-
1.
Volume-dependent effect of stored red blood cells: A secondary analysis of the Age of Blood Evaluation trial
Mack J, Kahn SR, Tinmouth A, Fergusson D, Hébert PC, Lacroix J
Transfusion. 2020
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increased risk of complications, including death, has been associated with stored red blood cell (RBC) units in observational studies but not in randomized trials. We aimed to evaluate for volume-dependent effects attributable to length of RBC storage in a secondary analysis of the Age of Blood Evaluation (ABLE) trial. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS In the 2510 critically ill adults from the ABLE trial randomized to receive RBC units stored not more than 7 days or the oldest compatible RBC units, we estimated the hazard ratio (HR) for death by intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge and by days 28, 90, and 180, within subgroups defined by the number of RBC units received. Extended Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the HR. RESULTS A volume-dependent effect of storage age on survival was present for death by 90 and 180 days, but not earlier endpoints. The HR for death by 90 days was 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.98, fresh vs standard) after transfusion of 6 RBC units but 1.45 (95% CI, 1.06-1.98) after transfusion of 1 RBC unit. CONCLUSION In this exploratory analysis, volume-dependent effects related to RBC storage were documented in the ABLE trial. The harms associated with small volumes of fresh RBC units and large volumes of older RBC units should be further explored.
-
2.
Effect of age of transfused red blood cells on neurologic outcome following traumatic brain injury (ABLE-tbi Study): a nested study of the Age of Blood Evaluation (ABLE) trial
Ruel-Laliberte J, Lessard Bonaventure P, Fergusson D, Lacroix J, Zarychanski R, Lauzier F, Tinmouth A, Hebert PC, Green R, Griesdale D, et al
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2019;66(6):696-705
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anemia is common in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury, and often requires red blood cell transfusion. Studies suggest that prolonged storage causes lesions of the red blood cells, including a decreased ability to carry oxygen. Considering the susceptibility of the brain to hypoxemia, victims of traumatic brain injury may thus be more vulnerable to exposure to older red blood cells. METHODS Our study aimed to ascertain whether the administration of fresh red blood cells (seven days or less) results in a better neurologic outcome compared with standard red blood cells in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury requiring transfusion. The Age of Blood Evaluation in traumatic brain injury (ABLE-tbi) study was a nested study within the ABLE study (ISRCTN44878718). Our primary outcome was the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSe) at six months. RESULTS In the ABLE study, 217 subjects suffered a traumatic brain injury: 110 in the fresh group, and 107 in the standard group. In the fresh group, 68 (73.1%) of the patients had an unfavourable neurologic outcome (GOSe <= 4) compared with 60 (64.5%) in the standard group (P = 0.21). Using a sliding dichotomy approach, we observed no overall effect of fresh red blood cells on neurologic outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 2.50; P = 0.35) but observed differences across prognostic bands with a decreased odds of unfavourable outcome in patients with the best prognosis at baseline (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.96; P = 0.04) but an increased odds in those with intermediate and worst baseline prognosis (OR, 5.88; 95% CI,1.66 to 20.81; P = 0.006; and OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.53 to 5.30; P = 0.38, respectively). CONCLUSION Overall, transfusion of fresh red blood cells was not associated with a better neurologic outcome at six months in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude a differential effect according to the patient baseline prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION ABLE study (ISRCTN44878718); registered 22 August, 2008.
-
3.
Red blood cell transfusion in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Boutin A, Chasse M, Shemilt M, Lauzier F, Moore L, Zarychanski R, Griesdale D, Desjardins P, Lacroix J, Fergusson D, et al
Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2016;30((1)):15-24.
Abstract
Our objectives were to evaluate the frequency of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) as well as potential determinants and outcomes associated with RBC transfusion in this population. We conducted a systematic review of cohort studies and randomized trials of patients with TBI. We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and BIOSIS databases from their inception up to April 2015. We selected studies of adult patients with acute TBI reporting data on RBC transfusions. Cumulative incidences of transfusion were pooled using random-effect models with a DerSimonian approach. To evaluate the association between RBC transfusion and potential determinants or clinical outcomes, we pooled risk ratios or mean differences with random-effect models and the Mantel-Haenszel method. We identified 24 eligible studies (17414 patients). After pooling data from 23 studies (7524 patients), approximately 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28-44; I(2) = 98%) of patients received RBC transfusion at some point during their hospital stay. Hemoglobin thresholds for transfusion were rarely available (reported in 9 studies) and varied from 6 to 10 g/dL. Glasgow Coma Scale scores at admission were lower in patients who were transfused than those who were not (3 cohort studies; 1371 patients; mean difference of 1.38 points [95% CI, 0.86-1.89]; I(2) = 12%). Mortality was not significantly different among transfused and nontransfused patients in univariate and multivariate meta-analyses. Hospital length of stay was longer among patients receiving RBC transfusion compared to those who did not (3 studies; n = 455; mean difference, 9.58 days [95% CI, 3.94-15.22]; I(2) = 74%). Results should be considered cautiously due to the high heterogeneity and high risk of confounding from the observational nature of included studies. Red blood cell transfusion is frequent in patients with TBI, and transfusion practices varied widely between studies. Current published data highlight the lack of clinical evidence guiding transfusion strategies in TBI. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
-
4.
The ABLE study: a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of fresh red cell units to improve the outcome of transfused critically ill adults . French
Lacroix J, Hebert PC, Fergusson D, Tinmouth A, Capellier G, Tiberghien P, Bardiaux L, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Transfusion Clinique et Biologique. 2015;22((3)):107-11.
Abstract
Red blood cell units are stored up to 42 days post-collection. The standard policy of blood banks is to deliver the oldest units in order to limit blood wastage. Many caregivers believe that giving fresh rather than old units can improve the outcome of their transfused patients. The ABLE study aims to check if the transfusion of red blood cell units stored seven days or less (fresh arm) improve the outcome of transfused critically ill adults compared to patients who received units delivered according to the standard delivery policy (control arm). From March 2009 to May 2014, 1211 patients were allocated to the fresh arm, 1219 to the control arm (length of storage: 6.1+/-4.9 and 22.0+/-8.4 days respectively, P<0.001). The primary outcome measure was 90-day all-cause mortality post-randomisation: there were 448 deaths (37.0%) in the fresh arm and 430 (35.3%) in the control arm (absolute risk difference: 1.7%; 95% confidence interval: -2.1% to 5.5%). In a survival analysis, the risk of death was higher in the fresh arm (hazard ratio: 1.1; 95%CI: 0.9 to 1.2), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.38). The same trend against the fresh arm was observed with all but one secondary outcome measures. The conclusion is that the transfusion of red blood cell units stored seven days or less does not improve the outcome of critically ill adults compared to the transfusion of units stored about three weeks (22.0+/-8.4 days). Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
-
5.
The Age of Blood Evaluation (ABLE) randomized controlled trial: study design
Lacroix J, Hebert P, Fergusson D, Tinmouth A, Blajchman MA, Callum J, Cook D, Marshall JC, McIntyre L, Turgeon AF
Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2011;25((3):):197-205.
Abstract
Red blood cells (RBCs) are transfused to treat anemia and to maintain oxygen delivery to vital organs during critical illness. Laboratory and observational studies have raised the possibility that prolonged RBC storage may adversely affect clinical outcomes. Compared with RBCs stored less than 1 week, there are no clinical data demonstrating that RBCs stored longer remain as effective at carrying or releasing oxygen, and observational studies have risen to possibility that prolonged RBC storage might result in harm to vulnerable patients requiring blood transfusions. The Age of Blood Evaluation(ABLE) study (ISRCTN44878718) is a double-blind, multicenter, parallel randomized controlled clinical trial. It will test the hypothesis that the transfusion of prestorage leukoreduced RBCs stored for 7 days or less (fresh arm) as compared with standard-issue RBCs stored, on average, 15 to 20 days (control arm) will lead to lower 90-day all-cause mortality and reduced morbidity in critically ill adults. We include adults in intensive care units (ICUs) who (1) have had a request for a first RBC unit transfusion during the first 7 days of ICU admission and (2) have an anticipated requirement for ongoing invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation exceeding 48 hours. Enrolled patients are randomized at the time of transfusion to receive either standard-issue RBC units or RBCs stored 7 days or less issued by the local hospital transfusion service. The primary outcome is 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include ICU and hospital mortality, organ failure, and serious nosocomial infections. With 2510 patients, we will be able to detect a 5% absolute risk reduction (from 25% to 20%). The ABLE study is currently enrolling patients in 23 university-affiliated and community-hospital ICUs across Canada; sites in France and United Kingdom are expected to start recruitment in 2011. Regardless of the results, ABLE study will have significant implications on the duration of RBC storage. A negative trial will reassure clinicians and blood bankers regarding the effectiveness and safety of standard-issue RBCs. A positive trial will have significant implications with respect to inventory management of RBCs given to critically ill adults with a high risk of mortality and will also prompt research to better understand the RBC storage lesion in the hopes of minimizing its clinical consequences through the development of better storage methods.
-
6.
The age of red blood cells in premature infants (ARIPI) randomized controlled trial: study design
Fergusson D, Hutton B, Hogan DL, LeBel L, Blajchman MA, Ford JC, Hebert P, Kakadekar A, Kovacs L, Lee S, et al
Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2009;23((1):):55-61.
Abstract
Despite recent trends in decreasing transfusion thresholds and the development of technologies designed to avoid allogeneic exposure, allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions remain an important supportive and life-saving measure for neonatal intensive care patients experiencing illness and anemia. Reluctantly, a number of laboratory and observational studies have indicated that the amount of time RBCs are stored can affect oxygen delivery to tissues. Consequently, older RBCs may result in higher rates of organ dysfunction, nosocomial infection, and lengths of stay. Because of such harmful effects, an evaluation of the association between age of blood and nosocomial infection and organ dysfunction is warranted. The aim of the study was to determine if RBCs stored for 7 days or less (fresh RBCs) compared to current standard transfusion practice decreases major nosocomial infection and organ dysfunction in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and requiring at least one RBC transfusion. This study is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial design. The trial will be an effectiveness study evaluating the effectiveness of stored vs fresh RBCs in neonates requiring transfusion. Neonatal patients requiring at least one unit of RBCs will be randomized to receive either (1) RBCs stored no longer than 7 days or (2) standard practice. The study was conducted in Canadian university-affiliated level III (tertiary) neonatal intensive care units. The primary outcome for this study will be a composite measure of major neonatal morbidities (necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and mortality). Secondary outcomes include individual items of the composite measure and nosocomial infection (bacteremia, septic shock, and pneumonia). The sample size calculations have been estimated based on the formula for 2 independent proportions using an alpha of . 05, a (1-beta) of . 80, and a 10% noncompliance factor. The baseline rate for our composite measure is estimated to be 65% as indicated by the literature. Assuming a 15% absolute risk reduction with the use of RBCs stored 7 days or less, our estimated total sample size required will be 450 (225 patients per treatment arm). The Age of Red Blood Cells in Premature Infants (ARIPI) trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials. gov) no. NCT00326924 and current controlled trials ISRCTN65939658.
-
7.
A randomized controlled trial of high and standard dose frozen plasma transfusions in critically ill patients
Tinmouth A, Chatelain E, Fergusson D, McIntyre L, Giulivi A, Hubert P
Transfusion. 2008;48((S2):):26A-27A.. Abstract No. S69-030E.
-
8.
Effect of intravenous immunoglobulins in critically ill adults with sepsis: a meta-analysis
Turgeon AF, Hutton B, Fergusson D, Hebert PC, McIntyre L, Vandenberg S
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2006;53((4)):A415-6.
-
9.
Is a restrictive transfusion strategy safe for resuscitated and critically ill trauma patients?
McIntyre L, Hebert PC, Wells G, Fergusson D, Marshall J, Yetisir E, Blajchman MJ, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
The Journal of Trauma. 2004;57((3):):563-8; discussion 568.
Abstract
BACKGROUND An analysis from the prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial (Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Trial) compared the use of restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies with resuscitated critically ill trauma patients. METHODS Critically ill trauma patients with a hemoglobin concentration less than 90 g/L within 72 hours of admission to the intensive care unit were randomized to a restrictive (hemoglobin concentration, 70 g/L) or liberal (hemoglobin concentration, 100 g/L) red blood cell transfusion strategy. RESULTS The baseline characteristics in the restrictive (n = 100) and liberal (n = 103) transfusion groups were comparable. The average hemoglobin concentrations (82. 7 +/- 6. 2 g/L vs. 104. 3 +/- 12. 2 g/L; p < 0. 0001) and the red blood cell units transfused per patient (2. 3 +/- 4. 4 vs. 5. 4 +/- 4. 3; p < 0. 0001) were significantly lower in the restrictive group than in the liberal group. The 30-day all-cause mortality rates in the restrictive group were 10%, as compared with 9% in the liberal group (p = 0. 81). The presence of multiple organ dysfunction (9. 2 +/- 6. 3 vs. 9. 0 +/- 6. 0; p = 0. 81), the changes in multiple organ dysfunction from baseline scores adjusted for death (1. 2 +/- 6. 1 vs. 1. 9 +/- 5. 7; p = 0. 44), and the length of stay in the intensive care unit (9. 8 +/- 8. 1 vs. 10. 2 +/- 8. 7 days; p = 0. 73) and hospital (31. 4 +/- 17. 1 vs. 33. 7 +/- 17. 7 days; p = 0. 34) also were similar between the restrictive and liberal transfusion groups. CONCLUSIONS A restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy appears to be safe for critically ill multiple-trauma patients. A randomized controlled trial would provide the appropriate level of evidence with regard to the daily use of blood in this population of patients.
-
10.
Effectiveness of WBC reduction in neonates: what is the evidence of benefit?
Fergusson D, Hébert PC, Barrington KJ, Shapiro SH
Transfusion. 2002;42((2):):159-165.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of WBCs in RBCs is thought to be associated with a number of significant adverse effects in recipients. In adults, WBC reduction has been shown to reduce the frequency of HLA alloimmunization, CMV and HTLV infections, and febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions. However, neonates are unique, given that they have an immature immune system and are frequently transfused with RBCs. Thus, the aims of this systematic review were to determine whether WBC reduction of RBCs transfused to neonates decreases the transmission of CMV, reduces the ability to develop HLA antibodies, or reduces the risk of immunomodulation. In addition, nosocomial infection, mortality, and duration of stay were identified and analyzed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS All studies of WBC reduction were identified by a systematic review of the literature. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were grouped based on study outcome. Where appropriate, studies were pooled to obtain an overall measure of effect. RESULTS Nine eligible studies were identified from the systematic literature search, and six were deemed evaluable. Two studies evaluated WBC reduction and the development of CMV, with different results. The pooled OR was 0.19 (95% Cl, 0.01-3.41), suggesting a clinical but nonsignificant effect. Two studies evaluated WBC reduction and HLA antibody development. As with CMV, the two studies were not congruent in their results. The pooled OR was 0.17 (95% Cl, 0.01-2.43). As for immunomodulation, two small studies presented evidence of a statistically significant change in lymphocyte subsets. No studies were identified with a primary objective of evaluating the impact of WBC reduction on nosocomial infection, mortality, or duration of stay. CONCLUSION Current evidence suggests that WBC reduction may be effective in neonates; however, further studies are needed. The lack of convincing data and the significant cost of WBC reduction mandate evaluations to determine the clinical and economic impact.