0
selected
-
1.
A meta-analysis on the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of Grade 2 and Grade 3 diabetic foot ulcers
Yin XL, Hu L, Li T, Zou Y, Li HL
International wound journal. 2022
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
This meta-analysis aims to systemically evaluate the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). The China HowNet, China Biomedical Literature, VIP periodical resource integration service platform, Wanfang, Embase, Cochrane Central, and PubMed databases were retrieved using the computer. The retrieval period was up to July 2021. Randomised controlled trials on VSD combined with PRP in the treatment of DFU were collected. Those trials that met the inclusion criteria were included for meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 13 articles were included. In the trial group, 477 patients with DFU were treated with VSD combined with PRP, while in the control group, 482 patients with DFU were treated with conventional dressings and/or VSD. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, VSD combined with PRP has significant advantages in shortening healing time (standardised mean difference [SMD] = -0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.07 to -0.67, P < .00001), improving ulcer healing rates (odds ratio = 4.01, 95% CI: 2.95 ~ 5.46, P < .00001), and reducing hospital stays (mean difference = -15.29, 95% CI: -16.05 to -14.54, P < .00001), but the differences in dressing change times (SMD = -1.27, 95% CI: -2.71 to 0.17, P = .08) and hospitalisation expenses (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI: -13.40 to 13.07, P = .98) were not statistically significant. VSD combined with autologous PRP has good curative efficacy in the treatment of DFU and is a better treatment option. However, this treatment is limited in patients with platelet dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, leukaemia, and poor general condition.
-
2.
Risk factors for diabetic foot ulcers mortality and novel negative pressure combined with platelet-rich plasma therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
Wang Y, Liu B, Pi Y, Hu L, Yuan Y, Luo J, Tao Y, Li P, Lu S, Song W
Frontiers in pharmacology. 2022;13:1051299
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors for morbidity and mortality of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). For the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combined with platelet-rich plasma-fibrin glue (PRP) was also investigated. There were 653 patients in the diabetic foot ulcer group and 510 patients in the diabetic patients without foot ulceration (NFU) group, for a total of 1163 patients in the study samples after individuals without follow-up were excluded. The patients were randomized into two groups: the negative pressure wound therapy group and the negative pressure wound therapy combined with the PRP group. The findings of the univariate analysis revealed the blood indicators for predicting diabetic foot ulcer morbidity risk factors, such as C-reactive protein, albumin, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, procalcitonin, platelets, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, β-2-microglobulin, monocyte ratio, low-density protein cholesterol (LDL), triglyceride, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase (CK) and total cholesterol. Using logistic regression analysis revealed only albumin and age to be independent predictors of diabetic foot ulcer mortality. Our study also revealed that, compared to negative pressure wound therapy alone, negative pressure wound therapy combined with PRP accelerated wound healing and reduced the mortality rate. According to the findings of this pilot study, new risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer morbidity and mortality have been found, and negative pressure wound therapy combined with PRP therapy may provide the first information that it is an effective adjunct treatment for diabetic foot ulcers.
-
3.
Risk factors for transfusion-related acute lung injury
Hu L, Wang B, Jiang Y, Zhu B, Wang C, Yu Q, Hou W, Xia Z, Wu G, Sun Y
Respiratory care. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
Background: Until now, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) has been considered to be the leading cause of blood transfusion-related diseases and death. And there is no clinically effective treatment plan for TRALI. The aim of this study was to systematically summarize the literature on risk factors for TRALI in critical patients.Methods: Electronic searches (up to March 2020) were performed in the Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, Embase, and PubMed databases. We included studies reporting on the risk factors of TRALI for critical patients and extracted the risk factors. Finally, thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria.Results: We summarized and analyzed the potential risk factors of TRALI for critical patients in 13 existing studies. The host-related factors were age (odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] = 1.16 [1.08-1.24]), female sex (OR = 1.26 [1.16-1.38]), tobacco use status (OR = 3.82 [1.91-7.65]), chronic alcohol abuse (OR = 3.82 [2.97-26.83]), positive fluid balance (OR = 1.24 [1.08-1.42]), shock before transfusion (OR = 4.41 [2.38-8.20]), and ASA score of the recipients (OR = 2.72 [1.43-5.16]). The transfusion-related factors were the number of transfusions (OR = 1.40 [1.14-1.72]) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) units (OR = 1.21 [1.01-1.46]). The device-related factor was mechanical ventilation (OR = 4.13 [2.20-7.76]).Conclusions: The risk factors for TRALI in this study included Number of transfusions and FFP units were positively correlated with TRALI. Age, female sex, tobacco use, chronic alcohol abuse, positive fluid balance, shock before transfusion, ASA score and mechanical ventilation may be potential risk factors for TRALI. Our study suggests that host-related risk factors may play a more important role in the occurrence and development of TRALI than blood transfusion-related risk factors.
PICO Summary
Population
Critical care patients (13 studies).
Intervention
Systematic review on the risk factors for transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI).
Comparison
Outcome
The host-related factors were age, female sex, tobacco use status, chronic alcohol abuse, positive fluid balance, shock before transfusion, and ASA score of the recipients. The transfusion-related factors were the number of transfusions and fresh frozen plasma units. The device-related factor was mechanical ventilation.
-
4.
The impact of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion on prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
Xun Y, Tian H, Hu L, Yan P, Yang K, Guo T
Medicine. 2018;97((43):):e12911.
Abstract
This meta-analysis aims to clarify the clinical impacts of allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) on hepatectomy outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. A systematic literature search was performed for relevant articles in international and Chinese databases up to May 2018. Random- or fixed-effect meta-analysis was used to pool the effect estimates. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's and Peters's test. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic. The strength of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. A total of 29 studies met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis showed HCC patients in ABT group had lower survival rate at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after radical hepatectomy than those in no blood transfusion (NBT) group (RR = 0.9, 95%CI: 0.87-0.93, P < .05; RR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.77-0.89, P < .05; RR = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.65-0.74, P < .05; RR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.54-0.75, P < .05). Similar results were observed in disease-free survival (DFS) (respectively: RR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.82-0.91, P < .05; RR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.67-0.79, P < .05; RR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.64-0.79, P < .05; RR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.48-0.8, P < .05). Cancer recurrence rate was higher for the patients in ABT group at 1 and 3 years (RR = 1.5, 95%CI: 1-2.24, P < .05; RR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.09-1.49, P < .05, respectively), but not statistically significant at 5years (RR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.98-1.19, P = .512). The HCC patients in ABT group increased postoperative complications occurrence compared with those in NBT group (RR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.42-2.45, P < .05). This meta-analysis demonstrated that ABT was associated with adverse clinical outcomes for HCC patients undergoing radical hepatectomy, including poor survival, DFS, and complications. Surgeons should reduce blood loss during hepatectomy and avoid perioperative allogenic blood transfusion.