-
1.
A predictive model for blood transfusion during liver resection
Cao B, Hao P, Guo W, Ye X, Li Q, Su X, Li L, Zeng J
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND A predictive model that can identify patients who are at increased risk of intraoperative blood transfusion could guide preoperative transfusion risk counseling, optimize health care resources, and reduce medical costs. Although previous studies have identified some predictors for particular populations, there is currently no existing model that uses preoperative variables to accurately predict blood transfusion during surgery, which could help anesthesiologists optimize intraoperative anesthetic management. METHODS We collected data from 582 patients who underwent elective liver resection at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. The data set was then randomly divided into a training set (n = 410) and a validation set (n = 172) at a 7:3 ratio. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operating regression model was used to select the optimal feature, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to construct the transfusion risk model. The concordance index (C-index) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the discrimination ability, and the calibration ability was assessed with calibration curves. In addition, we used decision curve analysis (DCA) to estimate the clinical application value. For external validation, the test set data were employed. RESULTS The final model had 8 predictor variables for intraoperative blood transfusion, which included the following: preoperative hemoglobin level, preoperative prothrombin time >14 s, preoperative total bilirubin >21 μmol/L, respiratory diseases, cirrhosis, maximum lesion diameter >5 cm, macrovascular invasion, and previous abdominal surgery. The model showed a C-index of 0.834 (95% confidence interval, 0.789-0.879) for the training set and 0.831 (95% confidence interval, 0.766-0.896) for the validation set. The AUCs were 0.834 and 0.831 for the training and validation sets, respectively. The calibration curve showed that our model had good consistency between the predictions and observations. The DCA demonstrated that the transfusion nomogram was reliable for clinical applications when an intervention was decided at the possible threshold across 1%-99% for the training set. CONCLUSION We developed a predictive model with excellent accuracy and discrimination ability that can help identify those patients at higher odds of intraoperative blood transfusion. This tool may help guide preoperative counseling regarding transfusion risk, optimize health care resources, reduce medical costs, and optimize anesthetic management during surgery.
-
2.
A randomized controlled pilot trial of video-modelling versus telementoring for improved hemorrhage control wound packing
Kirkpatrick AW, McKee JL, Tomlinson C, Donley N, Ball CG, Wachs J
American journal of surgery. 2022
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Exsanguination is the most preventable cause of death. Paradigms such as STOP THE BLEED recognize increased responsibility among the less experienced with Wound Packing (WP) being a critical skill. As even trained providers may perform poorly, we compared Video-modelling (VM), a form of behavioural modelling involving video demonstration prior to intervention against remote telementoring (RTM) involving remote real-time expert-guidance. METHODS Search and Rescue (SAR-Techs), trained in WP were asked to pack a wound on a standardized simulator randomized to RMT, VM, or control. RESULTS 24 SAR-Techs (median age 37, median 16.5 years experience) participated. Controls were consistently faster than RTM (p = 0.005) and VM (p = 0.000), with no difference between RTM and VM. However, 50% (n = 4) Controls failed to pack properly, compared to 100% success in both VM and RTM, despite all SAR-Techs feeling the task was "easy". DISCUSSION Performance of a life-saving technique was improved through either VM or RTM, suggesting that both techniques are beneficial and complementary to each other. Further work should be extended to law enforcement/lay public to examine logistical challenges.
-
3.
Targeted Bleeding Management Guided by Non-Invasive Haemoglobin Measurement in Surgical Patients
Akdag S, Zengin SU, Cakmak G, Umuroglu T, Aykac ZZ, Saracoglu A
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP. 2022;32(10):1242-1248
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess blood transfusion decisions in blood losses using a continuous total haemoglobin (SpHb) and non-invasive haemoglobin (Hb) device. STUDY DESIGN Double-blinded randomised controlled trial. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, from March 2018 to December 2019. METHODOLOGY One hundred and twenty adult patients scheduled for elective major surgery and expected to experience a blood loss greater than 20% of their total blood volume were divided into two groups. These groups were compared for bleeding management with conventional blood gas sampling (Group Hb, the control group) according to Hb monitoring versus SpHb measurement (Group SpHb, the study group). RESULTS In the postoperative measurement, there were fewer red blood cells (RBC) in the SpHb group than in the Hb group (p=0.020). There was a greater change in the amount of RBC from the perioperative to the postoperative period in the SpHb group compared to the Hb group (p<0.001). Postoperative Hb levels of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) were higher in the SpHb group than in the Hb group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION SpHb can provide effective patient blood management in cases of major surgery. It does not cause a delay in the decision of blood transfusion during surgery. KEY WORDS Haemorrhage, Anaemia, Blood transfusion, General surgery.
-
4.
The Recognition of Excessive blood loss At ChildbirTh (REACT) Study: A two-phase exploratory, sequential mixed methods inquiry using focus groups, interviews, and a pilot, randomised crossover study
Hancock A, Weeks AD, Furber C, Campbell M, Lavender T
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2021
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore how childbirth-related blood loss is evaluated and excessive bleeding recognised; and develop and test a theory of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) diagnosis. DESIGN Two-phase, exploratory, sequential mixed methods design using focus groups, interviews and a pilot, randomised crossover study. SETTING Two hospitals in North West England. SAMPLE Women (following vaginal birth with and without PPH), birth partners, midwives and obstetricians. METHODS Phase 1 (qualitative): 8 focus groups and 20 one-to-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 women, 5 birth partners, 11 obstetricians, 1 obstetric anaesthetist and 19 midwives (n=51). Phase 2 (quantitative): 11 obstetricians and 10 midwives (n=21) completed two simulations of fast and slow blood loss using a high-fidelity childbirth simulator. RESULTS Responses to blood loss were described as automatic, intuitive reactions to the speed, nature and visibility of blood flow. Health professionals reported that quantifying volume was most useful after a PPH diagnosis, to validate intuitive decisions and guide on-going management. During simulations, PPH treatment was initiated at volumes at or below 200ml (fast mean blood loss 79.6ml, SD 41.1; slow mean blood loss 62.6ml, SD 27.7). All participants treated fast, visible blood loss, but only half treated slow blood loss, despite there being no difference in volumes (difference 18.2ml, 95% CI -5.6 to 42.2ml, p=0.124). CONCLUSIONS Experience and intuition, rather than blood loss volume, inform recognition of excessive blood loss after birth. Women and birth partners want more information and open communication about blood loss. Further research exploring clinical decision-making and how to support it is required.
PICO Summary
Population
Women following vaginal birth, birth partners, midwives and obstetricians in two centres in the UK (n= 51).
Intervention
Simulation of ‘slow blood loss followed by fast blood loss’ (n= 10).
Comparison
Simulation of ‘fast blood loss followed by slow blood loss’ (n= 11).
Outcome
This mixed methods study had a qualitative phase involving focus groups and interviews, and a quantitative phase consisting in a randomised crossover study. Responses to blood loss were described as automatic, intuitive reactions to the speed, nature and visibility of blood flow. Health professionals reported that quantifying volume was most useful after a postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) diagnosis, to validate intuitive decisions and guide on-going management. During simulations, PPH treatment was initiated at volumes at or below 200ml (fast mean blood loss 79.6ml, SD 41.1; slow mean blood loss 62.6ml, SD 27.7). All participants treated fast, visible blood loss, but only half treated slow blood loss, despite there being no difference in volumes (difference 18.2ml).
-
5.
Clinical usefulness of Red Dichromatic Imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: first report from a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial
Fujimoto A, Saito Y, Abe S, Hoteya S, Nomura K, Yasuda H, Matsuo Y, Uraoka T, Kuribayashi S, Tsuji Y, et al
Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. 2021
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To verify the efficacy and safety of Red Dichromatic Imaging (RDI) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent ESD of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum. Patients who received hemostatic treatments by RDI during ESD were defined as the RDI group (n=204), and those who received hemostatic treatments by white light imaging (WLI) were defined as the WLI group (n=200). The primary endpoint was a shortening of the hemostasis time. The secondary endpoints were a reduction of the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during the hemostatic treatment, a shortened treatment time, and a non-inferior perforation rate, in RDI versus WLI. RESULTS The mean hemostasis time in RDI (n=860) was not significantly shorter than that in WLI (n=1049) (62.3±108.1 versus 56.2±74.6 seconds; p=0.921). The median hemostasis time was significantly longer in RDI than in WLI (36.0 (18.0-71.0) versus 28.0 (14.0-66.0) seconds; p=0.001) in a sensitivity analysis. The psychological stress was significantly lower in RDI than in WLI (1.71±0.935 versus 2.03±1.038; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the ESD treatment time between RDI (n=161) and WLI (n=168) (58.0 (35.0-86.0) versus 60.0 (38.0-88.5) minutes; p=0.855). Four perforations were observed, but none of them took place during the hemostatic treatment. CONCLUSIONS Hemostatic treatment using RDI does not shorten the hemostasis time. RDI, however, is safe to use for hemostatic procedures and reduces the psychological stress experienced by endoscopists when they perform hemostatic treatment during ESD. UMIN000025134.
-
6.
The accuracy of aneurysm size in predicting rebleeding after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis
Yu Z, Zheng J, Guo R, Li M, Li H, Ma L, You C
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2020
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a severe cerebrovascular disease. Rebleeding is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome after aneurysmal SAH. However, the accuracy of aneurysm size for predicting rebleeding after aneurysmal SAH is still unclear. Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive accuracy of large aneurysm for rebleeding after SAH. METHODS We performed a literature search in PubMed and Embase. Original studies about aneurysm size and rebleeding after SAH were included. Two reviewers completed data extraction and quality assessment. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of large aneurysm for predicting rebleeding were calculated and shown in a forest plot. The overall accuracy of large aneurysm for predicting rebleeding after SAH was shown using a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Publication bias were assessed using Deeks' funnel plot. RESULTS A total of ten studies with 3889 patients met eligibility criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of large aneurysm for predicting rebleeding were 0.39 (95% CI 0.25-0.56) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82), respectively. The area under SROC curve was 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.71). Deeks' funnel plot did not show obvious publication bias among included studies in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSION The specificity of large aneurysm for predicting rebleeding after SAH is relatively high. However, its overall accuracy for predicting aneurysm rebleeding is not very satisfying. A comprehensive model should be developed to improve the accuracy of rebleeding prediction after SAH.
-
7.
Techniques for blood loss estimation in major non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tran A, Heuser J, Ramsay T, McIsaac DM, Martel G
Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
PURPOSE Estimated blood loss (EBL) is an important tool in clinical decision-making and surgical outcomes research. It guides perioperative transfusion practice and serves as a key predictor of short-term perioperative risks and long-term oncologic outcomes. Despite its widespread clinical and research use, there is no gold standard for blood loss estimation. We sought to systematically review and compare techniques for intraoperative blood loss estimation in major non-cardiac surgery with the objective of informing clinical estimation and research standards. SOURCE A structured search strategy was applied to Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March 2020, to identify studies comparing methods of intraoperative blood loss in adult patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. We summarized agreement between groups of pairwise comparisons as visual estimation vs formula estimation, visual estimation vs other, and formula estimation vs other. For each of these comparisons, we described tendencies for higher or lower EBL values, consistency of findings, pooled mean differences, standard deviations, and confidence intervals. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS We included 26 studies involving 3,297 patients in this review. We found that visual estimation is the most frequently studied technique. In addition, visual techniques tended to provide lower EBL values than formula-based estimation or other techniques, though this effect was not statistically significant in pooled analyses likely due to sample size limitations. When accounting for the contextual mean blood loss, similar case-to-case variation exists for all estimation techniques. CONCLUSIONS We found that significant case-by-case variation exists for all methods of blood loss evaluation and that there is significant disagreement between techniques. Given the importance placed on EBL, particularly for perioperative prognostication models, clinicians should consider the universal adoption of a practical and reproducible method for blood loss evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42015029439); registered: 18 November 2015.PROSPERO (CRD42015029439); registered: 18 November 2015.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery (26 studies, n= 3,297).
Intervention
Visual estimation of blood loss.
Comparison
Formula estimation of blood loss, and other tecnniques for estimating blood loss.
Outcome
Visual estimation was the most frequently studied technique. Visual techniques tended to provide lower estimated blood loss values than formula-based estimation or other techniques, though this effect was not statistically significant in pooled analyses. When accounting for the contextual mean blood loss, similar case-to-case variation existed for all estimation techniques.
-
8.
The more you lose the more you miss: accuracy of postpartum blood loss visual estimation. A systematic review of the literature
Natrella, M., Di Naro, E., Loverro, M., Benshalom-Tirosh, N., Trojano, G., Tirosh, D., Besser, L., Loverro, M. T., Mastrolia, S. A.
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2018;31(1):106-115
Abstract
Midwives and nurses have a key role in monitoring postpartum period. They represent the first line professional figure in quantifying blood loss, initiating early diagnosis of obstetric hemorrhage, and mobilizing a team response, if needed. These actions are crucial in determining maternal outcome in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). In our review we aimed to: (1) Provide a picture of PPH including its pathophysiology, epidemiology, and associated complications; (2) Discuss diagnosis of this dangerous postpartum event; and, (3) Especially evaluate the efficiency of the employment of visual blood loss estimation as a rapid way to suspect PPH and activate the patient assessment.
-
9.
Comparison of four methods of blood loss estimation after cesarean delivery
Withanathantrige, M., Goonewardene, M., Dandeniya, R., Gunatilake, P., Gamage, S.
International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2016;135(1):51-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess agreement between four different methods of blood loss estimation after lower-segment cesarean delivery (LSCD). METHODS A secondary analysis was undertaken of a randomized controlled trial of three timings of cord clamping during LSCD performed at a center in Sri Lanka between January 21 and April 30, 2013. Eligible women underwent prepartum LSCD at 37-39weeks of pregnancy. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was assessed by a combined method (direct measurements of spilled blood and sucker bottle volumes, and weighing of surgical towels and drapes before and after use), according to visual assessments by the surgeon and by anesthesiologists, and by measurement of preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels. RESULTS Among 156 participants, mean EBL was 502mL (95% CI 370-618) from the combined method, 506mL (412-643) calculated from hemoglobin levels, 484mL (367-621) by the surgeon's estimation, and 491mL (361-612) by anesthesiologists' estimation (P=0.32). Visual assessment of EBL by anesthesiologists had the best intraclass correlation (0.713) and limits of agreement with the combined method. There were no significant differences between the proportion of cases in which anesthesiologists and the surgeon underestimated or overestimated the EBL when compared with the combined method. CONCLUSION EBL should be ideally obtained by the combined method.
-
10.
A systematic review of definitions and reporting of bleeding outcome measures in haemophilia
Chai-Adisaksopha, C., Hillis, C., Thabane, L., Iorio, A.
Haemophilia : The Official Journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. 2015;21(6):731-5
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bleeding frequency is an important outcome commonly used in haemophilia studies. There is a variation in practice in how bleeding is measured and defined. AIM: The primary objective of this study was to determine how investigators define and report bleeding outcome measures. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and the CENTRAL were searched from January 1990 to January 2014. We retrieved all published studies that included patients with haemophilia A or B and reported some measures of bleeding. Two reviewers independently performed title and abstract screening, full-text review and data abstraction of the identified studies. RESULTS A total of 118 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Study designs were randomized controlled trials (RCT; 14%), cohort (68%), cross-sectional (5%) and others design (11%). The median duration of follow-up (Q1, Q3) was 20 (7.9, 50) months. We found 10 different bleeding outcomes reported [absolute number of bleeding 60 (50.8%) studies, annualized bleeding rate 60 (50.8%) studies, bleed per month 10 (8.5%) studies and others 11 (9.3%) studies]. Of these, 32 (27%) studies reported only mean or median without dispersion and 33 (28%) studies did not report any measures of central tendency (dispersion). CONCLUSIONS There is substantial variation in definitions and measures of bleeding outcomes in the haemophilia literature. This creates difficulty and limitations in comparing the outcomes between studies and in performing meta-analysis. The haemophilia research community needs to develop a consensus on a clear definition of bleeding and how to address the limitations associated with variations in measures of bleeding between centres and studies.
