1.
Use of Novel Antithrombotic Agents for COVID-19: Systemic Summary of Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials
Talasaz AH, Sadeghipour P, Aghakouchakzadeh M, Kakavand H, Ariannejad H, Connors JM, Hunt BJ, Berger JS, Van Tassell BW, Middeldorp S, et al
Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with macro and micro thrombosis, which are triggered by endothelial cell activation, coagulopathy, and uncontrolled inflammatory response. Conventional antithrombotic agents are under assessment in dozens of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with COVID-19, with preliminary results not demonstrating benefit in several studies. OBJECTIVES Given the possibility that more novel agents with antithrombotic effects may have a potential utility for management of patients with COVID-19, we assessed ongoing RCTs including these agents with their potential mechanism of action in this population. METHODS We searched clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, to identify RCTs of novel antithrombotic agents in patients with COVID-19. RESULTS Based on a systematic literature search, 27 RCTs with 10 novel antithrombotic agents (including nafamostat, dociparstat, rNAPc2, and defibrotide) were identified. The results from these trials have not been disseminated, yet. The studied drugs in the ongoing or completed RCTs include agents affecting the coagulation cascade, drugs affecting endothelial activation, and mixed acting agents. Their postulated antithrombotic mechanisms of action and their potential impact on patient management are summarized. CONCLUSION Some novel antithrombotic agents have pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects, which may help reduce the viral load or fibrosis, and improve oxygenation. Results from ongoing RCTs will elucidate their actual role in the management of patients with COVID-19.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with COVID-19 (27 studies).
Intervention
Ten novel antithrombotic agents (including nafamostat, dociparstat, rNAPc2, and defibrotide).
Comparison
Heparin or placebo.
Outcome
The results from these trials have not been disseminated, yet. The studied drugs in the ongoing or completed randomised controlled trials include agents affecting the coagulation cascade, drugs affecting endothelial activation, and mixed acting agents.
2.
Therapeutic Anticoagulation with Heparin in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19
Goligher EC, Bradbury CA, McVerry BJ, Lawler PR, Berger JS, Gong, MN, Carrier M, Reynolds HR, Kumar A, Turgeon AF, et al
The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thrombosis and inflammation may contribute to morbidity and mortality among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). We hypothesized that therapeutic-dose anticoagulation would improve outcomes in critically ill patients with Covid-19. METHODS In an open-label, adaptive, multiplatform, randomized clinical trial, critically ill patients with severe Covid-19 were randomly assigned to a pragmatically defined regimen of either therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin or pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in accordance with local usual care. The primary outcome was organ support-free days, evaluated on an ordinal scale that combined in-hospital death (assigned a value of -1) and the number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support up to day 21 among patients who survived to hospital discharge. RESULTS The trial was stopped when the prespecified criterion for futility was met for therapeutic-dose anticoagulation. Data on the primary outcome were available for 1098 patients (534 assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and 564 assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis). The median value for organ support-free days was 1 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) among the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and was 4 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) among the patients assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis (adjusted proportional odds ratio, 0.83; 95% credible interval, 0.67 to 1.03; posterior probability of futility [defined as an odds ratio <1.2], 99.9%). The percentage of patients who survived to hospital discharge was similar in the two groups (62.7% and 64.5%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% credible interval, 0.64 to 1.11). Major bleeding occurred in 3.8% of the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and in 2.3% of those assigned to usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS In critically ill patients with Covid-19, an initial strategy of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin did not result in a greater probability of survival to hospital discharge or a greater number of days free of cardiovascular or respiratory organ support than did usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. (REMAP-CAP, ACTIV-4a, and ATTACC ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02735707, NCT04505774, NCT04359277, and NCT04372589.).
PICO Summary
Population
Critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 (n= 1,098).
Intervention
Therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin (n= 534).
Comparison
Usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (n= 564).
Outcome
The median value for organ support-free days was 1 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) among the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and was 4 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) among the patients assigned to usual-care thromboprophylaxis. The percentage of patients who survived to hospital discharge was similar in the two groups (62.7% and 64.5%, respectively). Major bleeding occurred in 3.8% of the patients assigned to therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and in 2.3% of those assigned to usual-care pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.
3.
Individualized, Intraoperative Dosing of Fibrinogen Concentrate for the Prevention of Bleeding in Neonatal and Infant Cardiac Surgery Using Cardiopulmonary Bypass (FIBCON): A Phase 1b/2a Randomized Controlled Trial
Siemens K, Hunt BJ, Harris J, Nyman AG, Parmar K, Tibby SM
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2020;:Circinterventions120009465
-
-
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mediastinal bleeding is common following pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass surgery for congenital heart disease. Fibrinogen concentrate (FC) represents a potential therapy for preventing bleeding. METHODS We performed a single-center, phase 1b/2a, randomized controlled trial on infants 2.5 to 12 kg undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, aimed at (1) demonstrating the feasibility of an intraoperative point-of-care test, rotational thromboelastometry, to screen out patients at low risk of postoperative bleeding and then guide individualized FC dosing in high-risk patients and (2) determining the dose, safety, and efficacy of intraoperative FC supplementation. Screening occurred intraoperatively 1-hour before bypass separation using the rotational thromboelastometry variable fibrinogen thromboelastometry maximum clot firmness (FibTEM-MCF; fibrinogen contribution to clot firmness). If FibTEM-MCF ≥7 mm, patients entered the monitoring cohort. If FibTEM-MCF ≤6 mm, patients were randomized to receive FC/placebo (2:1 ratio). Individualized FC dose calculation included weight, bypass circuit volume, hematocrit, and intraoperative measured and desired FibTEM-MCF. The coprimary outcomes, measured 5 minutes post-FC administration were FibTEM-MCF (desired range, 8-13 mm) and fibrinogen levels (desired range, 1.5-2.5 g/L). Secondary outcomes were thrombosis and thrombosis-related major complications and postoperative 24-hour mediastinal blood loss. RESULTS We enrolled 111 patients (cohort, n=21; FC, n=60; placebo, n=30); mean (SD) age, 6.4 months (5.8); weight, 5.9 kg (2.0). Intraoperative rotational thromboelastometry screening effectively excluded low-risk patients, in that none in the cohort arm (FibTEM-MCF, ≥7 mm) demonstrated clinically significant early postoperative bleeding (>10 mL/kg per 4 hours). Among randomized patients, the median (range) FC administered dose was 114 mg/kg (51-218). Fibrinogen levels increased from a mean (SD) of 0.91 (0.22) to 1.7 g/L (0.41). The postdose fibrinogen range was 1.2 to 3.3 g/L (72% within the desired range). The corresponding FibTEM-MCF values were as follows: pre-dose, 5.3 mm (1.9); post-dose, 13 mm (3.2). Ten patients (8 FC and 2 placebo) exhibited 12 possible thromboses; none were clearly related to FC. There was an overall difference in mean (SD) 24-hour mediastinal drain loss: cohort, 12.6 mL/kg (6.4); FC, 11.6 mL/kg (5.2); placebo, 17.1 mL/kg (14.3; ANOVA P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative, individualized dosing of FC appears feasible. The need for individualized dosing is supported by the finding that a 4-fold variation in FC dose is required to achieve therapeutic fibrinogen levels. Registration: URL: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/; Unique identifier: 2013-003532-68. URL: https://www.isrctn.com/; Unique identifier: 50553029.
PICO Summary
Population
Infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (n= 111).
Intervention
Fibrinogen concentrate (FC), (n= 60).
Comparison
Placebo (n= 30).
Outcome
Among randomized patients, the median (range) FC administered dose was 114 mg/kg (51-218). Fibrinogen levels increased from a mean (SD) of 0.91 (0.22) to 1.7 g/L (0.41). The postdose fibrinogen range was 1.2 to 3.3 g/L (72% within the desired range). The corresponding FibTEM-MCF values were as follows: pre-dose, 5.3 mm (1.9); post-dose, 13 mm (3.2). Ten patients (8 FC and 2 placebo) exhibited 12 possible thromboses; none were clearly related to FC. There was an overall difference in mean (SD) 24-hour mediastinal drain loss: cohort, 12.6 mL/kg (6.4); FC, 11.6 mL/kg (5.2); placebo, 17.1 mL/kg (14.3).