Editor's Choice
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jan 1;38(1):18-24 doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002696.
POPULATION:
Musculoskeletal trauma patients with planned surgery (n= 99). INTERVENTION:Liberal transfusion threshold of 7.0 g/dL (n= 49). COMPARISON:Conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL (n= 50). OUTCOME:Overall, 46/49 (93.9%) of the liberal group had a transfusion versus 23/50 (46.0%) of the conservative group had a transfusion after resuscitation and after enrollment in this study. Following resuscitation and enrollment in the study, patients in the liberal group received a median of 1 unit of blood transfused (range 0–12) and patients in the conservative group received a median of 0 units of blood (range 0–14). Sixty-five patients completed 1- year follow-up. There was a significant association between a liberal transfusion strategy and higher rate of infection, with no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year.
OBJECTIVES:
To determine whether it is safe to use a conservative packed red blood cell transfusion hemoglobin (Hgb) threshold (5.5 g/dL) compared with a liberal transfusion threshold (7.0 g/dL) for asymptomatic musculoskeletal injured trauma patients who are no longer in the initial resuscitative period. METHODS:Design: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. SETTING:Three level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA:Patients aged 18-50 with an associated musculoskeletal injury with Hgb less than 9 g/dL or expected drop below 9 g/dL with planned surgery who were stable and no longer being actively resuscitated were randomized once their Hgb dropped below 7 g/dL to a conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL versus a liberal threshold of 7.0 g/dL. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS:Postoperative infection, other post-operative complications and Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment scores obtained at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year were compared for liberal and conservative transfusion thresholds. RESULTS:Sixty-five patients completed 1 year follow-up. There was a significant association between a liberal transfusion strategy and higher rate of infection (P = 0.01), with no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. This study was adequately powered at 92% to detect a difference in superficial infection (7% for liberal group, 0% for conservative, P < 0.01) but underpowered to detect a difference for deep infection (14% for liberal group, 6% for conservative group, P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS:A conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL in an asymptomatic young trauma patient with associated musculoskeletal injuries leads to a lower infection rate without an increase in adverse outcomes and no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
|
|
Editor's Choice
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2023 Oct 14; doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2023.07.013.
POPULATION:
Rh(D) alloimmunised pregnant women (15 studies). INTERVENTION:Systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness and safety of intrauterine transfusions (IUTs). COMPARISON: OUTCOME:The forest plots all showed statistically significant outcomes with heterogeneity of data. Results indicated a greater foetal survival rate with IUT to treat anaemic foetuses, a low foetal mortality rate, and low risk of procedure-related complications associated with foetal loss but a higher risk of foetal mortality when hydrops is present.
BACKGROUND:
Foetal anaemia is caused by a severe pregnancy complication, haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) are performed to treat foetal anaemia in alloimmunised pregnant women. If left untreated hydrops can develop thereby reducing the chance of survival. Survival rates have improved but the procedure is not without complications. Procedure-related complications can be associated with early gestational age, hence delaying IUT could improve outcomes. This review aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of IUTs by examining survival and mortality rates, procedure-related complications with associated foetal mortality and the influence of hydrops. STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD:A systematic review was conducted by searching keywords in four scientific databases from January 2000 to April 2022. A meta-analysis was performed with the OpenMeta-Analyst software using an arcsine transformed proportion with the binary random-effects model and maximum likelihood method. RESULTS:Fifteen studies were identified as eligible and used in the meta-analysis. The forest plots all showed statistically significant outcomes with heterogeneity of data. Results indicated a greater foetal survival rate with IUT to treat anaemic foetuses, a low foetal mortality rate, and low risk of procedure-related complications associated with foetal loss but a higher risk of foetal mortality when hydrops is present. CONCLUSION:The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that IUT is a safe and effective treatment for foetal anaemia in the absence of hydrops when experienced personnel perform the procedure to minimise the risk of procedure-related complications. |
|
|
Editor's Choice
Crit Care. 2023 Sep 12;27(1):354 doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04640-1.
POPULATION:
Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery such as coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery (86 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) n= 25,855). INTERVENTION:Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the incidence of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI): Goal directed perfusion (GDP), pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MECC), epidural analgesia, remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPc), tight glycemic control, kidney disease improving global outcomes care bundle, hyperoxia during CPB, restrictive transfusion strategy, high target arterial pressure. COMPARISON:Usual care. OUTCOME:No intervention had high-quality evidence to reduce CSA-AKI. From the included studies, the most frequent intervention was RIPc (31 RCTs, n= 7,738), MECC, (14 RCTs, n= 1,617) and pulsatile blood flow during CPB (10 RCTs, n= 1,993). Three interventions were associated with a significantly reduced risk of CSA-AKI: GDP, RIPc and pulsatile flow during CPB.
BACKGROUND:
Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is frequent. While two network meta-analyses assessed the impact of pharmacological interventions to prevent CSA-AKI, none focused on non-pharmacological interventions. We aim to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the incidence of CSA-AKI. METHODS:We searched PubMed, Embase, Central and clinical trial registries from January 1, 2004 (first consensus definition of AKI) to July 1, 2023. Additionally, we conducted manual screening of abstracts of major anesthesia and intensive care conferences over the last 5 years and reference lists of relevant studies. We selected all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing a non-pharmacological intervention to reduce the incidence of CSA-AKI, without language restriction. We excluded RCTs of heart transplantation or involving a pediatric population. The primary outcome variable was CSA-AKI. Two reviewers independently identified trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS:We included 86 trials (25,855 patients) evaluating 10 non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the incidence of CSA-AKI. No intervention had high-quality evidence to reduce CSA-AKI. Two interventions were associated with a significant reduction in CSA-AKI incidence, with moderate quality of evidence: goal-directed perfusion (RR, 0.55 [95% CI 0.40-0.76], I2 = 0%; Phet = 0.44) and remote ischemic preconditioning (RR, 0.86 [0.78-0.95]; I2 = 23%; Phet = 0.07). Pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass was associated with a significant reduction in CSA-AKI incidence but with very low quality of evidence (RR = 0.69 [0.48; 0.99]; I2 = 53%; Phet < 0.01). We found high quality of evidence for lack of effect of restrictive transfusion strategy (RR, 1.02 [95% CI 0.92; 1.12; Phet = 0.67; I2 = 3%) and tight glycemic control (RR, 0.86 [95% CI 0.55; 1.35]; Phet = 0.25; I2 = 26%). CONCLUSIONS:Two non-pharmacological interventions are likely to reduce CSA-AKI incidence, with moderate quality of evidence: goal-directed perfusion and remote ischemic preconditioning. |