1.
Tranexamic acid for subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Feng Y, Chen H
The American journal of emergency medicine. 2021;50:748-752
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of tranexamic acid for subarachnoid hemorrhage remains controversial. Thus, we conduct this meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of tranexamic acid for subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of tranexamic acid on subarachnoid hemorrhage were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model. RESULTS Five RCTs and 2359 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for subarachnoid hemorrhage, tranexamic acid was associated with significantly reduced risk of rebleeding (Odd ratio [OR] =0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.41 to 0.93; P = 0.02), but had no influence on mortality (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.18; P = 0.61), poor outcome (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.48; P = 0.82), hydrocephalus (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.46; P = 0.17) or delayed cerebral ischemia (OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 0.78 to 2.04; P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS Tranexamic acid may be effective to reduce the risk of rebleeding in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
2.
Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery
Sun L, Guo R, Feng Y
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2020;28(2):94-104
Abstract
Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely used during craniofacial and orthognathic surgery (OS). However, results of the literature are inconsistent due to specific type of surgery and a small sample of studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of TXA in bimaxillary OS. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared effect of TXA on bimaxillary OS with placebo. Outcomes of interests included intraoperative blood loss, allogenic transfusion, operation time, and volume of irrigation fluid. Random effects models were chosen considering that heterogeneity between studies was anticipated, and I (2) statistics were used to test for the presence of heterogeneity. Results: Totally 6 RCTs were identified. Tranexamic acid resulted in significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -264.82 mL; 95% CI: -380.60 to -149.04 mL) and decreased amounts of irrigation fluid (WMD = -229.23 mL; 95% CI: -399.63 to -58.83 mL). However, TXA had no remarkable impact on risk of allogenic blood transfusion (pooled risk ratio = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.20-1.23), operation time (WMD = -8.71 min; 95% CI: -20.98 to 3.57 min), and length of hospital stay (WMD = -0.24 day; 95% CI: -0.62 to 0.14 day). No TXA-associated severe adverse reactions or complications were observed. Conclusions: Currently available meta-analysis reveals that TXA is effective in decreasing intraoperative blood loss; however, it does not reduce the risk of allogenic blood transfusion in bimaxillary OS.
3.
Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Decreases Blood Transfusion in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Meta-analysis
Sun L, An H, Feng Y
The heart surgery forum. 2020;23(1):E039-e049
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely used during on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery owing to its antifibrinolytic effect. However, the efficacy and safety of TXA in off-pump CABG surgery remains unconfirmed, especially intravenous (IV) administration. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IV administration of TXA in off-pump CABG settings. METHODS AND RESULTS A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared IV use of TXA with placebo in the reduction of postoperative 24-hour blood transfusion, as well as postoperative death and thrombotic events. The combined estimations were compiled with a fixed-effects model or, if heterogeneity existed, a random-effects model. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess potential publication bias. Subgroup analyses were used to explore possible sources of heterogeneity. In total, 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. IV administration of TXA significantly reduced the risk of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion [risk ratio (RR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.503 to 0.756, P < .001, I2 = 0.0%) during the 24 hours after surgery. However, there was no statistical significance in platelet (RR = 0.613, 95% CI 0.112 to 3.348, P = .572, I2 = 0.0%) or total fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (RR = 0.511, 95% CI 0.246 to 1.063, P = .073, I2 = 0.0%) transfusion. Also, no significant difference was found in major adverse events (death or thrombotic complications) (RR = 0.917, 95% CI 0.532 to 1.581, P = .756, I2 = 0.0%) between the 2 groups. Interestingly, further subgroup analysis demonstrated that IV TXA decreased the risk of prothrombin time (PT)- and international normalized ratio (INR)-guided FFP transfusion (RR = 0.462, 95% CI 0.296 to 0.721, P = .001, I2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSION IV TXA was effective in reducing allogeneic blood component transfusion (PRBCs and PT- or INR-guided FFP transfusion), without increasing the incidence of postoperative death or thrombotic complications in off-pump CAB surgery.