1.
Regular bleeding risk assessment associated with reduction in bleeding outcomes: The mAFA II randomised trial
Guo Y, Lane DA, Chen Y, Lip GYH
Am J Med. 2020
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mobile Atrial fibrillation application (mAFA-II) randomised trial reported that a holistic management strategy supported by mobile Health reduced atrial fibrillation-related adverse outcomes. The present study aimed to assess whether regular reassessment of bleeding risk using the HAS-BLED score would improve bleeding outcomes and anticoagulant (OAC) uptake. METHODS Bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score) was monitored prospectively using mAFA, and calculated as 30 days, Days 31-60, Days 61-180, and Days 181-365. Clinical events and OAC changes in relation to the dynamic monitoring were analysed. RESULTS We studied 1793 patients with atrial fibrillation (mean, standard deviation, age 64, 24 years, 32.5% female). Comparing baseline and 12 months, the proportion of atrial fibrillation patients with HAS-BLED ≥3 decreased (11.8% vs. 8.5%, p=0.008), with changes in use of concomitant NSAIDs/antiplatelets, renal dysfunction, and labile international normalized ratio contributing to the decreased proportions of patients with HAS-BLED ≥3 (p<0.05). Among 1077 (60%) patients who had four bleeding risk assessments, incident bleeding events decreased significantly from Days 1-30, to Days 181-365 (1.2% to 0.2%, respectively, p<0.001). Total OAC usage increased from 63.4% to 70.2% (ptrend<0.001). Compared to atrial fibrillation patients receiving usual care (n=1136), bleeding events were significantly lower in atrial fibrillaiton patients with dynamic monitoring of their bleeding risk (mAFA vs usual care, 2.1%, 4.3%, p=0.004). (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Dynamic risk monitoring using the HAS-BLED score, together with holistic App-based management using mAFA II reduced bleeding events, addressed modifiable bleeding risks and increased uptake of OACs.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation enrolled in the mAFA-II trial (n=1793).
Intervention
Dynamic risk monitoring on anticoagulant and bleeding events using the HAS-BLED score at four timepoints (n=1077).
Comparison
Usual care (n=1136).
Outcome
Comparing baseline and 12 months, the proportion of atrial fibrillation patients with HAS-BLED >/=3 decreased (11.8% vs. 8.5%), with changes in use of concomitant NSAIDs/antiplatelets, renal dysfunction, and labile international normalized ratio contributing to the decreased proportions of patients with HAS-BLED >/=3. Among 1077 (60%) patients who had four bleeding risk assessments, incident bleeding events decreased significantly from Days 1-30, to Days 181-365 (1.2% to 0.2%, respectively). Total OAC usage increased from 63.4% to 70.2%. Compared to atrial fibrillation patients receiving usual care (n=1136), bleeding events were significantly lower in atrial fibrillation patients with dynamic monitoring of their bleeding risk (mAFA vs usual care, 2.1%, 4.3%).
2.
Association of International Normalized Ratio Stability and Bleeding Outcomes Among Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Kerneis M, Yee MK, Mehran R, Nafee T, Bode C, Halperin JL, Peterson ED, Verheugt FWA, Wildgoose P, van Eickels M, et al
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2019;12(2):e007124
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention enrolled in PIONEER AF-PCI (An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study Exploring Two Treatment Strategies of Rivaroxaban and a Dose-Adjusted Oral Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment Strategy in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), it is unclear if the observed reduction in bleeding events with rivaroxaban regimens is consistent across a range of the international normalized ratio (INR) among subjects administrated Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-triple therapy. This analysis compares the occurrence of clinically significant bleeding between rivaroxaban and VKA strategies, according to INR stability of subjects administrated VKA. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 2124 atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to 3 groups: rivaroxaban 15 mg od plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (group 1, n=709); rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bid plus dual antiplatelet therapy (group 2, n=709); and warfarin plus dual antiplatelet therapy (group 3, n=706). Subjects assigned to the VKA group were stratified according to time in therapeutic range and time spent with an INR >3. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for clinically significant bleeding through 1 year and hazard ratios were derived using Cox Proportional Hazards models. Among group 3, 93.4% of the participants had a time in therapeutic range available (mean time in therapeutic range=65.0+/-24.8%). Both groups 1 and 2 were associated with a reduction in clinically significant bleeding compared with subjects in group 3, regardless of the time in therapeutic range (hazard ratio ranges=0.53-0.71 and 0.57-0.76; respectively, P<0.05 for all). Rivaroxaban strategies were associated with a reduction in clinically significant bleeding compared with VKA regardless of the proportion of time spent with an INR >3 (hazard ratio ranges=0.59-0.67 and 0.42-0.69; P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS Among atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, rivaroxaban-based therapy was superior to warfarin plus dual antiplatelet therapy in lowering bleeding outcomes regardless of the INR stability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01830543.