461; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=23024.
-
7.
Use of ethamsylate to reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusion rate in total hip arthroplasty. controlled clinical trial
Ramos-Sanchez TA, Ramos-Morales T, Morales-Avalos R, Blazquez-Saldana J, Pena-Martinez VM, Vilchez-Cavazos F
Cirugia Y Cirujanos. 2018;86((3)):270-276.
Abstract
Antecedentes: El sangrado secundario es una de las principales causas de morbilidad despues de la cirugia. El etamsilato se ha utilizado con buenos resultados para disminuir el sangrado en diversas patologias, como metrorragias, sangrado intraventricular, prostatectomias, cirugias de catarata y amigdalectomias. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del etamsilato para disminuir el sangrado en la cirugia de reemplazo total de cadera. Metodo: La poblacion se dividio en dos grupos. En el grupo control se realizo la hemostasia de manera convencional; en el grupo experimental se administro etamsilato. Resultados: Se incluyeron 34 pacientes, de los cuales 17 fueron aleatorizados al grupo de etamsilato y 17 al grupo control. No hubo diferencias en las caracteristicas de la poblacion entre los dos grupos. Al comparar los valores de hemoglobina preoperatoria y a las 24, 48 y 72 horas posquirurgicas entre ambos grupos, no se encontraron diferencias estadisticamente significativas. Tampoco hubo diferencia en el hematocrito ni en la cuantificacion del gasto por drenaje a las 24 y 48 horas. Hubo tres pacientes transfundidos en el grupo de etamsilato y siete en el grupo de control, lo cual no difirio significativamente (p = 0.62). Conclusion: En este estudio no se demostro un efecto sobre la reduccion de la hemorragia en pacientes sometidos a reemplazo total de cadera con el uso de etamsilato. Background: Secondary bleeding is one of the leading causes of morbidity after the surgery. Ethamsylate has been used with good results to decrease bleeding in various pathologies such as metrorrhagia, intraventricular bleeding, prostatectomies, cataract surgeries and tonsillectomies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the hemostatic agent ethamsylate to decrease bleeding in total hip replacement surgery. Method: The population were divided into two groups, in the control group was performed the hemostasis conventionally; in the experimental group ethamsylate was administered. Results: A total of 34 patients were included, of whom 17 were randomized to the group of ethamsylate and 17 randomized to the control group. There were no differences in the characteristics of the population between the two groups. Comparing preoperative hemoglobin levels and at 24, 48 and 72 postsurgical hours between the control group and ethamsylate group there was no statistically significant difference. There was also no difference in the levels of hematocrit. In the quantification of expenditure by the drainage there was no difference between the groups at 24 and 48 hours. There were three patients transfused in the ethamsylate group and seven in the control group, which did not differ significantly (p = 0.62). Conclusion: An effect on the reduction of bleeding in patients undergoing total hip replacement with the use of hemostatic agent ethamsylate was not demonstrated in this study.
-
8.
Ten units intravenous oxytocin over 2-4 h is as effective as 30 units over 8-12 h in preventing postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
Cecilia M, Vijayaselvi R, Bansal R, Lakshmi L, Jose R
Indian journal of pharmacology. 2018;50(5):279-283
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Currently, recommended high-dose oxytocin regimen for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following cesarean delivery (CD) is associated with maternal side effects frequency of which is greater with a higher cumulative dose and rapid administration of oxytocin. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of single-dose intravenous oxytocin over 2-4 h (total = 10 units) with oxytocin maintenance infusion for 8-12 h (total = 30 units) in postoperative CD women for the prevention of PPH. METHODS The current double-blinded randomized controlled trial was carried out in a tertiary care institute in Southern India. The primary outcome measures included the following: (a) the need for additional uterotonics to control PPH and (b) significant deterioration of vital signs as assessed by pulse rate and blood pressure in the postoperative period. The secondary outcome measures were as follows: (a) significant difference (≥10% between preoperative and postoperative packed cell volume) and (b) need for blood transfusion. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Two hundred and seventy-one women were randomized into Group A (oxytocin = 10 units; n = 135) and Group B (oxytocin = 30 units; n = 136). Both the groups were comparable with regard to demographic characteristics. There was no difference in any of primary or secondary outcome measures in the two groups. Thus, low-dose oxytocin regimen is as effective as high-dose oxytocin regimen in the prevention of PPH in postoperative CD women.
-
9.
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in patients undergoing surgery with two hemodilution methods
Guo J, Yuan X, Zhou X, Jin X
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2017;38:75-80.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in patients undergoing surgery under acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) and acute hypervolemic hemodilution (AHH). METHODS Ninety patients with orthopedic surgery were divided into ANH, AHH and control groups, which received hemodilution by hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 transfusion, Voluven transfusion and regular transfusion and infusion during surgery, respectively. Each group was divided into 3 sub-groups, administrated with cisatracurium at dosage of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3mg/kg respectively. The changes in plasma protein, pH and electrolytes from the hemodilution beginning to surgery finish were monitored. Before and after cisatracurium administration, the phamocodynamic indicators of muscle relaxant were observed, and the plasma drug concentration was measured. RESULTS After hemodilution or regular transfusion, all three groups experienced a distinct drop in total plasma protein, albumin and pH. Compared with control group, the plasma concentrations of both K+ and Ca2+ in ANH and AHH groups significantly dropped (P<0.05), and those in each group after administration of cisatracurium also dropped, compared with before (P<0.05). After administration with cisatracurium, the onset time of muscle relaxation in AHH group was extended notably, compared with AHH and control groups (P<0.05), with no distinct difference of residual pharmacodynamics parameters (P>0.05). In the same hemodilution or regular infusion, with increase of drug dosage, the onset time of muscle relaxation was shortened, and the period of no response to train-of-four stimulation, muscle relaxation blockade duration and action time of muscle relaxation blockade in body were extended (P<0.05). CONCLUSION When using cisatracurium under AHH, the dosage should be increased appropriately, while it need not be adjusted under ANH.
-
10.
The efficacy and safety of epinephrine for postoperative bleeding in total joint arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
Teng Y, Ma J, Ma X, Wang Y, Lu B, Guo C
Medicine. 2017;96((17)):e6763.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) usually results in postoperative bleeding. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) have been performed to evaluate the effects of epinephrine on postoperative bleeding after TJA. However, this remained controversial about the efficacy and safety of epinephrine for postoperative bleeding in TJA. The objective of our meta-analysis was to compare the overall effect and safety of epinephrine and placebo for postoperative bleeding in TJA. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify potentially relevant articles. RCTs or non-RCTs involving epinephrine and placebo for blood loss in total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty were included. Our study was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RevMan v5.3 was used to analyze the relevant data. RESULTS Four RCTs and 1 non-RCT involving 646 participants met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled results from meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with control groups, epinephrine groups could significantly reduce the postoperative bleeding volume (mean difference [MD] = -168.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -272.37 to -64.47, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding volume between epinephrine and control groups (MD = -12.89, 95% CI: -53.45 to 27.69, P = 0.53). No significant difference was found between 2 groups in terms of postoperative hemoglobin loss (MD = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.66 to 0.10, P = 0.15). Compared with the control groups, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of postoperative transfusion rate in epinephrine groups (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64-1.15, P = 0.31). In addition, the results of the meta-analysis also indicated no significant difference in terms of the incidence rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) between 2 groups (RR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.05-1.64, P = 0.16). CONCLUSION The meta-analysis showed that epinephrine could significantly reduce postoperative bleeding volume in TJA without increasing the incidence of DVT. However, there was no significant reduction in intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hemoglobin loss, and transfusion rate after the administration of epinephrine. LIMITATIONS In this study, a higher heterogeneity and a risk of selection bias may be present in postoperative hemoglobin loss. In addition, the sample size of the included studies was too small, so our findings need to be further validated with more high-quality and larger scale RCTs in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER None.