-
1.
Transfusion Strategies for Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Duan ZX, Chen DX, Yang BZ, Zhang XQ
Pediatric cardiology. 2021
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the effects of restrictive and liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategies on pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery, including cyanotic and non-cyanotic children. A literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library database was conducted. Meta-analyses were carried out comparing restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the basis of cyanotic status. Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 497 children were included. There was no significant difference in the risk of in-hospital mortality between the two transfusion strategies (risk ratio 1.21; 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 2.99; P = 0.68). The trial sequential analysis suggested that the current meta-analysis had an absence of evidence for in-hospital mortality, and the data were insufficient. Moreover, no significant differences existed between groups in terms of risk of infection, blood loss, duration of mechanical ventilation, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay duration, or hospital stay duration. Cyanotic children treated with a liberal transfusion strategy had a shorter ventilator duration, but the transfusion strategy did not affect in-hospital mortality, infection, hospital stay, or PICU stay duration. On the basis of the available data, our analysis indicates that a liberal transfusion strategy did not lead to a better outcomes, but the data are extremely sparse, which highlights the need for clearer transfusion guidelines specific to this specific population.Trial registration number CRD42018102283.
-
2.
Cerebral Revascularization for Moyamoya syndrome associated with Sickle Cell Disease: A systematic review of literature on the role of EC-IC bypass in treating neurological manifestations of pediatric patients with Sickle Cell Disease
Terrell D, Savardekar AR, Whipple SG, Dossani RH, Spetzler RF, Sun H
World neurosurgery. 2020
Abstract
Moyamoya syndrome (MMS) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) accentuates the risk of recurrent strokes. Chronic transfusion therapy (CTT) is an excellent option for preventing recurrent strokes in most SCD patients. In SCD with MMS, CTT may fail as a long-term solution. Cerebral revascularization, in the form of EC-IC bypass, has been shown to prevent recurrent strokes in this cohort. We review the evolution of this paradigm shift in the management of SCD-associated MMS. A systematic review, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocol, was conducted. Our primary objectives were: 1.) to study the evolution of cerebral revascularization techniques in management of MMS in SCD; and 2.) to analyze the impact of neurosurgical intervention in this high-risk population. Four patients with SCD-associated MMS, who underwent indirect cerebral revascularization at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. A summary of 13 articles chronicling the advent and subsequent evolution of cerebral revascularization as a viable treatment strategy for stroke prevention in SCD-associated MMS, is presented. Literature review suggests early detection and surgical intervention (in addition to CTT) could significantly reduce stroke recurrence and improve neuro-cognitive outcome. Our short series of 4 patients also had a good outcome and no recurrence of strokes post-operatively. Current literature emphasizes the use of a traditional standardized protocol for early identification (TCDs, selective MRA, and CTT). Early treatment and screening that involves early MR angiography and referral to neurosurgery for revascularization may be considered for this high-risk population.
-
3.
The effect of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies on longer-term outcomes after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
Kashani HH, Lodewyks C, Kavosh MS, Jeyaraman MM, Neilson C, Okoli G, Rabbani R, Abou-Setta AM, Zarychanski R, Grocott HP
Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
PURPOSE Blood transfusions are frequently administered in cardiac surgery. Despite a large number of published studies comparing a "restrictive" strategy with a "liberal" strategy, no clear consensus has emerged to guide blood transfusion practice in cardiac surgery patients. The purpose of this study was to identify, critically appraise, and summarize the evidence on the overall effect of restrictive transfusion strategies compared with liberal transfusion strategies on mortality, other clinical outcomes, and transfusion-related outcomes in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. SOURCE We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP) and Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley) from inception to 1 December 2017 and queried clinical trial registries and conference proceedings for randomized-controlled trials of liberal vs restrictive transfusion strategies in cardiac surgery. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS From 7,908 citations, we included ten trials (9,101 patients) and eight companion publications. Overall, we found no significant difference in mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies (risk ratio [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.54; I(2) = 33%; seven trials; 8,661 patients). The use of a restrictive transfusion strategy did not appear to adversely impact any of the secondary clinical outcomes. As expected, the proportion of patients who received red blood cells (RBCs) in the restrictive group was significantly lower than in the liberal group (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.73; I(2) = 56%; 5 trials; 8,534 patients). Among transfused patients, a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with fewer transfused RBC units per patient than a liberal transfusion strategy. CONCLUSIONS In adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a restrictive transfusion strategy reduces RBC transfusion without impacting mortality rate or the incidence of other perioperative complications. Nevertheless, further large trials in subgroups of patients, potentially of differing age, are needed to establish firm evidence to guide transfusion in cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42017071440); registered 20 April, 2018.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery (10 studies, n= 9101).
Intervention
Restrictive transfusion strategies.
Comparison
Liberal transfusion strategies.
Outcome
No significant difference was found in mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies (risk ratio [RR], 1.08; I2 (2) = 33%. The proportion of patients who received red blood cells (RBCs) in the restrictive group was significantly lower than in the liberal group (RR, 0.68; I2 (2) = 56%. Among transfused patients, a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with fewer transfused RBC units per patient than a liberal transfusion strategy.
-
4.
Association Between Adverse Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Perioperative Blood Transfusions
Mirzaei S, Hershberger PE, DeVon HA
Critical care nurse. 2019;39(1):26-35
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bleeding is a serious complication of coronary artery bypass grafting that often leads to blood transfusion. Approximately 50% of patients who have the surgery receive blood products, and blood transfusions play a role in adverse outcomes after the surgery. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between perioperative blood transfusion and postoperative adverse outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS A systematic review of the literature, via the matrix method of quality evaluation, was conducted. PubMed, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases for 2000 through 2016 were searched. Inclusion criteria were articles published in English and original research related to clinical outcomes of blood transfusion after coronary artery bypass grafting. Seventeen articles were included in the review. RESULTS Mortality, both short- and long-term, was significantly higher in transfusion patients than in nontransfusion patients. Patients with transfusion of red blood cells had higher resource utilization and more complications, including infection, pneumonia, renal failure, graft occlusion, and atrial fibrillation, than did nontransfusion patients. CONCLUSION An association exists between red blood cell transfusions and adverse clinical outcomes for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Transfusion of red blood cells is sometimes unnecessary, may be injurious, and should be used cautiously. Even a single-unit increase in perioperative red blood cell transfusions can have a significant adverse impact on outcomes. Individual benefits and risks should be weighed before transfusion to avoid adverse outcomes. Transfusion guidelines should be reviewed to include the latest evidence to guarantee the most appropriate use of blood products.
-
5.
Red blood cell transfusion threshold after pediatric cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Deng X, Wang Y, Huang P, Luo J, Xiao Y, Qiu J, Yang G
Medicine. 2019;98(11):e14884
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy is implemented to minimize risk following allogeneic blood transfusion in adult cardiac surgery. However, it is still unclear if it can be applied to pediatric cardiac patients. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of postoperative restrictive transfusion thresholds on clinical outcomes based on up-to-date results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in pediatric cardiac surgery. METHOD We searched for RCTs and observational studies in the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to October 26, 2017. We also searched reference lists of published guidelines, reviews, and relevant articles, as well as conference proceedings. No language restrictions were applied and no observational study met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS Four RCTs on cardiac surgery involving 454 patients were included. There were no differences in the pooled fixed effects of intensive care unit (ICU) stay between the liberal and restrictive transfusion thresholds (standardized mean difference SMD, 0.007; 95% confidence interval CI, -0.18-0.19; P = .94). There were also no differences in the length of hospital stay (SMD, -0.062; 95% CI, -0.28-0.15; P = .57), ventilation duration (SMD, -0.015; 95% CI, -0.25-0.22; P = .90), mean arterial lactate level (SMD, 0.071; 95% CI, -0.22-0.36; P = .63), and mortality (risk ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.13-1.94; P = .31). There was no inter-trial heterogeneity for any pooled analysis. Publication bias was tested using Egger, Begg, or the trim-and-fill test, and the results indicated no significant publication bias. CONCLUSION Evidence from RCTs in pediatric cardiac surgery, though limited, showed non-inferiority of restrictive thresholds over liberal thresholds in length of ICU stay and other outcomes following red blood cell transfusion. Further high-quality RCTs are necessary to confirm the findings.
-
6.
Thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastometry for bleeding management in adults undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Li C, Zhao Q, Yang K, Jiang L, Yu J
Journal of thoracic disease. 2019;11(4):1170-1181
Abstract
Background: Severe bleeding and massive transfusion of blood products may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality of cardiac surgery. A transfusion algorithm incorporating thromboelastography (TEG) or rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) can help to determine the appropriate time and target for the use of hemostatic blood products, which may thus reduce the quantity of blood loss as well as blood products transfused. Methods: We conducted meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to evaluate the effects of TEG or ROTEM-guided transfusion algorithms vs. standard treatments for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiac pulmonary bypass. Results: Nineteen studies with a total of 15,320 participants, including 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were included. All-cause mortality was not reduced either in overall studies or in RCTs. Blood loss volume was reduced by 132 mL in overall studies [mean difference (MD): -132.46, 95% CI: -207.49, -57.43; I(2) =53%, P<0.01], and by 103 mL in RCTs (MD: -103.50, 95% CI: -156.52, -50.48; I(2) =0%, P<0.01). The relative risks (RRs) in RCTs were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.98; I(2) =0%, P=0.02) for red blood cells transfusion, 0.59 (95% CI: 0.42-0.82; I(2) =55%, P<0.01) for fresh frozen plasma transfusion, and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.90; I(2) =0%, P<0.01) for platelet transfusion, respectively. Trial sequential analysis of continuous data on blood loss and dichotomous outcomes on transfusion of blood products suggested the benefits of a TEG/ROTEM-guided algorithm. Conclusions: TEG or ROTEM-guided transfusion strategies may reduce blood loss volume and the transfusion rates in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
-
7.
Restrictive compared with liberal red cell transfusion strategies in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis
Shehata N, Mistry N, da Costa BR, Pereira TV, Whitlock R, Curley GF, Scott DA, Hare GMT, Juni P, Mazer CD
European Heart Journal. 2018
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Aims: To determine whether a restrictive strategy of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion at lower haemoglobin concentrations is inferior to a liberal strategy of RBC transfusion at higher haemoglobin concentrations in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods and results: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials of the effect of restrictive and liberal RBC transfusion strategies on mortality within 30 days of surgery as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were those potentially resulting from anaemia-induced tissue hypoxia and transfusion outcomes. We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library until 17 November 2017. Thirteen trials were included. The risk ratio (RR) of mortality derived from 4545 patients assigned to a restrictive strategy when compared with 4547 transfused according to a liberal strategy was 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.21, I2 = 0]. A restrictive strategy did not have a statistically significant effect on the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26; I2=0), stroke (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-1.27, I2 = 0), renal failure (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76-1.20, I2 = 0), or infection (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.29, I2 = 0). Subgroup analysis of adult and paediatric trials did not show a significant interaction. At approximately 70% of the critical information size, the meta-analysis of mortality crossed the futility boundary for inferiority of the restrictive strategy. Conclusion: The current evidence does not support the notion that restrictive RBC transfusion strategies are inferior to liberal RBC strategies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
-
8.
Blood transfusion and risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A meta-analysis of cohort studies
Liu S, Li Z, Liu Z, Hu Z, Zheng G
Medicine. 2018;97((10))
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effect of blood transfusion (BT) on postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) in adult patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 2017 were searched. Cohort studies were searched that evaluated the association between BT and the risk of postoperative AF in adult patients who had undergone CABG surgery. Study quality was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). A meta-analysis was performed with the random-effect model.Eight cohort studies involving 7401 AF cases and 31,069 participants were identified and included in our data analysis. The pooled odds ratio of postoperative AF in patients with BT was 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.67), with significant heterogeneity (P < .0001, I = 79%). Excluding one study that had an off-pump CABG did not significantly impact this result (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.50; n = 7). To examine the stability of the primary results, we performed subgroup analyses. The association between BT and the risk of postoperative AF was similar, as determined in the stratified analyses conducted according to study design, type of surgery, and country.The findings of the present meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in postoperative AF risk among adult patients with BT. Further prospective large-scale studies are needed to establish causality and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
-
9.
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion for cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Kheiri B, Abdalla A, Osman M, Haykal T, Chintalapati S, Cranford J, Sotzen J, Gwinn M, Ahmed S, Hassan M, et al
Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis. 2018
Abstract
Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are among the most common recipients of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. However, whether restrictive RBC transfusion strategies for cardiac surgery achieve a similar clinical outcome in comparison with liberal strategies remains unclear. We searched electronic databases from inception to December 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and weighted-mean difference (MD) using a random-effects model. We included 9 RCTs with a total of 9005 patients. There was no significant difference in mortality between groups [RR 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.45; P = 0.86]. In addition, there were no significant differences between groups in the clinical outcomes of infections (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.94-1.26; P = 0.26), stroke (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.72-1.35; P = 0.91), respiratory morbidity (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.89-1.24; P = 0.58), renal morbidity (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94-1.09; P = 0.68), myocardial infarction (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.80-1.24; P = 0.99), cardiac arrhythmia (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.88-1.26; P = 0.56), gastrointestinal morbidity (RR 1.93; 95% CI 0.81-4.63; P = 0.14), or reoperation (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.67-1.20; P = 0.46). There was a significant difference in the intensive care unit length of stay (h) (MD 4.29; 95% CI 2.19-6.39, P < 0.01) favoring the liberal group. However, there was no significant difference in the hospital length of stay (days) (MD 0.15; 95% CI - 0.18 to 0.48; P = 0.38). In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed that restrictive strategies for RBC transfusion are as safe as liberal strategies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with regards to short-term clinical outcomes.
-
10.
Do selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increase the risk of bleeding or mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery? A meta-analysis of observational studies
Eckersley M J, Sepehripour A H, Casula R, Punjabi P, Athanasiou T
Perfusion. 2018;33((6):):415-422
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Depressive illness has a high prevalence in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The first line treatment for depression are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) which inhibit serotonin reuptake in the presynaptic neuronal membrane and uptake by platelets, inhibiting subsequent serotonin-mediated platelet activation. This presents a theoretically increased risk of bleeding and subsequent postoperative mortality. This review aims to investigate the effects of SSRIs on postoperative bleeding, defined as the need for transfusions and re-operation for bleeding, as well as 30-day mortality in patients undergoing CABG. METHOD Four hundred and thirty-seven papers were screened with seven meeting the full inclusion criteria. RESULTS Meta-analysis demonstrated that SSRI use increased the risk of red blood cell transfusion (odds ratio (OR) = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.26), but resulted in no difference in the rate of re-operation for bleeding (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.66-1.74). SSRI use had no effect on the rates of platelet (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79-1.09) or fresh frozen plasma (OR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.74-1.24) transfusion nor on the mortality rate (OR =1.03; 95 CI: 0.90-1.17). CONCLUSION This review demonstrates that SSRIs are largely safe in cardiac surgery as no increase in mortality was observed. However, there is a significantly raised chance of red blood cell transfusion. The heterogeneous nature of the current evidence base highlights the need for further research into SSRIs and whether any effect on patient outcomes in cardiac surgery occurs.
