0
selected
-
1.
Apheresis Technique for Acute Hyperlipidemic Pancreatitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lin YF, Yao Y, Xu Y, Huang HB
Digestive diseases and sciences. 2022
-
-
-
Full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND The apheresis technique is increasingly used in patients with hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis (HTGP), while its role in this context is still not well established. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of an apheresis therapy compared to usual care in such a patient population. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases up to July 10, 2021. Studies were included if they focused on HTGP treated with or without apheresis technique. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was the mortality rate. We also explored the heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias. RESULTS Sixteen observational studies with 1476 adults were included. The overall quality of included studies was moderate. Despite better TG level reduction with apheresis therapy (mean difference [MD], 12.27 mmol/L, 95% CI, 3.74 to 20.81; I(2) = 78%; P = 0.005), use of apheresis did not reduce the mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.59; P = 0.95) compared with usual care. This result was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis. The length of stay in hospital (MD, 0.96 days; 95% CI, - 1.22 to 3.14; I(2) = 70%; P = 0.39) and most complications were similar between the groups, while hospital cost was significantly higher in the apheresis group. CONCLUSIONS The apheresis technique did not decrease the mortality in HTGP patients compared with usual care. Until the results of high-quality RCTs are known, these findings do not support the routine use of the apheresis technique in such a patient population.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients with hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis, (16 studies, n= 1,476).
Intervention
Apheresis therapy.
Comparison
Usual care.
Outcome
Despite better triglycerides level reduction with apheresis therapy (mean difference [MD], 12.27 mmol/L), use of apheresis did not reduce the mortality compared with usual care. The length of stay in hospital (MD, 0.96 days) and most complications were similar between the groups, while hospital cost was significantly higher in the apheresis group. The overall quality of included studies was moderate.
-
2.
A prognostic score for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with plasma exchange-centered artificial liver support system
Du L, Ma Y, Zhou S, Chen F, Xu Y, Wang M, Lei X, Feng P, Tang H, Bai L
Scientific reports. 2021;11(1):1469
Abstract
Artificial liver support system (ALSS) therapy is widely used in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF). We aimed to develop a predictive score to identify the subgroups who may benefit from plasma exchange (PE)-centered ALSS therapy. A total of 601 patients were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a derivation cohort of 303 patients and a validation cohort of 298 patients for logistic regression analysis, respectively. Five baseline variables, including liver cirrhosis, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio of prothrombin time, infection and hepatic encephalopathy, were found independently associated with 3-month mortality. A predictive PALS model and the simplified PALS score were developed. The predicative value of PALS score (AUROC = 0.818) to 3-month prognosis was as capable as PALS model (AUROC = 0.839), R score (AUROC = 0.824) and Yue-Meng' score (AUROC = 0.810) (all p > 0.05), and superior to CART model (AUROC = 0.760) and MELD score (AUROC = 0.765) (all p < 0.05). The PALS score had significant linear correlation with 3-month mortality (R(2) = 0.970, p = 0.000). PALS score of 0-2 had both sensitivity and negative predictive value of > 90% for 3-month mortality, while PALS score of 6-9 had both specificity and positive predictive value of > 90%. Patients with PALS score of 3-5 who received 3-5 sessions of ALSS therapy had much lower 3-month mortality than those who received 1-2 sessions (32.8% vs. 59.2%, p < 0.05). The more severe patients with PALS score of 6-9 could still benefit from ≥ 6 sessions of ALSS therapy compared to ≤ 2 sessions (63.6% vs. 97.0%, p < 0.05). The PALS score could predict prognosis reliably and conveniently. It could identify the subgroups who could benefit from PE-centered ALSS therapy, and suggest the reasonable sessions.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000032055. Registered 19th April 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=52471 .
-
3.
Efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of severe influenza
Xu Z, Zhou J, Huang Y, Liu X, Xu Y, Chen S, Liu D, Lin Z, Liu X, Li Y
Crit Care. 2020;24(1):469
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Editor's Choice
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convalescent plasma administration may be of clinical benefit in patients with severe influenza, but reports on the efficacy of this therapy vary. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the administration of convalescent plasma to treat severe influenza. Healthcare databases were searched in February 2020. All records were screened against eligibility criteria, and the risks of bias were assessed. The primary outcome was the fatality rate. RESULTS A total of 2861 studies were retrieved and screened. Five eligible RCTs were identified. Pooled analyses yielded no evidence that using convalescent plasma to treat severe influenza resulted in significant reductions in mortality (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.51-2·23; P = 0.87; I(2) = 35%), number of days in the intensive care unit, or number of days on mechanical ventilation. This treatment may have the possible benefits of increasing hemagglutination inhibition titers and reducing influenza B viral loads and cytokine levels. No serious adverse events were reported. The included studies were generally of high quality with a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS The administration of convalescent plasma appears safe but may not reduce the mortality, number of days in the intensive care unit, or number of days on mechanical ventilation in patients with severe influenza.
PICO Summary
Population
Patients hospitalized with severe influenza (5 studies, n= 598).
Intervention
Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune intravenous immunoglobulin (H-IVIG).
Comparison
Various comparators (normal intravenous immunoglobulin, standard care, low-titre anti-influenza, placebo).
Outcome
Pooled analyses yielded no evidence that using convalescent plasma to treat severe influenza resulted in significant reductions in mortality, number of days in the intensive care unit, or number of days on mechanical ventilation.
-
4.
Potential effective treatment for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of the severe infectious disease with convalescent plasma therapy
Sun M, Xu Y, He H, Zhang L, Wang X, Qiu Q, Sun C, Guo Y, Qiu S, Ma K
Int J Infect Dis. 2020
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convalescent plasma (CP) has been used successfully to treat many types of infectious diseases, and it has shown initial effects in the treatment of the emerging 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, its curative effect and feasibility have yet to be confirmed by formal evaluation and well-designed clinical trials. To explore the effectiveness of treatment and predict the potential effect of CP for COVID-19, studies of different types of infectious diseases treated with CP were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS Related studies were obtained from databases and screened based on the inclusion criteria. The data quality was assessed, and the data were extracted and pooled for analysis. RESULTS We included 40 studies on CP treatment for infectious diseases We found that CP treatment could reduce the risk of mortality with a low incidence of adverse events, promote the production of antibodies, show the decline in viral load, and shorten the disease course. A meta-analysis of 15 controlled studies showed that there was a significantly lower mortality rate in the group treated with CP (pooled OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.52, P < 0.001, I(2) = 54%) than in the control groups. Studies were mostly of low or very low quality with a moderate or high risk of bias. The sources of clinical and methodological heterogeneity were identified. The exclusion of heterogeneity indicated that the results were stable. CONCLUSIONS CP therapy has some curative effect and is well tolerated to treat infectious diseases. It is a potentially effective treatment for COVID-19.
-
5.
The effect of erythropoietin-stimulating agents on health-related quality of life in anemia of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Collister D, Komenda P, Hiebert B, Gunasekara R, Xu Y, Eng F, Lerner B, Macdonald K, Rigatto C, Tangri N
Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016;164((7):):472-8
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) for improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear. Purpose: To determine the effect of ESAs on HRQOL at different hemoglobin targets in adults with CKD who were receiving or not receiving dialysis. Data Sources: Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 1 November 2015, supplemented with manual screening. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials that evaluated the treatment of anemia with ESAs, including erythropoietin and darbepoetin, targeted higher versus lower hemoglobin levels, and used validated HRQOL metrics. Data Extraction: Study characteristics, quality, and data were assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Outcome measures were scores on the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Kidney Dialysis Questionnaire (KDQ), and other tools. Data Synthesis: Of 17 eligible studies, 13 reported SF-36 outcomes and 4 reported KDQ outcomes. Study populations consisted of patients not undergoing dialysis (n = 12), those undergoing dialysis (n = 4), or a mixed sample (n = 1). Only 4 studies had low risk of bias. Pooled analyses showed that higher hemoglobin targets resulted in no statistically or clinically significant differences in SF-36 or KDQ domains. Differences in HRQOL were further attenuated in studies at low risk of bias and in subgroups of dialysis recipients. Limitation: Statistically significant heterogeneity among studies, few good-quality studies, and possible publication bias. Conclusion: ESA treatment of anemia to obtain higher hemoglobin targets does not result in important differences in HRQOL in patients with CKD. Primary Funding Source: KRESCENT and Manitoba Health Research Council Establishment.
-
6.
Effect and safety of TNF inhibitors in immunoglobulin-resistant Kawasaki disease: a meta-analysis
Xue LJ, Wu R, Du GL, Xu Y, Yuan KY, Feng ZC, Pan YL, Hu GY
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology. 2016;52((3):):389-400
Abstract
Previous studies showed that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors might decrease the rate of coronary artery abnormalities in pediatrics with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)-resistant Kawasaki disease (KD). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of TNF inhibitors in IVIG-resistant KD. We undertook a meta-analysis of clinical trials identified in systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Google scholar through May 2016. Five studies were included. Overall, rate of coronary artery aneurysm was comparable between groups (relative risk (RR), 1.05; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI), 0.60 to 1.81; P = 0.87). No significant differences were recorded between groups in coronary artery Z scores (standardized mean difference (SMD), 0.27; 95 % CI, -0.30 to 0.85; P = 0.35). Meanwhile, TNF inhibitors were not associated with a significant decreased risk of treatment resistance compared with IVIG treatment (RR, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.37 to 0.15; P = 0.14). However, days of fever was significantly reduced in the TNF inhibitor group (SMD, -0.66; 95 % CI, -0.90 to -0.41; P < 0.001). Additionally, risk of serious adverse events was similar between groups. Therefore, TNF inhibitors could shorten the duration of fever in IVIG-resistant KD. However, TNF inhibitors appear to have no cardioprotective effect in patients with IVIG-resistant KD.
-
7.
The cost effectiveness of erythropoietin-stimulating agents for treating anemia in patients on dialysis: a systematic review
Ferguson T, Xu Y, Gunasekara R, Lerner B, Macdonald K, Rigatto C, Tangri N, Komenda P
American Journal of Nephrology. 2015;41((2):):89-97.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anemia is a common complication associated with kidney failure and is marked by poor health and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. There are ongoing concerns with the use of Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to treat anemia in patients with kidney failure on dialysis. Questions as to their benefits, harms and overall effect on quality of life are still relevant today. Our objective was to systematically review studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of ESAs in patients with kidney failure on dialysis. METHODS We performed a systematic review of studies determining the cost-effectiveness of ESAs in adult patients on dialysis. Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, were searched from their establishment until June 2013. Studies that reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of hemoglobin correction strategies based on ESA treatments in comparison to red blood cell transfusions, lower hemoglobin targets, or no ESA treatment were included. RESULTS Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Reported cost/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) ratios ranged from USD 931-677,749/QALY across five studies comparing ESAs to red blood cell transfusions. There was heterogeneity in results when considering higher hemoglobin targets, with studies finding higher targets to be both dominant and dominated. Mortality, hospitalization, and utility estimates were major drivers. CONCLUSIONS There is substantial variability in the estimates of the cost-effectiveness of using ESAs in the dialysis population. New models incorporating recent meta-analyses for estimates of utility, mortality, and hospitalization changes would allow for a more comprehensive answer to this question. 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.