1.
Outcomes of Patients With Acute Limb Ischemia in Patients With COVID-19: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
Jain A, Reddy A, Murugesan R, Dutta S, Kumbhar U, Savlania A, Vaka SK
Cureus. 2022;14(7):e27370
Abstract
A systemic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in patients with and without coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) to determine the outcomes of ALI and compare the outcomes in patients with and without COVID-19 infection. A literature search of the Medline, Science Direct and Cochrane Library was performed from inception to July 15, 2021. Studies involving ALI in patients with COVID-19 were searched through three electronic databases. The endpoints include limb salvage, re-thrombosis, and mortality, and these outcomes were compared between patients with and without COVID-19 infection and type of management. The primary outcome was early limb salvage (till the patient was discharged from the hospital). The other outcomes assessed were re-thrombosis and mortality. These outcomes were compared between patients with and without COVID-19 infection and the type of management. Pooled estimates were presented as odds ratios (ORs) using a random or fixed effect model based on the results of the chi-square test and calculation of I(2). Comparing the ALI outcomes in patients with and without COVID-19 infection, there was no significant difference in limb salvage rate (OR=0.26, 95% CI:0.02-3.09), but there was a significantly higher re-thrombosis (OR=2.65, 95% CI:1.34-5.23) and mortality rate (OR=4.71, 95% CI:1.11-19.99) in patients with COVID-19 infection. On comparing outcomes based on management, intervention group, and anticoagulant alone group, no significant difference was noted concerning limb salvage (OR=1.40, 95% CI:0.27-7.13) and mortality rates (OR=0.2, 95% CI:0.04-1.07). This meta-analysis demonstrates a higher re-thrombosis and mortality in ALI patients with COVID-19 infection when compared to patients without COVID-19 but with similar limb salvage.
2.
Combining Platelet-Rich Plasma Instillation With Core Decompression Improves Functional Outcome and Delays Progression in Early-Stage Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head: a 4.5- to 6-Year Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
Aggarwal AK, Poornalingam K, Jain A, Prakash M
J Arthroplasty. 2020
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avascular necrosis of femoral head is a debilitating disease frequently progressing to femoral head collapse and joint destruction. The efficacy of core decompression (CD) remains controversial. METHODS About 40 consecutive age-matched and gender-matched patients (53 hips) were randomized into 2 groups by computer-generated algorithm table in a prospective randomized double-blinded comparative study. Group A (platelet-rich plasma [PRP] with CD) included 19 patients (25 hips), and group B (CD only) included 21 patients (28 hips). Postoperative Harris Hip Score and magnetic resonance imaging to quantify the necrotic area by using modified Kerboul angle were done and evaluated. Mean follow-up was 64.3 months (range, 54-72) and 63.7 months (range, 56-72) in groups A and B, respectively. RESULTS There was statistically significant difference between PRP and control groups in pain score (P = .00), functional score (P = .02), and Harris Hip Score (P = .00) at final follow-up. There was no progression in stage 1 disease. Stage 2 disease showed 24% progression in group A and 43% progression in group B. The difference was statistically significant (P = .025). Survivorship from femoral head collapse, any procedure, and total hip arthroplasty was 84%/68% (P = .00), 76%/57% (P = .02), and 92%/78% (P = .01) in 2 groups, which was statistically significant. CONCLUSION PRP use after CD provides significant pain relief, better midterm functional outcome, retards the progression, and enhances the survivorship free from reoperation for hip arthroplasty and femoral head collapse in early stages of avascular necrosis of hip than CD alone.
3.
[Effectiveness of platelet rich plasma in pain management of osteoarthritis knee: Double blind, randomized comparative study]
Ghai B, Gupta V, Jain A, Goel N, Chouhan D, Batra YK
Revista brasileira de anestesiologia. 2019
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma to treat symptoms of knee osteoarthritis have been successfully used in young patients. However in most of these studies the control and test knees were present in different patients thus incorporating a large amount of bias in the results. Therefore, the present study was designed in which patients with bilateral osteoarthritis knee were included and platelet-rich plasma was administered in one knee and normal saline in another knee of same patient. METHODS 20 patients aged 30-65years with bilateral osteoarthritis knees (ASA class I and II) of either gender were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive platelet-rich plasma and normal saline in one of the two knees. The primary outcome was VAS and WOMAC score at 6months after procedure. The secondary outcome included changes in joint stiffness, physical function, any adverse effects noted during the course of study. RESULTS The baseline VAS score in platelet-rich plasma knee was 8.4 +/- 0.88 which improved significantly to 4.85 +/- 2.48 (p < 0.001) at 6months as compared to normal saline knee (p = 0.017). The WOMAC pain score also improved from baseline (14.5 +/- 1.3) to over 6month 7.00 +/- 4.24 (p < 0.001) in platelet-rich plasma knee while in the normal saline knee, no significant change occurred from baseline to six months (10.2 +/- 1.2 to 10.05 +/- 1.23). There was also significant decrease in stiffness and improvement of physical activity in the platelet-rich plasma knee as compared to normal saline knee. CONCLUSION The present study showed significant decrease in pain and stiffness and improvement of physical functions of knee joint with intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injection as compared to normal saline.
4.
Treatment with platelet-rich plasma is more effective than placebo for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial
Patel S, Dhillon MS, Aggarwal S, Marwaha N, Jain A
American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013;41((2):):356-64.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specific growth factors have been proposed as therapeutic proteins for cartilage repair. HYPOTHESIS Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) provides symptomatic relief in early osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. STUDY DESIGN Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS A total of 78 patients (156 knees) with bilateral OA were divided randomly into 3 groups. Group A (52 knees) received a single injection of PRP, group B (50 knees) received 2 injections of PRP 3 weeks apart, and group C (46 knees) received a single injection of normal saline. White blood cell (WBC)-filtered PRP with a platelet count 3 times that of baseline (PRP type 4B) was administered in all. All the groups were homogeneous and comparable in baseline characteristics. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire before treatment and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. They were also evaluated for pain by a visual analog scale, and overall satisfaction with the procedure and complications were noted. RESULTS Statistically significant improvement in all WOMAC parameters was noted in groups A and B within 2 to 3 weeks and lasting until the final follow-up at 6 months, with slight worsening at the 6-month follow-up. The mean WOMAC scores (pain, stiffness, physical function, and total score) for group A at baseline were 10.18, 3.12, 36.56, and 49.86, respectively, and at final follow-up were 5.00, 2.10, 20.08, and 27.18, respectively, showing significant improvement. Similar improvement was noted in group B (mean WOMAC scores at baseline: 10.62, 3.50, 39.10, and 53.20, respectively; mean WOMAC scores at final follow-up: 6.18, 1.88, 22.40, and 30.48, respectively). In group C, the mean WOMAC scores deteriorated from baseline (9.04, 2.70, 33.80, and 45.54, respectively) to final follow-up (10.87, 2.76, 39.46, and 53.09, respectively). The 3 groups were compared with each other, and no improvement was noted in group C as compared with groups A and B (P < .001). There was no difference between groups A and B, and there was no influence of age, sex, weight, or body mass index on the outcome. Knees with Ahlback grade 1 fared better than those with grade 2. Mild complications such as nausea and dizziness, which were of short duration, were observed in 6 patients (22.2%) in group A and 11 patients (44%) in group B. CONCLUSION A single dose of WBC-filtered PRP in concentrations of 10 times the normal amount is as effective as 2 injections to alleviate symptoms in early knee OA. The results, however, deteriorate after 6 months. Both groups treated with PRP had better results than did the group injected with saline only.