1.
A pilot randomized clinical trial of cryopreserved versus liquid-stored platelet transfusion for bleeding in cardiac surgery: The cryopreserved versus liquid platelet-New Zealand pilot trial
McGuinness S, Charlewood R, Gilder E, Parke R, Hayes K, Morley S, Al-Ibousi A, Deans R, Howe B, Johnson L, et al
Vox sanguinis. 2021
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Platelets for transfusion have a shelf-life of 7 days, limiting availability and leading to wastage. Cryopreservation at -80°C extends shelf-life to at least 1 year, but safety and effectiveness are uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single centre blinded pilot trial enrolled adult cardiac surgery patients who were at high risk of platelet transfusion. If treating clinicians determined platelet transfusion was required, up to three units of either cryopreserved or liquid-stored platelets intraoperatively or during intensive care unit admission were administered. The primary outcome was protocol safety and feasibility. RESULTS Over 13 months, 89 patients were randomized, 23 (25.8%) of whom received a platelet transfusion. There were no differences in median blood loss up to 48 h between study groups, or in the quantities of study platelets or other blood components transfused. The median platelet concentration on the day after surgery was lower in the cryopreserved platelet group (122 × 10(3) /μl vs. 157 × 10(3) /μl, median difference 39.5 ×10(3) /μl, p = 0.03). There were no differences in any of the recorded safety outcomes, and no adverse events were reported on any patient. Multivariable adjustment for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics did not find study group to be a predictor of 24-h blood loss, red cell transfusion or a composite bleeding outcome. CONCLUSION This pilot randomized controlled trial demonstrated the feasibility of the protocol and adds to accumulating data supporting the safety of this intervention. Given the clear advantage of prolonged shelf-life, particularly for regional hospitals in New Zealand, a definitive non-inferiority phase III trial is warranted.
PICO Summary
Population
Adult cardiac surgery patients who were at high risk of platelet transfusion, enrolled in the CLIP-NZ Pilot study (n= 89).
Intervention
Cryopreserved platelet transfusion (n= 49).
Comparison
Liquid-stored platelet transfusion (n= 40).
Outcome
The primary outcome was protocol safety and feasibility. Over 13 months, 89 patients were randomized, 23 (25.8%) of whom received a platelet transfusion. There were no differences in median blood loss up to 48 hours between study groups, or in the quantities of study platelets or other blood components transfused. The median platelet concentration on the day after surgery was lower in the cryopreserved platelet group (122 × 10(3) /μl vs. 157 × 10(3) /μl, median difference 39.5 ×10(3) /μl). There were no differences in any of the recorded safety outcomes, and no adverse events were reported on any patient. Multivariable adjustment for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics did not find study group to be a predictor of 24 hours blood loss, red cell transfusion or a composite bleeding outcome.
2.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients taking prehospital antiplatelet therapy: Is there a role for platelet transfusions?
Alvikas J, Myers SP, Wessel CB, Okonkwo DO, Joseph B, Pelaez C, Doberstein C, Guillotte AR, Rosengart MR, Neal MD
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2020
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Platelet transfusion has been utilized to reverse platelet dysfunction in patients on pre-injury antiplatelets who have sustained a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH); however, there is little evidence to substantiate this practice. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review on the impact of platelet transfusion on survival, hemorrhage progression and need for neurosurgical intervention in patients with tICH on prehospital antiplatelet medication. METHODS Controlled, observational and randomized, prospective and retrospective studies describing tICH, pre-injury antiplatelet use, and platelet transfusion reported in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Cochrane Trials and Cochrane DARE databases between January 1987 and March 2019 were included. Investigations of concomitant anticoagulant use were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We calculated pooled estimates of relative effect of platelet transfusion on the risk of death, hemorrhage progression and need for neurosurgical intervention using the methods of Dersimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis established whether study size contributed to heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses determined whether antiplatelet type, additional blood products/reversal agents, or platelet function assays impacted effect size using meta-regression. RESULTS Twelve articles out of 18609 screened references were applicable to our PICOS questions were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed. We found no association between platelet transfusion and the risk of death in patients with tICH taking prehospital antiplatelets (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.76-2.18; p=0.346; I=32.5%). There was no significant reduction in hemorrhage progression (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.34-2.28; p=0.788; I=78.1%). There was no significant reduction in the need for neurosurgical intervention (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.53-1.90, p=0.996, I=59.1%, p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS Current evidence does not support the use of platelet transfusion in patients with tICH on prehospital antiplatelets highlighting the need for a prospective evaluation of this practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE level III, Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) on prehospital antiplatelet medication, (12 studies).
Intervention
Platelet transfusion to reverse platelet dysfunction.
Comparison
Outcome
No association was found between platelet transfusion and the risk of death in patients with tICH taking prehospital antiplatelets (OR 1.29, I2= 32.5%). There was no significant reduction in hemorrhage progression (OR 0.88, I2= 78.1%). There was no significant reduction in the need for neurosurgical intervention (OR 1.00, I2= 59.1%).