1.
Root coverage with platelet-rich fibrin or connective tissue graft: a split-mouth randomized trial
Carrera, T. M. I., Machado, L. M., Soares, M. T. R., Passos, G. P., Oliveira, G. J. P., Ribeiro Júnior, N. V., Soares, P. B. F., Pigossi, S. C.
Brazilian oral research. 2023;37:e084
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the use of connective tissue grafts (CTG) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) associated with the tunnel technique (TT) for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions (GR). Fourteen patients with multiple bilateral GR [type 1 recession (RT 1)] in the maxillary incisors, canines, and/or premolars were included. The TT was performed on both sides (split-mouth model); CTG (36 GR) was used on one side, and on the other, PRF (36 GR) was used. Clinical parameters, including recession depth (RD), probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), and keratinized gingiva thickness/width (GT/KTW), were obtained at baseline and after 1, 3, 6, and 16 months. Lower RD (0.81 ± 0.68 vs. 1.23 ± 0.71 mm) and CAL (2.54 ± 0.63 vs. 2.73 ± 0.82 mm) were observed for CTG compared to PRF after 16 months. Higher GT was obtained for CTG compared to PRF after 3 (1.81 ± 0.56 vs 1.43 ± 0.47 mm) and 6 months (1.67 ± 0.61 vs. 1.38 ± 0.55 mm, p < 0.05). The recession coverage (RC) was higher for CTG (55.42% ± 37.14) in comparison to PRF (29.53% ± 34.08) after 16 months (p < 0.05). Similarly, CTG presented a more complete coverage of the recession (15; 41.66%) than PRF (9; 24.32%). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of surgery time, postoperative pain, or healing patterns. Greater esthetic satisfaction was obtained with CTG. It was concluded that CTG combined with TT showed clinical and esthetic results superior to those of PRF in multiple GR treatments.
2.
Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial
Elsheikh, H. A., Abdelsameaa, S. E., Elbahnasi, A. A., Abdel-Rahman, F. H.
BMC oral health. 2023;23(1):977
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different gap filling materials in immediate implant in anterior and premolar regions of maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-six implants were inserted in patients seeking for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant. Patients were randomly distributed into three equal groups, twelve implants in each group. Group 1 received Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) into the jumping distance, Group 2 received Xenograft into the jumping distance and Group 3 received Alloplastic bone grafting material into the jumping distance. Implant stability by measuring the changes in Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), peri-implant pocket depth, marginal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness were evaluated during follow up periods. All the clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis by One Way ANOVA test and the Post Hoc Tukey test. RESULTS This study involved 19 female patients and 17 male patients who received 36 dental implants. There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding implant stability, peri-implant pocket depth and palatal bone loss, while there was a significant difference between PRF Group (Group 1) and the other Groups regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness. CONCLUSION PRF can be used as a gap filling material in conjunction with immediate implant placement, but other bone grafting materials give superior result regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was listed on www. CLINICALTRIALS gov with registration number (NCT05878392) on 26/05/2023. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, approved the current study in compliance with the seventh revision of the Helsinki Declaration in 2013 (A0103023OS).
3.
Surgical treatment methods of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. A systematic review
Zigmantavi, čius, , J., Kilinskaitė, , G., Kubilius, , R.
Stomatologija. 2023;24(4):91-99
Abstract
Objective: Relevance of the problem and the aim: A variety of surgical treatment modalities are analyzed to treat medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, using different adjuvant therapies (fluorescence-guided surgery, autologous platelet concentrates) and thus to improve bone and mucosa healing in the postoperative period and reduce the risk of recurrence of osteonecrosis. The purpose of the present systematic review is to compare the effectiveness of different surgical treatments for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (with applications of autologous platelet concentrates, fluorescence guidance, or without adjuvant measures). Materials and methods: The protocol for the systematic review was prepared according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines for systematic reviews. Electronic databases used: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library. The review includes articles investigating surgical treatment methods for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Results: Twelve scientific articles were included in the review. The studies evaluated the efficacy of autologous platelet concentrates, fluorescence-guided surgery, or standard surgical treatment techniques without adjuvant therapies. The efficiency of curettage, sequestrectomy, and the use of autologous platelet concentrates have been found to range from 80% to 96.7%. The efficiency of fluorescence-guided surgery varied from 83.3% to 94.4%. The highest efficiency range of treatment results was determined by evaluating the surgical treatment without adjuvant therapies, which can reach from 22.22% to 93.2%. Conclusions: The best and most stable results in the surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw are achieved by the application of autologous platelet concentrates after surgical removal of necrotic bone or fluorescence-guided surgery.
4.
Effectiveness of the use of platelet-rich fibrin associated with open flap debridement compared to open flap debridement alone for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: Overview of systematic reviews
Padrón-Molina, O. J., Parise-Vasco, J. M., Zambrano-Achig, P. E., Montesinos-Guevara, C.
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2023;27(3):262-272
Abstract
In the recent years, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has gained importance in regenerative medicine due to its attributed tissue-inducing properties. However, it is still unclear whether there are benefits from using PRF with open flap debridement (OFD) for the treatment of intrabony defects compared to OFD alone. For this reason, in this study, we performed an overview of systematic reviews with Friendly Summaries of the Body of Evidence using Epistemonikos methodology on the use of PRF with OFD compared to OFD alone for the treatment of intrabony defects. We performed a systematic search in the Epistemonikos database. We extracted data from the included systematic reviews and reanalyzed the data of primary studies and generated a summary of the findings table. We used Review Manager (RevMan) v5.3 software and GRADEpro software for data analysis and data presentation. Eighteen systematic reviews were included after full-text screening, which had 16 clinical trials. Results were reported by the mean difference (MD); the following outcomes were analyzed: change in intrabony defect depth (MD: 1.37 mm more), change in radiographic bone defect filling (MD: 37.26% more), change in probing depth (MD: 1.22 mm more), change in clinical attachment level (MD: 1.32 mm more), and change in gingival margin level (MD: 0.31 more). We concluded that applying PRF with OFD to treat an intrabony defect has some clinical advantages compared to OFD alone.