BACKGROUND:

Disruption of the vascular endothelium and endothelial glycocalyx (EG) has been described after severe trauma. Plasma has been suggested to restore microvascular integrity by preservation and repair of the EG. We sought to evaluate whether plasma administered in a 1:1:1 ratio was associated with less endothelial marker circulation than a 1:1:2 ratio.

METHODS:

This is a secondary analysis of the PROPPR trial, which investigated post-traumatic resuscitation with platelets, plasma, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 ratio compared with a 1:1:2 ratio. Syndecan-1, soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) were quantified for each treatment group on admission and at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours. Patients were excluded if they did not survive longer than 3 hours or had data from fewer than two time points.

RESULTS:

Three hundred eight patients in the 1:1:1 group and 291 in the 1:1:2 group were analyzed. There were no statistically significant differences in syndecan-1, sTM, or RAGE between treatment groups at any time point ( p > 0.05). Patients who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, and death had significantly elevated biomarker expression at most time points when compared with patients who did not develop these sequelae ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Administration of FFP in a 1:1:1 ratio does not consistently affect circulation of endothelial biomarkers following significant trauma when compared with a 1:1:2 ratio. The development of post-traumatic ARDS, AKI, and death was associated with increased endothelial biomarker circulation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine whether it is safe to use a conservative packed red blood cell transfusion hemoglobin (Hgb) threshold (5.5 g/dL) compared with a liberal transfusion threshold (7.0 g/dL) for asymptomatic musculoskeletal injured trauma patients who are no longer in the initial resuscitative period.

METHODS:

Design: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

SETTING:

Three level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA:

Patients aged 18-50 with an associated musculoskeletal injury with Hgb less than 9 g/dL or expected drop below 9 g/dL with planned surgery who were stable and no longer being actively resuscitated were randomized once their Hgb dropped below 7 g/dL to a conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL versus a liberal threshold of 7.0 g/dL.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS:

Postoperative infection, other post-operative complications and Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment scores obtained at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year were compared for liberal and conservative transfusion thresholds.

RESULTS:

Sixty-five patients completed 1 year follow-up. There was a significant association between a liberal transfusion strategy and higher rate of infection (P = 0.01), with no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. This study was adequately powered at 92% to detect a difference in superficial infection (7% for liberal group, 0% for conservative, P < 0.01) but underpowered to detect a difference for deep infection (14% for liberal group, 6% for conservative group, P = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS:

A conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL in an asymptomatic young trauma patient with associated musculoskeletal injuries leads to a lower infection rate without an increase in adverse outcomes and no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND:

Transfusion of granulocytes obtained by apheresis is beneficial in febrile neutropenia (FN) but expensive and time-consuming. Buffy-coat-derived granulocytes could be an alternative. We studied the efficacy and safety of the administration of irradiated buffy-coat-derived granulocytes along with the standard of care in pediatric high-risk (HR) FN.

METHODS:

Sixty children ≤18 years with malignancy and chemotherapy-induced HR FN were randomized to either the granulocyte transfusion (GT) arm which received irradiated buffy-coat derived granulocyte transfusion along with the standard treatment or the standard treatment (ST) arm.

RESULTS:

Baseline characteristics, day-to-defervescence, antibiotic duration, hospital stay, and mortality were comparable between the groups. A significant difference was seen in days to achieve absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >500/mm3 in the 2 groups: 4.5 days (3-6.5) in the GT arm v/s 8 days (4-11) in the ST arm (P=0.01).

CONCLUSION:

Buffy-coat-derived granulocyte transfusion was safe and led to early hematological recovery but was not associated with survival benefits. Future studies with earlier initiation in the intended dose could be undertaken to generate more evidence.