1.
Population pharmacokinetics and dosing recommendations for the use of deferiprone in children younger than 6 years of age
Bellanti F, Del Vecchio GC, Putti MC, Maggio A, Filosa A, Cosmi C, Mangiarini L, Spino M, Connelly J, Ceci A, et al
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2016;83((3):):593-602
Abstract
AIMS: Despite long clinical experience with deferiprone, there is limited information on its pharmacokinetics in children < 6 years of age. Here we assess the impact of developmental growth on the pharmacokinetics of deferiprone in this population using a population approach. Based on pharmacokinetic bridging concepts, we also evaluate whether the recommended doses yield appropriate systemic exposure in this group of patients. METHODS Data from a study in which 18 paediatric patients were enrolled were available for the purposes of this analysis. Patients were randomised to three deferiprone dose levels (8.3, 16.7 and 33.3 mg/kg). Blood samples were collected according to an optimised sampling scheme in which each patient contributed to a maximum of five samples. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM v.7.2. Model selection criteria were based on graphical and statistical summaries. RESULTS A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of deferiprone. Drug disposition parameters were affected by body weight, with both clearance and volume increasing allometrically with size. Simulation scenarios show that comparable systemic exposure (AUC) is achieved in children and adults after similar dose levels in mg/kg, with median (5-95th quantiles) AUC values respectively of 340.6 (223.2-520.0) and 318.5 (200.4-499.0) micromol/L*h at 75 mg/kg/day and 453.7 (297.3-693.0) and 424.2 (266.9-664.0) at 100 mg/kg/day t.i.d. doses. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current findings, a dosing regimen of 25 mg/kg t.i.d. is recommended in children below 6 years of age, with the possibility of titration up to 33.3 mg/kg t.i.d.
2.
Long-term use of deferiprone significantly enhances left-ventricular ejection function in thalassemia major patients
Maggio A, Vitrano A, Lucania G, Capra M, Cuccia L, Gagliardotto F, Pitrolo L, Prossomariti L, Filosa A, Caruso V, et al
American Journal of Hematology. 2012;87((7):):732-3.
Abstract
A multicenter randomized open-label long-term sequential deferiprone?deferoxamine (DFP-DFO) versus DFP alone trial (sequential DFP-DFO) performed in patients with thalassemia major (TM) was retrospectively reanalyzed to assess the variation in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [1].
3.
Chelation treatment in sickle-cell-anaemia: Much ado about nothing?
Lucania G, Vitrano A, Filosa A, Maggio A
British Journal of Haematology. 2011;154((5):):545-555.
Abstract
Blood transfusions may prevent and treat serious complications related to sickle-cell disease (SCD) when performed according to specific guidelines. However, blood transfusion requirements in SCD inevitably lead to increased body iron burden. An adequate chelation treatment may prevent complications and reduce morbidity and mortality. This review evaluates the effectiveness, safety and costs of chelation treatment. The included trials were examined according to the recommendations of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Overall, 14 trials and a total of 502 patients with SCD were included in this review. Deferoxamine alone (s.c. or i.v.), deferiprone alone or versus deferoxamine, deferasirox versus deferoxamine and combined treatment with deferoxamine plus deferiprone were included and evaluated in the analysis. Only two randomized clinical trials have been reported. The results of this analysis suggest that use of chelation treatment in SCD to date has been based on little efficacy and safety evidence, although it is widely recommended and practised. The cost/benefit ratio has not been fully explored. Further research with larger randomized clinical trials needs to be performed.
4.
Long-term sequential deferiprone-deferoxamine versus deferiprone alone for thalassaemia major patients: a randomized clinical trial
Maggio A, Vitrano A, Capra M, Cuccia L, Gagliardotto F, Filosa A, Romeo MA, Magnano C, Caruso V, Argento C, et al
British Journal of Haematology. 2009;145((2):):245-54.
Abstract
A multicentre randomized open-label trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of long-term sequential deferiprone-deferoxamine (DFO-DFP) versus DFP alone to treat thalassaemia major (TM). DFP at 75 mg/kg, divided into three oral daily doses, for 4 d/week and DFO by subcutaneous infusion (8-12 h) at 50 mg/kg per day for the remaining 3 d/week was compared with DFP alone at 75 mg/kg, administered 7 d/week during a 5-year follow-up. The main outcome measures were differences between multiple observations of serum ferritin concentrations. Secondary outcomes were survival analysis, adverse events, and costs. Consecutive thalassaemia patients (275) were assessed for eligibility; 213 of these were randomized and underwent intention-to-treat analysis. The decrease of serum ferritin levels during the treatment period was statistically significant higher in sequential DFP-DFO patients compared with DFP-alone patients (P = 0. 005). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the two chelation treatments did not show any statistically significant differences (long-rank test, P = 0. 3145). Adverse events and costs were comparable between the groups. The trial results show that sequential DFP-DFO treatment compared with DFP alone significantly decreased serum ferritin concentration during treatment for 5 years without significant differences regarding survival, adverse events, or costs.