-
1.
Missingness matters: a secondary analysis of thromboelastography measurements from a recent prehospital randomized tranexamic acid clinical trial
Donohue, J. K., Iyanna, N., Lorence, J. M., Brown, J. B., Guyette, F. X., Eastridge, B. J., Nirula, R., Vercruysse, G. A., O'Keeffe, T., Joseph, B., et al
Trauma surgery & acute care open. 2024;9(1):e001346
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been hypothesized to mitigate coagulopathy in patients after traumatic injury. Despite previous prehospital clinical trials demonstrating a TXA survival benefit, none have demonstrated correlated changes in thromboelastography (TEG) parameters. We sought to analyze if missing TEG data contributed to this paucity of findings. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of the Study of Tranexamic Acid During Air Medical and Ground Prehospital Transport Trial. We compared patients that received TEG (YES-TEG) and patients unable to be sampled (NO-TEG) to analyze subgroups in which to investigate TEG differences. TEG parameter differences across TXA intervention arms were assessed within subgroups disproportionately present in the NO-TEG relative to the YES-TEG cohort. Generalized linear models controlling for potential confounders were applied to findings with p<0.10 on univariate analysis. RESULTS NO-TEG patients had lower prehospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) (100 (78, 140) vs 125 (88, 147), p<0.01), lower prehospital Glascow Coma Score (14 (3, 15) vs 15 (12, 15), p<0.01), greater rates of prehospital intubation (39.4% vs 24.4%, p<0.01) and greater mortality at 30 days (36.4% vs 6.8%, p<0.01). NO-TEG patients had a greater international normalized ratio relative to the YES-TEG subgroup (1.2 (1.1, 1.5) vs 1.1 (1.0, 1.2), p=0.04). Within a severe prehospital shock cohort (SBP<70), TXA was associated with a significant decrease in clot lysis at 30 min on multivariate analysis (β=-27.6, 95% CI (-51.3 to -3.9), p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Missing data, due to the logistical challenges of sampling certain severely injured patients, may be associated with a lack of TEG parameter changes on TXA administration in the primary analysis. Previous demonstration of TXA's survival benefit in patients with severe prehospital shock in tandem with the current findings supports the notion that TXA acts at least partially by improving clot integrity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients at risk for haemorrhage receiving tranexamic acid before hospitalization, enrolled in the Study of Tranexamic Acid During Air Medical and Ground Prehospital Transport (STAAMP) Trial (n= 903).
Intervention
Prehospital tranexamic acid (TXA) (n= 447).
Comparison
Placebo (n= 456).
Outcome
This study was a secondary analysis of the STAAMP trial, comparing patients that received thromboelastography (TEG) (YES-TEG, n= 837) and patients unable to be sampled (NO-TEG, n= 66) to analyze subgroups in which to investigate TEG differences. NO-TEG patients had lower prehospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) (100 (78, 140) vs. 125 (88, 147)), lower prehospital Glascow Coma Score (14 (3, 15) vs. 15 (12, 15)), greater rates of prehospital intubation (39.4% vs. 24.4%) and greater mortality at 30 days (36.4% vs. 6.8%). NO-TEG patients had a greater international normalized ratio relative to the YES-TEG subgroup (1.2 (1.1, 1.5) vs. 1.1 (1.0, 1.2)). Within a severe prehospital shock cohort (SBP< 70), TXA was associated with a significant decrease in clot lysis at 30 min on multivariate analysis (β= -27.6; 95% CI [-51.3, -3.9].
-
2.
Kidney disease in trials of perioperative tranexamic acid
Liu, C. W., Anih, J., Lebedeva, V., Gungor, A., Wang, C., Park, L., Roshanov, P. S.
Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2024;94:111417
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess how kidney disease is handled in randomized trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of perioperative tranexamic acid, and to evaluate its effects across levels of kidney function. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING We screened studies from a previous comprehensive systematic review, and updated its search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL to July 31, 2023. PATIENTS Patients undergoing non-obstetric surgery. INTERVENTIONS Intravenous tranexamic acid compared to placebo or usual care without tranexamic acid. MEASUREMENT We summarized the handling of kidney disease in eligibility criteria, dose adjustments for kidney function, and effects of tranexamic acid on thrombotic events, seizures, and bleeding by subgroups of kidney function. MAIN RESULTS We evaluated 300 trials with 53,085 participants; 45,958 participants (86.6%) were enrolled in 228 trials (76.0%) that explicitly excluded patients with kidney disease. Definitions of kidney diseased used for exclusion varied widely. Most were non-specific and some corresponded to mild disease. Only 5 trials adjusted dosing for kidney function. Meta-analysis of two large trials found tranexamic acid unlikely to substantially increase or decrease the occurrence of thrombotic events in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m(2) (RR, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.07) or ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.11; P for subgroup difference = 0.47), but both trials excluded patients with severe kidney disease. No analysis could be performed regarding seizure risk. One large trial in noncardiac surgery reported similar reduction in bleeding across subgroups of kidney function but excluded patients with creatinine clearance <30 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS The large evidence base supporting perioperative tranexamic acid suffers from broad and unjustified exclusion of patients with kidney disease. Typical perioperative dosing of tranexamic acid is likely safe and effective in patients with creatinine clearance >30 mL/min, but effects in more severe kidney disease are unknown.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients undergoing non-obstetric surgery (300 trials, n= 53,085).
Intervention
Intravenous tranexamic acid.
Comparison
Placebo or usual care without tranexamic acid.
Outcome
From all the included studies, 45,958 participants (86.6%) were enrolled in 228 trials (76.0%) that explicitly excluded patients with kidney disease. Definitions of kidney diseased used for exclusion varied widely. Most were non-specific and some corresponded to mild disease. Only 5 trials adjusted dosing for kidney function. Meta-analysis of two large trials found tranexamic acid unlikely to substantially increase or decrease the occurrence of thrombotic events in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m(2) (RR 0.95; 95% CI [0.83, 1.07]) or ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m(2) (RR 1.00; 95% CI [0.91, 1.11], but both trials excluded patients with severe kidney disease. No analysis could be performed regarding seizure risk. One large trial in non-cardiac surgery reported similar reduction in bleeding across subgroups of kidney function but excluded patients with creatinine clearance <30 mL/min.
-
3.
Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid in the Postoperative Period in Body Contour Surgery: Randomized Clinical Trial
Bayter-Marín, J. E., Hoyos, A., Cárdenas-Camarena, L., Peña-Pinzón, W., Bayter-Torres, A. F., Díaz-Díaz, C. A., McCormick-Méndez, M., Plata-Rueda, E. L., Niño-Carreño, C. S.
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. 2023;11(11):e5403
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tranexamic acid (TXA) is used to reduce bleeding in body contouring procedures; however, there are no studies that show the effectiveness of TXA when it is also used in the immediate postoperative period. METHODS A controlled, randomized, parallel, and open-label clinical trial was carried out in adult patients undergoing liposculpture and/or abdominoplasty. A control group administering presurgical TXA and a study group with presurgical and postsurgical TXA were formed. The decrease in hemoglobin and the incidence of blood transfusions between both groups were compared as well as the possible adverse effects of TXA. RESULTS Four hundred twenty-seven subjects were included, 208 (48.7%) in the control group and 219 (51.3%) in the study group. The median age was 34 years (interquartile range 28-42). Median postoperative hemoglobin levels at 24 hours were similar in both groups (study 11.3 g/dL versus control 11.1 g/dL, P = 0.07); however, at 72 hours, postoperative hemoglobin was higher in the study group versus control (10.8 versus 10.0 g/dL, P ≤ 0.001). The incidence of transfusions at 72 hours was 1.8% in the study group and 8.6% in the control group, for a risk ratio of 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.61). There were no adverse or thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION TXA proved to be more effective in reducing intra- and postsurgical bleeding and the need for transfusions, when used preoperatively and continued for 48 hours after surgery, than when used only preoperatively, without reporting adverse or thromboembolic effects.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients undergoing liposculpture and/or abdominoplasty (n= 427).
Intervention
Presurgical and postsurgical tranexamic acid (TXA), (study group, n= 219).
Comparison
Presurgical TXA (control group, n= 208).
Outcome
Median postoperative haemoglobin levels at 24 hours were similar in both groups (study 11.3 g/dL versus control 11.1 g/dL). At 72 hours, postoperative haemoglobin was higher in the study group versus control (10.8 versus 10.0 g/dL). The incidence of transfusions at 72 hours was 1.8% in the study group and 8.6% in the control group, for a risk ratio of 0.21; 95% confidence interval [0.07, 0.61]. There were no adverse or thromboembolic events.
-
4.
[Efficacy and safety of multiple-dose intravenous tranexamic acid for reducing blood loss in complex tibial plateau fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial]
Bao, W., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Chu, M.
Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery. 2023;37(9):1055-1061
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and safety of multiple-dose intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) for reducing blood loss in complex tibial plateau fractures with open reduction internal fixation by a prospective randomized controlled trial. METHODS A study was conducted on patients with Schatzker type Ⅳ-Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures admitted between August 2020 and December 2022. Among them, 88 patients met the selection criteria and were included in the study. They were randomly allocated into 3 groups, the control group (28 cases), single-dose TXA group (31 cases), and multiple-dose TXA group (29 cases), using a random number table method. There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in terms of age, gender, body mass index, the Schatzker type and side of fracture, laboratory examinations [hemoglobin (Hb), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen (Fib), international normalized ratio (INR), D-dimer, and interleukin 6 (IL-6)], and preoperative blood volume. The control group received intravenous infusion of 100 mL saline at 15 minutes before operation and 3, 6, and 24 hours after the first administration. The single-dose TXA group received intravenous infusion of 1 g TXA (dissolved in 100 mL saline) at 15 minutes before operation, followed by an equal amount of saline at each time point after the first administration. The multiple-dose TXA group received intravenous infusion of 1 g TXA (dissolved in 100 mL saline) at each time point. The relevant indicators were recorded and compared between groups to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TXA, including hospital stays, operation time, occurrence of infection; the occurrence of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, intermuscular vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism at 1 week after operation; the lowest postoperative Hb value and Hb reduction rate, the difference (change value) between pre- and post-operative APTT, PT, Fib, and INR; D-dimer and IL-6 at 24 and 72 hours after operation; total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, hidden blood loss, drainage flow during 48 hours after operation, and postoperative blood transfusion. RESULTS ① TXA efficacy evaluation: the lowest Hb value in the control group was significantly lower than that in the other two groups ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the single- and multiple-dose TXA groups ( P>0.05). The Hb reduction rate, total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, drainage flow during 48 hours after operation, and hidden blood loss showed a gradual decrease trend in the control group, single-dose TXA group, and multiple-dose TXA group. And differences were significant ( P<0.05) in the Hb reduction rate and drainage flow during 48 hours after operation between groups, and the total blood loss and hidden blood loss between control group and other two groups. ② TXA safety evaluation: no lower extremity deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred in the three groups after operation, but 3, 4, and 2 cases of intermuscular vein thrombosis occurred in the control group, single-dose TXA group, and multiple-dose TXA group, respectively, and the differences in the incidences between groups were not significant ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time between groups ( P>0.05). But the length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the control group than in the other groups ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the single- and multiple-dose TXA groups ( P>0.05). ③ Effect of TXA on blood coagulation and inflammatory response: the incisions of the 3 groups healed by first intention, and no infections occurred. The differences in the changes of APTT, PT, Fib, and INR between groups were not significant ( P>0.05). The D-dimer and IL-6 in the three groups showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing over time, and there was a significant difference between different time points in the three groups ( P<0.05). At 24 and 72 hours after operation, there was no significant difference in D-dimer between groups ( P>0.05), while there was a significant difference in IL-6 between groups ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION Multiple intravenous applications of TXA can reduce perioperative blood loss and shorten hospital stays in patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of complex tibial plateau fractures, provide additional fibrinolysis control and ameliorate postoperative inflammatory response.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with Schatzker type IV – VI tibial plateau fractures (n= 88).
Intervention
Single dose of tranexamic acid (TXA) intravenous infusion, (n= 31).
Comparison
Multiple dose of intravenous TXA (n= 29); normal saline (control group), (n= 28).
Outcome
TXA efficacy evaluation: The lowest haemoglobin (Hb) value in the control group was significantly lower than that in the other two groups, and there was no significant difference between the single and multiple dose TXA groups. The Hb reduction rate, total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, drainage flow during 48 hours after operation, and hidden blood loss showed a gradual decrease trend in the control group, single-dose TXA group, and multiple-dose TXA group. And differences were significant in the Hb reduction rate and drainage flow during 48 hours after operation between groups, and the total blood loss and hidden blood loss between control group and other two groups. TXA safety evaluation: No lower extremity deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred in the three groups after operation. There was no significant difference in the operation time between groups. But the length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the control group than in the other groups. Effect of TXA on blood coagulation and inflammatory response: The incisions of the 3 groups healed by first intention, and no infections occurred.
-
5.
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Topical Intrapleural Application of Tranexamic Acid in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Alzahrani, A., Alkofide, H., Joharji, H., Korayem, G. B., Aljohani, S., Alshareef, H., AlFaifi, M., Alalawi, H., Sulaiman, K. A.
Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2023;29:10760296231218215
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Bleeding remains a common complication post-thoracic surgery. Although intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to decrease blood loss, its use has been associated with adverse effects. Accordingly, topical TXA has been proposed as an alternative to reduce bleeding with fewer systemic complications. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical TXA versus control (i.e., placebo) in patients undergoing thoracic procedures. The primary outcome was total postoperative blood loss at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included were the number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Meta-analyses were pooled using mean difference with inverse-variance weighting and random-effects. RESULTS Out of the 575 unique studies that were screened, we identified three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 399 patients. Out of the three RCTs analyzed, two studies, accounting for 67% of the total, were found to have a low risk of bias. The primary outcome of 24-h post-operative blood loss was significantly lower in patients who received TXA (mean difference [MD] -93.6 ml, 95% CI -121.8 to -65.4 ml, I(2 )= 45%). In addition, the need for RBC transfusion was significantly lower in the topical TXA group compared to control (MD -0.5 units, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.3 units, I(2 )= 60%). However, there was no significant difference in the hospital length of stay (LOS) (MD -0.3 days, 95% CI -0.9 to 0.4 days, I(2 )= 0%). These results remained consistent after several sensitivity analyses. The use of topical intrapleural tranexamic acid has also been found to be safe without any significant safety concerns. CONCLUSION Topical intrapleural TXA reduces blood loss and the need for blood transfusions during thoracic surgery. In addition, there is no evidence of the increased safety concerns associated with its use. Larger trials are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the safety and efficacy of different dosages.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients undergoing thoracic surgery procedures (3 randomised controlled trials, n= 399).
Intervention
Topical intrapleural tranexamic acid (TXA).
Comparison
Placebo.
Outcome
The primary outcome of postoperative blood loss at 24 hours was significantly lower in patients who received TXA (mean difference [MD] -93.6 ml; 95% CI [-121.8, -65.4 ml], I(2)= 45%). The need for red blood cell transfusion was significantly lower in the topical TXA group compared to control (MD -0.5 units; 95% CI [-0.8, -0.3 units], I(2)= 60%). There was no significant difference in the hospital length of stay, (MD -0.3 days; 95% CI [-0.9, 0.4 days], I(2)= 0%). These results remained consistent after several sensitivity analyses.
-
6.
Tranexamic acid for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Cleveland, B., Norling, B., Wang, H., Gandhi, V., Price, C. L., Borofsky, M. S., Pais, V., Dahm, P.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2023;10(10):Cd015122
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard for the treatment of large kidney stones but comes with an increased risk of bleeding compared to other treatments, such as ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent that has been used to reduce bleeding complications in other settings. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of TXA in individuals with kidney stones undergoing PCNL. SEARCH METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, Global Index Medicus, trials registries, other sources of the grey literature, and conference proceedings. We applied no restrictions on the language of publication nor publication status. The latest search date was 11 May 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared treatment with PCNL with administration of TXA to placebo (or no TXA) for patients ≥ 18 years old. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently classified studies and abstracted data. Primary outcomes were: blood transfusion, stone-free rate (SFR), and thromboembolic events (TEEs). Secondary outcomes were: adverse events (AEs), secondary interventions, major surgical complications, minor surgical complications, unplanned hospitalizations or readmissions, and hospital length of stay (LOS). We performed statistical analyzes using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) according to the GRADE approach using a minimally contextualized approach with predefined thresholds for minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs). MAIN RESULTS We analyzed 10 RCTs assessing the effect of systemic TXA in PCNL versus placebo (or no TXA) with 1883 randomized participants. Eight studies were published as full text. One was published in abstract proceedings, but it was separated into two separate studies for the purpose of our analyzes. Average stone surface area ranged 3.45 to 6.62 cm(2). We also found a single RCT published in full text assessing the effects of topical TXA in PCNL versus placebo (or no TXA) with 400 randomized participants, the results of which are further described in the review. Here we focus only on the results of TXA used systemically. Blood transfusion - Based on a representative baseline risk of 5.7% for blood transfusions taken from a large presentative observational studies, systemic TXA may reduce blood transfusions (risk ratio (RR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.76; I(2) = 28%; 9 studies, 1353 participants; low CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 2%. Based on 57 participants per 1000 with placebo (or no TXA) being transfused, this corresponds to 31 fewer (from 42 fewer to 14 fewer) participants being transfused per 1000. Stone-free rate - Based on a representative baseline risk of 75.7% for SFR, systemic TXA may increase SFRs (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.27; I(2) = 62%; 4 studies, 603 participants; low CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 5%. Based on 757 participants per 1000 being stone free with placebo (or no TXA), this corresponds to 83 more (from 15 fewer to 204 more) stone-free participants per 1000. Thromboembolic events - There is probably no difference in TEEs (risk difference (RD) 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; I(2) = 0%; 6 studies, 841 participants; moderate CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 2%. Since there were no thromboembolic events in intervention and/or control groups in 5 out of6 studies, we opted to assess a risk difference with systemic TXA for this outcome. Adverse events - Systemic TXA may increase AEs (RR 5.22, 95% CI 0.52 to 52.72; I(2) = 75%; 4 studies, 602 participants; low CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 5%. Based on 23 participants per 1000 with placebo (or no TXA) having an adverse event, this corresponds to 98 more (from 11 fewer to 1000 more) participants with adverse events per 1000. Secondary interventions - Systemic TXA may have little to no effect on secondary interventions (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.57; I(2) = 0%; 2 studies, 319 participants; low CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 5%. Based on 278 participants per 1000 with placebo (or no TXA) having a secondary intervention, this corresponds to 42 more (from 44 fewer to 158 more) participants with secondary interventions per 1000. Major surgical complications - Based on a representative baseline risk for major surgical complications of 4.1%, systemic TXA may reduce major surgical complications (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62; I(2) = 0%; 5 studies, 733 participants; moderate CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 2%. Based on 41 participants per 1000 with placebo (or no TXA) having a major surgical complication, this corresponds to 26 fewer (from 32 fewer to 16 fewer) participants with major surgical complications per 1000. Minor surgical complications - Systemic TXA may reduce minor surgical complications (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.10; I(2) = 76%; 5 studies, 733 participants; low CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 5%. Based on 396 participants per 1000 with placebo (or no TXA) having a minor surgical complication, this corresponds to 115 fewer (from 218 fewer to 40 more) participants with minor surgical complications per 1000. Unplanned hospitalizations or readmissions - We are very uncertain how unplanned hospitalizations or readmissions are affected (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.45 to 5.31; I(2) = not applicable; 1 study, 189 participants; very low CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 2%. Hospital length of stay - Systemic TXA may reduce hospital LOS (mean difference 0.52 days lower, 95% CI 0.93 lower to 0.11 lower; I(2) = 98%; 7 studies, 1151 participants; low CoE). We assumed an MCID of ≥ 0.5 days. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on 10 RCTs with substantial methodological limitations that lowered all CoE of effect, we found that systemic TXA in PCNL may reduce blood transfusions, major and minor surgical complications, and hospital LOS, as well as improve SFRs; however, it may increase AEs. We are uncertain about the effects of systemic TXA on other outcomes. Findings of this review should assist urologists and their patients in making informed decisions about the use of TXA in the setting of PCNL.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with kidney stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), (10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), n= 1,883).
Intervention
Tranexamic acid.
Comparison
Placebo or no tranexamic acid.
Outcome
The primary outcomes were: blood transfusion, stone-free rate, and thromboembolic events. Based on 10 RCTs with substantial methodological limitations that lowered all certainty of evidence of effect, the authors found that systemic tranexamic acid in PCNL may reduce blood transfusions, major and minor surgical complications, and hospital length of stay, as well as improve stone-free rates; however, it may increase adverse events. The authors were uncertain about the effects of systemic TXA on other outcomes.
-
7.
Topical Tranexamic Acid in Breast Reconstruction: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
Safran T, Vorstenbosch J, Viezel-Mathieu A, Davison P, Dionisopoulos T
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2023
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Excess fluid accumulation (seroma/hematoma) around the breast implant post reconstruction can lead to significant complications. Topical administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) may reduce fluid accumulation and reduce post-operative complications. This trial aims to investigate if TXA treated mastectomy pockets will exhibit less postoperative fluid production and complications. METHODS This paired, double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial enrolled patients undergoing bilateral mastectomies with immediate direct to implant reconstruction. In each patient, one breast was randomized to receive 3g TXA (100cc), and the other received 100cc of NS. The blinded solutions were soaked in the mastectomy pocket for five minutes before implant placement. Postoperatively, daily drain outputs, complications, and baseline demographics were recorded. RESULTS 53 eligible patients, representing 106 breasts, were enrolled. All patients underwent bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomies. After randomization, TXA was placed in the right breast in 56.6% (n=30) of patients. The use of topical TXA resulted in a mean drain output reduction of 30.5% (RANGE -83.6% - 26.6%). Drains on the TXA treated breast were eligible for removal 1.4(RANGE 0-4) days sooner than the control side. TXA treated group had three complications (5.67%) versus 15 (28.3%) in the control group (Odds Ratio: 0.1920, p= 0.0129). Specifically, for operative hematomas, the TXA group had none(0%) versus three in the control group (5.7%)(Odds Ratio: 0.1348, P=0.18). CONCLUSION Soaking the mastectomy bed with 3% topical TXA before implant insertion leads to a decrease in drain output and a decrease in complications. Topical administration of TXA represents an option to decrease complications in alloplastic breast reconstruction.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients undergoing bilateral mastectomies with immediate direct to implant reconstruction (n= 53, representing 106 breasts).
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (TXA).
Comparison
Normal saline.
Outcome
After randomization, TXA was placed in the right breast in 56.6% (n= 30) of patients. The use of topical TXA resulted in a mean drain output reduction of 30.5% (Range: -83.6% - 26.6%). Drains on the TXA treated breast were eligible for removal 1.4 (Range: 0 - 4) days sooner than the control side. TXA treated group had three complications (5.67%) versus 15 (28.3%) in the normal saline group (Odds Ratio: 0.1920). Specifically, for operative haematomas, the TXA group had none (0%) versus three in the normal saline group (5.7%), (Odds Ratio: 0.1348).
-
8.
Prehospital Tranexamic Acid for Severe Trauma
Gruen, R. L., Mitra, B., Bernard, S. A., McArthur, C. J., Burns, B., Gantner, D. C., Maegele, M., Cameron, P. A., Dicker, B., Forbes, A. B., et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2023
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether prehospital administration of tranexamic acid increases the likelihood of survival with a favorable functional outcome among patients with major trauma and suspected trauma-induced coagulopathy who are being treated in advanced trauma systems is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned adults with major trauma who were at risk for trauma-induced coagulopathy to receive tranexamic acid (administered intravenously as a bolus dose of 1 g before hospital admission, followed by a 1-g infusion over a period of 8 hours after arrival at the hospital) or matched placebo. The primary outcome was survival with a favorable functional outcome at 6 months after injury, as assessed with the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E). Levels on the GOS-E range from 1 (death) to 8 ("upper good recovery" [no injury-related problems]). We defined survival with a favorable functional outcome as a GOS-E level of 5 ("lower moderate disability") or higher. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause within 28 days and within 6 months after injury. RESULTS A total of 1310 patients were recruited by 15 emergency medical services in Australia, New Zealand, and Germany. Of these patients, 661 were assigned to receive tranexamic acid, and 646 were assigned to receive placebo; the trial-group assignment was unknown for 3 patients. Survival with a favorable functional outcome at 6 months occurred in 307 of 572 patients (53.7%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 299 of 559 (53.5%) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.12; P = 0.95). At 28 days after injury, 113 of 653 patients (17.3%) in the tranexamic acid group and 139 of 637 (21.8%) in the placebo group had died (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). By 6 months, 123 of 648 patients (19.0%) in the tranexamic acid group and 144 of 629 (22.9%) in the placebo group had died (risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.03). The number of serious adverse events, including vascular occlusive events, did not differ meaningfully between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Among adults with major trauma and suspected trauma-induced coagulopathy who were being treated in advanced trauma systems, prehospital administration of tranexamic acid followed by an infusion over 8 hours did not result in a greater number of patients surviving with a favorable functional outcome at 6 months than placebo. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and others; PATCH-Trauma ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02187120.).
PICO Summary
Population
Adult patients with severe trauma and at risk for trauma induced coagulopathy, enrolled in the PATCH-Trauma trial in 15 emergency medical services in Australia, New Zealand, and Germany (n= 1,310).
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (n= 661).
Comparison
Placebo (n= 646).
Outcome
Survival with a favorable functional outcome at 6 months occurred in 307 of 572 patients (53.7%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 299 of 559 (53.5%) in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), [0.90, 1.12]. At 28 days after injury, 113 of 653 patients (17.3%) in the tranexamic acid group and 139 of 637 (21.8%) in the placebo group had died (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI [0.63, 0.99]. By 6 months, 123 of 648 patients (19.0%) in the tranexamic acid group and 144 of 629 (22.9%) in the placebo group had died (risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI [0.67, 1.03]. The number of serious adverse events, including vascular occlusive events, did not differ meaningfully between the groups.
-
9.
Prehospital tranexamic acid is associated with a dose-dependent decrease in syndecan-1 after trauma: A secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial
Gruen DS, Brown JB, Guyette FX, Johansson PI, Stensballe J, Li SR, Leeper CM, Eastridge BJ, Nirula R, Vercruysse GA, et al
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2023
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Study of Tranexamic Acid During Air and Ground Prehospital Transport (STAAMP) Trial, prehospital tranexamic acid (TXA) was associated with lower mortality in specific patient subgroups. The underlying mechanisms responsible for a TXA benefit remain incompletely characterized. We hypothesized that TXA may mitigate endothelial injury and sought to assess whether TXA was associated with decreased endothelial or tissue damage markers among all patients enrolled in the STAAMP Trial. METHODS We collected blood samples from STAAMP Trial patients and measured markers of endothelial function and tissue damage including syndecan-1, soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) at hospital admission (0 hours) and 12, 24, and 72 hours after admission. We compared these marker values for patients in each treatment group during the first 72 hours, and modeled the relationship between TXA and marker concentration using regression analysis to control for potential confounding factors. RESULTS We analyzed samples from 766 patients: 383 placebo, 130 abbreviated dosing, 119 standard dosing, and 130 repeat dosing. Lower levels of syndecan-1, TM, and PECAM measured within the first 72 hours of hospital admission were associated with survival at 30 days (P < 0.001). At hospital admission, syndecan-1 was lower in the TXA group (28.30 [20.05, 42.75] vs. 33.50 [23.00, 54.00] P = 0.001) even after controlling for patient, injury, and prehospital factors (P = 0.001). For every 1 g increase in TXA administered over the first 8 hours of prehospital transport and hospital admission, there was a 4 ng/mL decrease in syndecan-1 at 12 hours controlling for patient, injury, and treatment factors (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Prehospital TXA was associated with decreased syndecan-1 at hospital admission. Syndecan-1 measured 12 hours after admission was inversely related to the dose of TXA received. Early pre- and in-hospital TXA may decrease endothelial glycocalyx damage or upregulate vascular repair mechanisms in a dose-dependent fashion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, Secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial.
PICO Summary
Population
Injured patients who received prehospital tranexamic acid (TXA) and were at risk for haemorrhage enrolled in the STAAMP randomised controlled trial (n= 766).
Intervention
Abbreviated dose: 1g of TXA (n= 130). Standard dose: 2g of TXA (n= 119). Repeat dose: 3g of TXA (n= 130).
Comparison
Placebo (saline), (n= 383).
Outcome
Blood samples were collected to measure markers of endothelial function and tissue damage including syndecan-1, soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) at hospital admission and 12, 24, and 72 hours after admission. Lower levels of syndecan-1, TM, and PECAM measured within the first 72 hours of hospital admission were associated with survival at 30 days. At hospital admission (mean ng/mL [IQR]), syndecan-1 was lower in the TXA group than the placebo group (28.30 [20.05, 42.75] vs. 33.50 [23.00, 54.00]) even after controlling for patient, injury, and prehospital factors. For every 1g increase in TXA administered over the first 8 hours of prehospital transport and hospital admission, there was a 4 ng/mL decrease in syndecan-1 at 12 hours controlling for patient, injury, and treatment factors.
-
10.
Tranexamic Acid to Prevent Obstetrical Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery
Pacheco LD, Clifton RG, Saade GR, Weiner SJ, Parry S, Thorp JM Jr, Longo M, Salazar A, Dalton W, Tita ATN, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2023;388(15):1365-1375
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic use of tranexamic acid at the time of cesarean delivery has been shown to decrease the calculated blood loss, but the effect on the need for blood transfusions is unclear. METHODS We randomly assigned patients undergoing cesarean delivery at 31 U.S. hospitals to receive either tranexamic acid or placebo after umbilical-cord clamping. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or blood transfusion by hospital discharge or 7 days post partum, whichever came first. Key secondary outcomes were estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter (prespecified as a major secondary outcome), interventions for bleeding and related complications, the preoperative-to-postoperative change in the hemoglobin level, and postpartum infectious complications. Adverse events were assessed. RESULTS A total of 11,000 participants underwent randomization (5529 to the tranexamic acid group and 5471 to the placebo group); scheduled cesarean delivery accounted for 50.1% and 49.2% of the deliveries in the respective groups. A primary-outcome event occurred in 201 of 5525 participants (3.6%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 233 of 5470 (4.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; 95.26% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.07; P = 0.19). Estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter occurred in 7.3% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 8.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.05). Interventions for bleeding complications occurred in 16.1% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 18.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.97); the change in the hemoglobin level was -1.8 g per deciliter and -1.9 g per deciliter, respectively (mean difference, -0.1 g per deciliter; 95% CI, -0.2 to -0.1); and postpartum infectious complications occurred in 3.2% and 2.5% of the participants, respectively (relative risk, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61). The frequencies of thromboembolic events and other adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic use of tranexamic acid during cesarean delivery did not lead to a significantly lower risk of a composite outcome of maternal death or blood transfusion than placebo. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03364491.).
PICO Summary
Population
Patients undergoing caesarean delivery at 31 U.S. hospitals (n= 11,000).
Intervention
Tranexamic acid (n= 5,529).
Comparison
Placebo (n= 5,471).
Outcome
The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or blood transfusion by hospital discharge or 7 days postpartum, whichever came first. A primary-outcome event occurred in 201 of 5,525 participants (3.6%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 233 of 5,470 (4.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; 95.26% CI [0.74, 1.07]). Estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 litre occurred in 7.3% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 8.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI [0.79, 1.05]). Interventions for bleeding complications occurred in 16.1% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 18.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% CI [0.82, 0.97]); the change in the haemoglobin level was -1.8 g per decilitre and -1.9 g per decilitre, respectively (mean difference, -0.1 g per decilitre; 95% CI [-0.2, -0.1]); and postpartum infectious complications occurred in 3.2% and 2.5% of the participants, respectively (relative risk, 1.28; 95% CI [1.02, 1.61]). The frequencies of thromboembolic events and other adverse events were similar in the two groups.