1.
Meta-analysis of individual patient data of albumin dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: focus on treatment intensity
Banares R, Ibanez-Samaniego L, Torner JM, Pavesi M, Olmedo C, Catalina MV, Albillos A, Larsen FS, Nevens F, Hassanein T, et al
Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology. 2019;12:1756284819879565
Abstract
Background: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a common complication of cirrhosis characterized by single or multiple organ failures and high short-term mortality. Treatment of ACLF consists of standard medical care (SMC) and organ(s) support. Whether the efficacy of artificial liver support (ALS) depends on the severity of ACLF or on the intensity of this treatment, or both, is unclear. This study aimed to further assess these issues. Methods: We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in ACLF patients enrolled in prior randomized control trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis was designed to assess the effect of patient severity (ACLF grade) and treatment intensity [low-intensity therapy (LIT), SMC alone or SMC plus 4 MARS sessions, high-intensity therapy (HIT), SMC plus > 4 MARS sessions] on mortality. Results: Three RCTs suitable for the meta-analysis (n = 285, ACLF patients = 165) were identified in a systematic review. SMC plus MARS (irrespective of the number of sessions) did not improve survival compared with SMC alone, neither in the complete population nor in the ACLF patients. Survival, however, was significantly improved in the subgroup of patients receiving HIT both in the entire cohort (10-day survival: 98.6% versus 82.8%, p = 0.001; 30-day survival: 73.9% versus 64.3%, p = 0.032) and within the ACLF patients (10-day survival: 97.8% versus 78.6%, p = 0.001; 30-day survival: 73.3% versus 58.5%, p = 0.041). Remarkably, HIT increased survival independently of ACLF grade. Independent predictors of survival were age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), ACLF grade, number of MARS sessions received, and intensity of MARS therapy. Conclusion: HIT with albumin dialysis may improve survival in patients with ACLF. Appropriate treatment schedules should be determined in future clinical trials.
2.
Stratifying risk in the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage: results of an individual patient meta-analysis
Albillos A, Zamora J, Martinez J, Arroyo D, Ahmad I, De-la-Pena J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Lo GH, Sarin S, Sharma B, et al
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2017;66((4):):1219-1231
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Endoscopic variceal ligation plus beta-blockers (EVL+BB) is currently recommended for variceal rebleeding prophylaxis, a recommendation that extends to all patients with cirrhosis with previous variceal bleeding irrespective of prognostic stage. Individualizing patient care is relevant and, in published studies on variceal rebleeding prophylaxis, there is a lack of information regarding response to therapy by prognostic stage. This study aimed at comparing EVL plus BB with monotherapy (EVL or BB) on all-source rebleeding and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and previous variceal bleeding stratified by cirrhosis severity (Child A vs. B/C) by means of individual time-to-event patient data meta-analysis (IPD) from randomized controlled trials. The study was IPD of 389 patients from 3 trials comparing EVL plus BB vs. BB and 416 patients from 4 trials comparing EVL plus BB vs. EVL. Compared with BB alone, EVL plus BB reduced overall rebleeding in Child A (incidence rate ratio 0.40; 95%CI 0.18-0.89; p=0.025), but not in Child B/C, without differences in mortality. The effect of EVL on rebleeding was different according to Child (p for interaction <0.001). Conversely, compared with EVL, EVL plus BB reduced rebleeding in both Child A and B/C, with a significant reduction in mortality in Child B/C (incidence rate ratio 0.46; 95%CI 0.25-0.85; p=0.013). CONCLUSION Outcomes of therapies to prevent variceal rebleeding differ depending on cirrhosis severity. In patients with preserved liver function (Child A), combination therapy is recommended since it is more effective in preventing rebleeding, without modifying survival. In patients with advanced liver failure (Child B/C), EVL alone carries an increased risk of rebleeding and death as compared with combination therapy, underlining that BB is the key element of combination therapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.