0
selected
-
1.
Targeted Bleeding Management Guided by Non-Invasive Haemoglobin Measurement in Surgical Patients
Akdag S, Zengin SU, Cakmak G, Umuroglu T, Aykac ZZ, Saracoglu A
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP. 2022;32(10):1242-1248
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess blood transfusion decisions in blood losses using a continuous total haemoglobin (SpHb) and non-invasive haemoglobin (Hb) device. STUDY DESIGN Double-blinded randomised controlled trial. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, from March 2018 to December 2019. METHODOLOGY One hundred and twenty adult patients scheduled for elective major surgery and expected to experience a blood loss greater than 20% of their total blood volume were divided into two groups. These groups were compared for bleeding management with conventional blood gas sampling (Group Hb, the control group) according to Hb monitoring versus SpHb measurement (Group SpHb, the study group). RESULTS In the postoperative measurement, there were fewer red blood cells (RBC) in the SpHb group than in the Hb group (p=0.020). There was a greater change in the amount of RBC from the perioperative to the postoperative period in the SpHb group compared to the Hb group (p<0.001). Postoperative Hb levels of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) were higher in the SpHb group than in the Hb group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION SpHb can provide effective patient blood management in cases of major surgery. It does not cause a delay in the decision of blood transfusion during surgery. KEY WORDS Haemorrhage, Anaemia, Blood transfusion, General surgery.
-
2.
A predictive model for blood transfusion during liver resection
Cao B, Hao P, Guo W, Ye X, Li Q, Su X, Li L, Zeng J
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND A predictive model that can identify patients who are at increased risk of intraoperative blood transfusion could guide preoperative transfusion risk counseling, optimize health care resources, and reduce medical costs. Although previous studies have identified some predictors for particular populations, there is currently no existing model that uses preoperative variables to accurately predict blood transfusion during surgery, which could help anesthesiologists optimize intraoperative anesthetic management. METHODS We collected data from 582 patients who underwent elective liver resection at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. The data set was then randomly divided into a training set (n = 410) and a validation set (n = 172) at a 7:3 ratio. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operating regression model was used to select the optimal feature, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to construct the transfusion risk model. The concordance index (C-index) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the discrimination ability, and the calibration ability was assessed with calibration curves. In addition, we used decision curve analysis (DCA) to estimate the clinical application value. For external validation, the test set data were employed. RESULTS The final model had 8 predictor variables for intraoperative blood transfusion, which included the following: preoperative hemoglobin level, preoperative prothrombin time >14 s, preoperative total bilirubin >21 μmol/L, respiratory diseases, cirrhosis, maximum lesion diameter >5 cm, macrovascular invasion, and previous abdominal surgery. The model showed a C-index of 0.834 (95% confidence interval, 0.789-0.879) for the training set and 0.831 (95% confidence interval, 0.766-0.896) for the validation set. The AUCs were 0.834 and 0.831 for the training and validation sets, respectively. The calibration curve showed that our model had good consistency between the predictions and observations. The DCA demonstrated that the transfusion nomogram was reliable for clinical applications when an intervention was decided at the possible threshold across 1%-99% for the training set. CONCLUSION We developed a predictive model with excellent accuracy and discrimination ability that can help identify those patients at higher odds of intraoperative blood transfusion. This tool may help guide preoperative counseling regarding transfusion risk, optimize health care resources, reduce medical costs, and optimize anesthetic management during surgery.
-
3.
Clinical usefulness of Red Dichromatic Imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: first report from a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial
Fujimoto A, Saito Y, Abe S, Hoteya S, Nomura K, Yasuda H, Matsuo Y, Uraoka T, Kuribayashi S, Tsuji Y, et al
Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. 2021
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To verify the efficacy and safety of Red Dichromatic Imaging (RDI) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent ESD of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum. Patients who received hemostatic treatments by RDI during ESD were defined as the RDI group (n=204), and those who received hemostatic treatments by white light imaging (WLI) were defined as the WLI group (n=200). The primary endpoint was a shortening of the hemostasis time. The secondary endpoints were a reduction of the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during the hemostatic treatment, a shortened treatment time, and a non-inferior perforation rate, in RDI versus WLI. RESULTS The mean hemostasis time in RDI (n=860) was not significantly shorter than that in WLI (n=1049) (62.3±108.1 versus 56.2±74.6 seconds; p=0.921). The median hemostasis time was significantly longer in RDI than in WLI (36.0 (18.0-71.0) versus 28.0 (14.0-66.0) seconds; p=0.001) in a sensitivity analysis. The psychological stress was significantly lower in RDI than in WLI (1.71±0.935 versus 2.03±1.038; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the ESD treatment time between RDI (n=161) and WLI (n=168) (58.0 (35.0-86.0) versus 60.0 (38.0-88.5) minutes; p=0.855). Four perforations were observed, but none of them took place during the hemostatic treatment. CONCLUSIONS Hemostatic treatment using RDI does not shorten the hemostasis time. RDI, however, is safe to use for hemostatic procedures and reduces the psychological stress experienced by endoscopists when they perform hemostatic treatment during ESD. UMIN000025134.
-
4.
Techniques for blood loss estimation in major non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tran A, Heuser J, Ramsay T, McIsaac DM, Martel G
Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
PURPOSE Estimated blood loss (EBL) is an important tool in clinical decision-making and surgical outcomes research. It guides perioperative transfusion practice and serves as a key predictor of short-term perioperative risks and long-term oncologic outcomes. Despite its widespread clinical and research use, there is no gold standard for blood loss estimation. We sought to systematically review and compare techniques for intraoperative blood loss estimation in major non-cardiac surgery with the objective of informing clinical estimation and research standards. SOURCE A structured search strategy was applied to Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 2020, to identify studies comparing methods of intraoperative blood loss in adult patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. We summarized agreement between groups of pairwise comparisons as visual estimation vs formula estimation, visual estimation vs other, and formula estimation vs other. For each of these comparisons, we described tendencies for higher or lower EBL values, consistency of findings, pooled mean differences, standard deviations, and confidence intervals. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS We included 26 studies involving 3,297 patients in this review. We found that visual estimation is the most frequently studied technique. In addition, visual techniques tended to provide lower EBL values than formula-based estimation or other techniques, though this effect was not statistically significant in pooled analyses likely due to sample size limitations. When accounting for the contextual mean blood loss, similar case-to-case variation exists for all estimation techniques. CONCLUSIONS We found that significant case-by-case variation exists for all methods of blood loss evaluation and that there is significant disagreement between techniques. Given the importance placed on EBL, particularly for perioperative prognostication models, clinicians should consider the universal adoption of a practical and reproducible method for blood loss evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42015029439); registered: 18 November 2015.PROSPERO (CRD42015029439); registered: 18 November 2015.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery (26 studies, n= 3,297).
Intervention
Visual estimation of blood loss.
Comparison
Formula estimation of blood loss, and other tecnniques for estimating blood loss.
Outcome
Visual estimation was the most frequently studied technique. Visual techniques tended to provide lower estimated blood loss values than formula-based estimation or other techniques, though this effect was not statistically significant in pooled analyses. When accounting for the contextual mean blood loss, similar case-to-case variation existed for all estimation techniques.
-
5.
Comparison of visually estimated blood loss with direct hemoglobin measurement in multilevel spine surgery
Guinn, N. R., Broomer, B. W., White, W., Richardson, W., Hill, S. E.
Transfusion. 2013;53(11):2790-4
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estimates of blood loss in the operating room are typically performed as a visual assessment by providers, despite multiple studies showing this to be inaccurate. Use of a less subjective measurement of blood loss such as direct measurement of the hemoglobin (Hb) mass lost from the surgical field may better quantify surgical bleeding. The objective of this investigation was to compare anesthesiologist estimates of intraoperative blood loss with measured Hb loss. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Sixty patients undergoing posterior spine surgery were enrolled in a prospective, randomized trial comparing intraoperative blood loss using unipolar cautery alone or with use of a bipolar tissue sealant device. Hb concentration and fluid volume were measured from all surgical sponges, suction canisters, and the cell salvage device. Using the volume and concentration of Hb from each solution allowed calculation of Hb mass, which was converted into volume of blood lost and compared with estimates of blood loss documented by the anesthesia team. A single-sample t test of no difference was used to compare estimated with measured blood loss. RESULTS Mean estimated blood loss exceeded measured blood loss by 246 mL (860 mL vs. 614 mL, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Estimated blood loss exceeded measured blood loss by 40% on average. The likely etiology of this discrepancy relates to the inability to visually determine Hb concentration of sanguineous solutions in suction canisters and surgical sponges. Ramifications of excessive bleeding estimates include unnecessary transfusion and overadministration of intravenous fluids, both of which may have deleterious effects.
-
6.
Calculation of the allowable blood loss before transfusion with a programmable pocket calculator . German
Lorentz A, Gasteiger P, Osswald PM
Der Anaesthesist. 1987;36((6):):306-12.
Abstract
Introduction. The amount of blood loss during surgery that requires transfusion is frequently estimated with a linear formula (1) using blood volume--calculated on a volume per weight basis--, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, and an established minimum hemoglobin concentration. This formula, however, underestimates allowable pretransfusion blood loss, because it implies that all blood lost contains the initial hemoglobin concentration. In addition, hemodilution by infusion therapy prior to surgery is usually not taken into consideration. Methods. In order to estimate allowable pretransfusion blood loss more accurately and conveniently, a program was developed for a programmable pocket computer. This program calculates (number of equation in parenthesis): blood volume (2a, 2b) expansion of blood volume prior to surgery (3) hemodilution prior to surgery (4) allowable blood loss during isovolemic hemodilution (5). The applicability of the program to the situation during orthopedic operations was tested in a study in which allowable pretransfusion blood loss was estimated for one group of patients and was calculated with the computer program for another group of patients. Eighty patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery were studied. After preoperative evaluation the attending anesthetist established a minimum hemoglobin concentration and the type of cardiocirculatory monitoring to be used. Patients were divided at random into two groups: for one group blood volume was estimated on a volume per weight basis and allowable blood loss was calculated using equation (1); for the second group allowable blood loss was calculated with the computer program. During the evaluation of the data the computer calculations were also carrier out for group 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)