1.
Prognostic of red blood cell transfusion during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy on mortality: A meta-analysis
Li Y, Wang J, Li C, Wang L, Chen Y
Perfusion. 2023;:2676591231157234
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis aimed to explore the impact of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on mortality during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Previous studies investigated the prognostic impact of RBC transfusion during ECMO on the risk of mortality, but no meta-analysis has been published before. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched for papers published up to 13 December 2021, using the MeSH terms "ECMO", "'Erythrocytes", and "Mortality" to identify meta-analyses. Total or daily RBC transfusion during ECMO and mortality were examined. RESULTS The random-effect model was used. Eight studies (794 patients, including 354 dead) were included. The total volume of RBC was associated with higher mortality standardized weighted difference (SWD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.06,-0.18, p = .006; I2 = 79.7%, P(heterogeneity) = 0.001). The daily volume of RBC was associated with higher mortality (SWD = -0.77, 95% CI: -1.11,-0.42, p < .001; I2 = 65.7%, P(heterogeneity) = 0.020). The total volume of RBC was associated with mortality for venovenous (VV) (SWD = -0.72, 95% CI: -1.23, -0.20, p = .006) but not venoarterial ECMO (p = .126) or when reported together (p = .089). The daily volume of RBC was associated with mortality for VV (SWD = -0.72, 95% CI: -1.18, -0.26, p = 0.002; I2 = 0.0%, P(heterogeneity) = 0.642) and venoarterial (SWD = -0.95, 95% CI: -1.32, -0.57, p < .001) ECMO, but not when reported together (p = .067). The sensitivity analysis suggested the robustness of the results. CONCLUSION When considering the total and daily volumes of RBC transfusion during ECMO, the patients who survived received smaller total and daily volumes of RBC transfusion. This meta-analysis suggests that RBC transfusion might be associated with a higher risk of mortality during ECMO.
2.
Effect of continuous plasma filtration adsorption on treatment of severely burned patients with sepsis
Lyu T, Wang L, Liu B, Lou JH, Li XL, Li YC, Li SR
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi = Zhonghua Shaoshang Zazhi = Chinese Journal of Burns. 2018;34((6)):370-373.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate effect of continuous plasma filtration adsorption on treatment of severely burned patients with sepsis. Methods: In January 2014 to September 2017, 86 severely burned patients with sepsis, conforming to the study criteria, were admitted to our hospital and divided into into routine treatment group and continuous plasma filtration group according to the random number table method, with 43 patients in each group. Patients in routine treatment group were treated with routine treatment after admission. Patients in continuous plasma filtration group were treated with blood filter, blood purification machine, and plasma separator for continuous plasma filtration adsorption on the basis of the routine treatment group on the second day after admission. The course of treatment in the 2 groups was 7 d. The total effective treatment rate, changes of leukocyte count (WBC), usea nitrogen, serum creatinine, neutrophile CD64, procalcitonin, and C reactive protein (CRP) before and after treatment, and mortality on 28 days after treatment of patients in 2 groups were analyzed and compared. Results: (1) The total effective treatment rate of patients in continuous plasma filtration group was 88.37% (38/43), which was significantly higher than that of the routine treatment group [65.12% (28/43), chi(2)=6.515, P=0.018]. (2) After treatment, WBC, urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, neutrophils CD64, procalcitonin, and CRP of patients in continuous plasma filtration group were significantly lower those in routine treatment group (t=6.305, 4.420, 18.537, 13.435, 12.975, 14.234, P<0.05). WBC, urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, neutrophile CD64, procalcitonin, and CRP of patients in 2 groups after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment (t=9.459, 9.130, 25.438, 35.467, 23.471, 23.601, 3.802, 5.662, 12.067, 25.694, 20.720, 12.437, P<0.05). (3) On 28 days after treatment, mortality of patients in continuous plasma filtration group was 6.98% (3/43), which was significantly lower than that in routine treatment group [25.58% (11/43)], chi(2)=5.460, P=0.023. Conclusions: Continuous plasma filtration adsorption is effective in treating severely burned patients with sepsis, which can alleviate inflammatory reaction mediated by inflammatory cytokine with good prognosis.
3.
Platelet-rich plasma for treating acute wounds: a meta-analysis . Chinese
Wang L, Gu Z, Gao C
Chung-Hua i Hsueh Tsa Chih [Chinese Medical Journal]. 2014;94((28):):2169-74.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of acute wounds. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified from PubMed (1950.1-2014.2), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, issue 4, 2014) of Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1979.1-2014.2), China Biology Medicine (CBM, 1978.1-2014.2) WANFANG database (1990.1-2014.2). References of retrieved articles were also identified. The quality of each RCT was evaluated by the Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias. Data analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.1 to evaluate the efficacy of PRP in the treatment of acute wounds. RESULTS A total of 13 articles involving 982 patients were included. The results of systematic review and analysis showed that wound healing time of PRP treatment group was shorter than that of control group, so did length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD): -1.45, 95%CI:-2.07 to -0.83; P < 0.01), the incidence of wound healing disturbance in PRP treatment group was less than that of control group (relative risk (RR): 0.11, 95%CI: 0.01 to 0.83; P < 0.05), so did blood product transfusion. Moreover, post-traumatic pain level of PRP treatment group was lower than that of control group (MD: -1.26, 95%CI: -1.71 to -0.82; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Use of PRP can shorten acute wound healing time and length of hospital stay, reduce the incidence of disturbed wound healing and blood products transfusion and alleviate post-traumatic pain. Moreover, it has some effect on the control of wound infections.