1.
International guidelines regarding the role of IVIG in the management of Rh- and ABO-mediated haemolytic disease of the newborn
Lieberman L, Lopriore E, Baker JM, Bercovitz RS, Christensen RD, Crighton G, Delaney M, Goel R, Hendrickson JE, Keir A, et al
British journal of haematology. 2022
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) can be associated with significant morbidity. Prompt treatment with intensive phototherapy (PT) and exchange transfusions (ETs) can dramatically improve outcomes. ET is invasive and associated with risks. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be an alternative therapy to prevent use of ET. An international panel of experts was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations regarding the effectiveness and safety of IVIG to reduce the need for ETs, improve neurocognitive outcomes, reduce bilirubin level, reduce the frequency of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and severity of anaemia, and/or reduce duration of hospitalization for neonates with Rh or ABO-mediated HDN. We used a systematic approach to search and review the literature and then develop recommendations from published data. These recommendations conclude that IVIG should not be routinely used to treat Rh or ABO antibody-mediated HDN. In situations where hyperbilirubinaemia is severe (and ET is imminent), or when ET is not readily available, the role of IVIG is unclear. High-quality studies are urgently needed to assess the optimal use of IVIG in patients with HDN.
2.
Effects of Liberal vs Restrictive Transfusion Thresholds on Survival and Neurocognitive Outcomes in Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants: The ETTNO Randomized Clinical Trial
Franz AR, Engel C, Bassler D, Rüdiger M, Thome UH, Maier RF, Krägeloh-Mann I, Kron M, Essers J, Bührer C, et al
Jama. 2020;324(6):560-570
-
-
-
Free full text
-
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Red blood cell transfusions are commonly administered to infants weighing less than 1000 g at birth. Evidence-based transfusion thresholds have not been established. Previous studies have suggested higher rates of cognitive impairment with restrictive transfusion thresholds. OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of liberal vs restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies on death or disability. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial conducted in 36 level III/IV neonatal intensive care units in Europe among 1013 infants with birth weights of 400 g to 999 g at less than 72 hours after birth; enrollment took place between July 14, 2011, and November 14, 2014, and follow-up was completed by January 15, 2018. INTERVENTIONS Infants were randomly assigned to liberal (n = 492) or restrictive (n = 521) red blood cell transfusion thresholds based on infants' postnatal age and current health state. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The primary outcome, measured at 24 months of corrected age, was death or disability, defined as any of cognitive deficit, cerebral palsy, or severe visual or hearing impairment. Secondary outcome measures included individual components of the primary outcome, complications of prematurity, and growth. RESULTS Among 1013 patients randomized (median gestational age at birth, 26.3 [interquartile range {IQR}, 24.9-27.6] weeks; 509 [50.2%] females), 928 (91.6%) completed the trial. Among infants in the liberal vs restrictive transfusion thresholds groups, respectively, incidence of any transfusion was 400/492 (81.3%) vs 315/521 (60.5%); median volume transfused was 40 mL (IQR, 16-73 mL) vs 19 mL (IQR, 0-46 mL); and weekly mean hematocrit was 3 percentage points higher with liberal thresholds. Among infants in the liberal vs restrictive thresholds groups, the primary outcome occurred in 200/450 (44.4%) vs 205/478 (42.9%), respectively, for a difference of 1.6% (95% CI, -4.8% to 7.9%; P = .72). Death by 24 months occurred in 38/460 (8.3%) vs 44/491 (9.0%), for a difference of -0.7% (95% CI, -4.3% to 2.9%; P = .70), cognitive deficit was observed in 154/410 (37.6%) vs 148/430 (34.4%), for a difference of 3.2% (95% CI, -3.3% to 9.6%; P = .47), and cerebral palsy occurred in 18/419 (4.3%) vs 25/443 (5.6%), for a difference of -1.3% (95% CI, -4.2% to 1.5%; P = .37), in the liberal vs the restrictive thresholds groups, respectively. In the liberal vs restrictive thresholds groups, necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgical intervention occurred in 20/492 (4.1%) vs 28/518 (5.4%); bronchopulmonary dysplasia occurred in 130/458 (28.4%) vs 126/485 (26.0%); and treatment for retinopathy of prematurity was required in 41/472 (8.7%) vs 38/492 (7.7%). Growth at follow-up was also not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among infants with birth weights of less than 1000 g, a strategy of liberal blood transfusions compared with restrictive transfusions did not reduce the likelihood of death or disability at 24 months of corrected age. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01393496.
PICO Summary
Population
Extremely low-birth-weight infants from 36 European centres enrolled in the ETTNO trial (n= 1,013).
Intervention
Liberal red blood cell transfusion threshold (n= 492).
Comparison
Restrictive red blood cell transfusion threshold (n= 521).
Outcome
Among infants in the liberal vs restrictive transfusion thresholds groups, respectively, incidence of any transfusion was 81.3% vs. 60.5%; median volume transfused was 40 mL vs. 19 mL; and weekly mean haematocrit was 3 percentage points higher with liberal thresholds. Among infants in the liberal vs restrictive thresholds groups, the primary outcome occurred in 44.4% vs. 42.9%, respectively, for a difference of 1.6%. Death by 24 months occurred in 8.3% vs. 9.0%, for a difference of -0.7%, cognitive deficit was observed in 37.6% vs. 34.4%, for a difference of 3.2%, and cerebral palsy occurred in 4.3% vs. 5.6%, for a difference of -1.3%, in the liberal vs the restrictive thresholds groups, respectively. In the liberal vs. restrictive thresholds groups, necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgical intervention occurred in 4.1% vs. 5.4%; bronchopulmonary dysplasia occurred in 28.4% vs. 26.0%; and treatment for retinopathy of prematurity was required in 8.7% vs. 7.7%. Growth at follow-up was also not significantly different between groups.
3.
The effect of epoetin beta (recombinant human erythropoietin) on the need for transfusion in very-low-birth-weight infants. European Multicentre Erythropoietin Study Group
Maier RF, Obladen M, Scigalla P, Linderkamp O, Duc G, Hieronimi G, Halliday HL, Versmold HT, Moriette G, Jorch G,, et al
New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;330((17):):1173-8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anemia of prematurity is characterized by low reticulocyte counts and inadequate erythropoietin response, for which many very-low-birth-weight infants receive multiple blood transfusions. We investigated whether early treatment of such infants with recombinant human erythropoietin would reduce their need for transfusions. METHODS We performed a controlled, blinded trial in 241 infants with very low birth weights at 12 centers in six European countries. When three days old, the infants were randomly assigned either to the epoetin group or to the control group. Those in the epoetin group received 250 IU of epoetin beta per kilogram of body weight subcutaneously three times a week from day 3 to day 42 (for a total of 17 doses); those in the control group did not receive this drug. Infants in both groups received oral iron (2 mg per day) from day 14 onward. RESULTS The control infants needed a mean of 1.25 transfusions each, as compared with 0.87 transfusion for epoetin-treated infants (P = 0.013). The median cumulative volume of blood transfused per kilogram per day was 0.41 ml in the control group (first quartile, 0 ml; third quartile, 0.8 ml) and 0.09 ml in the epoetin group (first quartile, 0 ml; third quartile, 0.8 ml) (P = 0.044). The rate of success, defined as an absence of need for transfusions and a hematocrit that never fell below 32 percent, was 4.1 percent in the control group and 27.5 percent in the epoetin group (P = 0.008). Epoetin was most beneficial in boys with birth weights of 1200 g or more and a base-line hematocrit of 48 percent or more. No toxic effects were observed in the epoetin group; as compared with the control group, the epoetin group had an increased incidence of septicemia (14 vs. 7 episodes, P not significant) and reduced weight gain (520 vs. 571 g, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Infants with very low birth weights have less need of transfusions if given epoetin beta during the first six weeks of life (250 IU per kilogram three times a week). We recommend early epoetin treatment for all such infants, but further studies of nutrition and iron supplementation during treatment are needed.