1.
Comparison of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate With Frozen Plasma for Management of Hemorrhage During and After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Pilot Trial
Karkouti K, Bartoszko J, Grewal D, Bingley C, Armali C, Carroll J, Hucke HP, Kron A, McCluskey SA, Rao V, et al
JAMA network open. 2021;4(4):e213936
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Approximately 15% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery receive frozen plasma (FP) for bleeding. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) have logistical and safety advantages over FP and may be a suitable alternative. OBJECTIVES To determine the proportion of patients who received PCC and then required FP, explore hemostatic effects and safety, and assess the feasibility of study procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Parallel-group randomized pilot study conducted at 2 Canadian hospitals. Adult patients requiring coagulation factor replacement for bleeding during cardiac surgery (from September 23, 2019, to June 19, 2020; final 28-day follow-up visit, July 17, 2020). Data analysis was initiated on September 15, 2020. INTERVENTIONS Prothrombin complex concentrate (1500 IU for patients weighing ≤60 kg and 2000 IU for patients weighing >60 kg) or FP (3 U for patients weighing ≤60 kg and 4 U for patients weighing >60 kg), repeated once as needed within 24 hours (FP used for any subsequent doses in both groups). Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Hemostatic effectiveness (whether patients received any hemostatic therapies from 60 minutes to 4 and 24 hours after initiation of the intervention, amount of allogeneic blood components administered within 24 hours after start of surgery, and avoidance of red cell transfusions within 24 hours after start of surgery), protocol adherence, and adverse events. The analysis set comprised all randomized patients who had undergone cardiac surgery, received at least 1 dose of either treatment, and provided informed consent after surgery. RESULTS Of 169 screened patients, 131 were randomized, and 101 were treated (54 with PCC and 47 with FP), provided consent, and were included in the analysis (median age, 64 years; interquartile range [IQR], 54-73 years; 28 [28%] were female; 82 [81%] underwent complex operations). The PCC group received a median 24.9 IU/kg (IQR, 21.8-27.0 IU/kg) of PCC (2 patients [3.7%; 95% CI, 0.4%-12.7%] required FP). The FP group received a median 12.5 mL/kg (IQR, 10.0-15.0 mL/kg) of FP (4 patients [8.5%; 95% CI, 2.4%-20.4%] required >2 doses of FP). Hemostatic therapy was not required at the 4-hour time point for 43 patients (80%) in the PCC group and for 32 patients (68%) in the FP group (P = .25) nor at the 24-hour time point for 41 patients (76%) in the PCC group and for 31 patients (66%) patients in the FP group (P = .28). The median numbers of units for 24-hour cumulative allogeneic transfusions (red blood cells, platelets, and FP) were 6.0 U (IQR, 4.0-11.0 U) in the PCC group and 14.0 U (IQR, 8.0-20.0 U) in the FP group (ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77; P < .001). After exclusion of FP administered as part of the investigational medicinal product, the median numbers of units were 6.0 U (IQR, 4.0-11.0 U) in the PCC group and 10.0 U (IQR, 6.0-16.0 U) in the FP group (ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59-1.08; P = .15). For red blood cells alone, the median numbers were 1.5 U (IQR, 0.0-4.0 U) in the PCC group and 3.0 U (IQR, 1.0-5.0 U) in the FP group (ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99; P = .05). During the first 24 hours after start of surgery, 15 patients in the PCC group (28%) and 8 patients in the FP group (17%) received no red blood cells (P = .24). Adverse event profiles were similar. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This randomized clinical trial found that the study protocols were feasible. Adequately powered randomized clinical trials are warranted to determine whether PCC is a suitable substitute for FP for mitigation of bleeding in cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04114643.
PICO Summary
Population
Cardiac surgery patients (n= 101).
Intervention
Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC group, n= 54).
Comparison
Frozen plasma (FP group, n= 47).
Outcome
Haemostatic therapy was not required at the 4-hour time point for 43 patients (80%) in the PCC group and for 32 patients (68%) in the FP group, nor at the 24-hour time point for 41 patients (76%) in the PCC group and for 31 patients (66%) patients in the FP group. The median numbers of units for 24-hour cumulative allogeneic transfusions (red blood cells, platelets, and FP) were 6.0 U in the PCC group and 14.0 U in the FP group. After exclusion of FP administered as part of the investigational medicinal product, the median numbers of units were 6.0 U in the PCC group and 10.0 U in the FP group. For red blood cells alone, the median numbers were 1.5 U in the PCC group and 3.0 U in the FP group. During the first 24 hours after start of surgery, 15 patients in the PCC group (28%) and 8 patients in the FP group (17%) received no red blood cells. Adverse event profiles were similar.
2.
Effect of Fibrinogen Concentrate vs Cryoprecipitate on Blood Component Transfusion After Cardiac Surgery: The FIBRES Randomized Clinical Trial
Callum J, Farkouh ME, Scales DC, Heddle NM, Crowther M, Rao V, Hucke HP, Carroll J, Grewal D, Brar S, et al
Jama. 2019;:1-11
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Importance: Excessive bleeding is a common complication of cardiac surgery. An important cause of bleeding is acquired hypofibrinogenemia (fibrinogen level <1.5-2.0 g/L), for which guidelines recommend fibrinogen replacement with cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate. The 2 products have important differences, but comparative clinical data are lacking. Objective: To determine if fibrinogen concentrate is noninferior to cryoprecipitate for treatment of bleeding related to hypofibrinogenemia after cardiac surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial at 11 Canadian hospitals enrolling adult patients experiencing clinically significant bleeding and hypofibrinogenemia after cardiac surgery (from February 10, 2017, to November 1, 2018). Final 28-day follow-up visit was completed on November 28, 2018. Interventions: Fibrinogen concentrate (4 g; n = 415) or cryoprecipitate (10 units; n = 412) for each ordered dose within 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was blood components (red blood cells, platelets, plasma) administered during 24 hours post bypass. A 2-sample, 1-sided test for the ratio of the mean number of units was conducted to evaluate noninferiority (threshold for noninferiority ratio, <1.2). Results: Of 827 randomized patients, 735 (372 fibrinogen concentrate, 363 cryoprecipitate) were treated and included in the primary analysis (median age, 64 [interquartile range, 53-72] years; 30% women; 72% underwent complex operations; 95% moderate to severe bleeding; and pretreatment fibrinogen level, 1.6 [interquartile range, 1.3-1.9] g/L). The trial met the a priori stopping criterion for noninferiority at the interim analysis after 827 of planned 1200 patients were randomized. Mean 24-hour postbypass allogeneic transfusions were 16.3 (95% CI, 14.9 to 17.8) units in the fibrinogen concentrate group and 17.0 (95% CI, 15.6 to 18.6) units in the cryoprecipitate group (ratio, 0.96 [1-sided 97.5% CI, -infinity to 1.09; P < .001 for noninferiority] [2-sided 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.09; P = .50 for superiority]). Thromboembolic events occurred in 26 patients (7.0%) in the fibrinogen concentrate group and 35 patients (9.6%) in the cryoprecipitate group. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who develop clinically significant bleeding and hypofibrinogenemia after cardiopulmonary bypass, fibrinogen concentrate is noninferior to cryoprecipitate with regard to number of blood components transfused in a 24-hour period post bypass. Use of fibrinogen concentrate may be considered for management of bleeding in patients with acquired hypofibrinogenemia in cardiac surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03037424.
3.
Point-of-care hemostatic testing in cardiac surgery: a stepped-wedge clustered randomized controlled trial
Karkouti K, Callum J, Wijeysundera DN, Rao V, Crowther M, Grocott HP, Pinto R, Scales DC
Circulation. 2016;134((16):):1152-1162
Abstract
BACKGROUND -Cardiac surgery is frequently complicated by coagulopathic bleeding that is difficult to optimally manage using standard hemostatic testing. We hypothesized that point-of-care hemostatic testing within the context of an integrated transfusion algorithm would improve the management of coagulopathy in cardiac surgery and thereby reduce blood transfusions. METHODS -We conducted a pragmatic multi-centered stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial of a POC-based transfusion algorithm in consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at 12 hospitals from Oct 6, 2014 to May 1, 2015. Following a 1-month data collection at all participating hospitals, a transfusion algorithm incorporating point-of-care hemostatic testing was sequentially implemented at 2 hospitals at a time in 1-month intervals, with the implementation order randomly assigned. No other aspects of care were modified. The primary outcome was red cell transfusion from surgery to postoperative day seven. Other outcomes included transfusion of other blood products, major bleeding, and major complications. The analysis adjusted for secular time-trends, within-hospital clustering, and patient-level risk factors. All outcomes and analyses were pre-specified before study initiation. RESULTS -Among the 7402 patients studied, 3555 underwent surgery during the control phase and 3847 during the intervention phase. Overall, 3329 (45.0%) received red cells, 1863 (25.2%) received platelets, 1645 (22.2%) received plasma, and 394 (5.3%) received cryoprecipitate. Major bleeding occurred in 1773 (24.1%) patients and major complications occurred in 740 (10.2%) patients. The trial intervention reduced rates of red cell transfusion (adjusted relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98; P = 0.02; Number needed to treat [NNT] 24.7), platelet transfusion (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.87; P < 0.001; NNT 16.7), and major bleeding (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94; P = 0.004; NNT 22.6), but had no effect on other blood product transfusions or major complications. CONCLUSIONS -Implementation of point-of-care hemostatic testing within the context of an integrated transfusion algorithm reduces red cell transfusions, platelet transfusions, and major bleeding following cardiac surgery. Our findings support the broader adoption of point-of-care hemostatic testing into clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02200419.
4.
Aprotinin and dipyridamole for the safe reduction of postoperative blood loss
Cohen G, Ivanov J, Weisel RD, Rao V, Mohabeer MK, Mickle DA
Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1998;65((3):):674-83.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aprotinin (APR) reduces postoperative blood loss but may induce thrombosis. Dipyridamole (DIP) limits platelet aggregation and may reduce the thrombotic complications associated with APR. METHODS To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of combined APR and DIP, we undertook a prospective randomized trial in patients undergoing cardiac operations. Patients were stratified according to risk for bleeding (low or high), and received either DIP with placebo (DIP group; n = 59) or DIP with APR (DIP + APR group; n = 56). Blood samples were obtained for the measurement of hematologic and biochemical parameters. Blood loss and transfusion requirements were documented postoperatively. RESULTS Postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were significantly lower in the DIP + APR group at 6, 12, and 24 hours after bypass (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found between groups in the incidence of perioperative mortality (DIP, 0%; DIP + APR, 3%), myocardial infarction (DIP, 0%; DIP + APR, 3%), stroke (DIP, 1%; DIP + APR, 1%), or potential thrombotic events (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke: DIP, 2%; DIP + APR, 5%). In addition, these rates did not differ from those of nonparticipating matched control patients. CONCLUSIONS Administration of both drugs simultaneously was more effective than DIP alone in reducing postoperative blood loss. A platelet inhibitor may be required to reduce the thrombotic complications associated with APR. Further studies evaluating graft patency and perioperative ischemia are necessary to confirm the potential benefits of the combination of a platelet inhibitor and APR.