1.
The therapeutic value of arthroscopic microfracture technique in combination with platelet-rich plasma injection for knee cartilage injury
Yang Z, Wu Y, Yin K, Xiang J, Liu C, Chen W, Dai Z
American journal of translational research. 2021;13(4):2694-2701
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection combined with arthroscopic microfracture technique for knee cartilage injury. METHODS Seventy-nine patients with knee cartilage injury were randomly divided into a control group (CG, n=39) and an observation group (OBG, n=40). Both of the groups were treated with the arthroscopic microfracture technique, and the OBG was additionally treated with PRP injection. RESULTS The VAS scores for pain in the affected area of the OBG were lower than those of the CG at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after surgery (P < 0.05). Knee flexion, hyperextension, and rotation angles in the OBG were greater than those in the CG at 1 month after surgery (P < 0.05). IKDC scores in the OBG were lower than those in the CG at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after surgery (P < 0.05). The Tegner and Lysholm scores in the OBG were higher than those in the CG at 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery (P < 0.05). The complication rate in the OBG was 10.00%, which was lower than that of 28.21% in the CG (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The efficacy of microfracture technique combined with PRP injection in the treatment of knee joint cartilage injury is significantly improved compared with that of microfracture technique alone, which can reduce postoperative complications and improve the range of motion and function of the knee joint.
2.
Artificial Dermis and Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma for Treatment of Refractory Wounds: A Clinical Study
Lv Y, Yang Z, Chen Z, Xie J, Li H, Lou Y, Cao D
The international journal of lower extremity wounds. 2021;:15347346211050710
Abstract
Refractory wounds present a complex and serious clinical dilemma in plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, there are currently no standard guidelines for the treatment of refractory wounds. Artificial dermis (AD) has achieved some satisfactory results, but also has some limitations. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), as a cell-therapy material, was a valuable and safe treatment dressing for chronic non-healing wounds. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacies of artificial dermis (AD) with and without autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients with refractory wounds. Sixteen patients with refractory wounds were randomly allocated to autologous PRP therapy combined with artificial dermis (PRP + AD [N = 8]) or an artificial dermis program only (AD [N = 8]). We compared the efficacies of the two methods in terms of times to wound healing, infection control, and AD vascularization, as well as hospitalization days and eventual clinical outcomes.13 patients achieved complete healing, including seven (87.5%) in the PRP + AD group and six (75.0%) in the AD group (P > .05). The times to wound healing, infection control, and AD vascularization, and hospitalization time after transfer were significantly shorter in the PRP + AD group compared with the AD group (P < .05). In conclusion, the combination of AD and PRP promoted refractory wound healing and shortened waiting times compared with simple dermal grafts.
3.
Clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma as adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of meniscal injury
Wang Y, Yao C, Yang Z, Guo W
The Journal of international medical research. 2020;48(9):300060520955059
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of meniscal injury remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of PRP in the treatment of meniscal injury and provide evidence for the selection of clinical treatment options. METHODS A computer-based search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to retrieve articles using the search terms "platelet-rich plasma" and "menisci." Quality evaluation and data extraction were performed. The combined effect was assessed using RevMan version 5.3 software. RESULTS Three randomized controlled trials and three cohort studies involving 293 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the International Knee Documentation Committee score or Lysholm score between the experimental and control groups. The failure rate and visual analog scale score were significantly lower and the degree of active flexion was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group. CONCLUSION The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that PRP injection can effectively enhance the efficacy of arthroscopic repair of meniscal injury, reduce the failure rate and severity of pain, and improve active flexion.
4.
Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections for knee osteoarthritis: an overview of systematic reviews and risk of bias considerations
Xing D, Wang B, Zhang W, Yang Z, Hou Y, Chen Y, Lin J
International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. 2017;20((11):):1612-1630
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Numerous systematic reviews investigating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in treating knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been recently published. The purpose of the present study was (1) to perform an overview of overlapping systematic reviews investigating PRP for knee OA via evaluating methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews and (2) to provide recommendations through the best evidence. METHODS A systematic search of systematic reviews published through Feb 2017 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included systematic reviews were assessed by AMSTAR instrument and ROBIS tool respectively. Best evidence choice procedure was conducted according to the Jadad decision algorithm. The systematic reviews with high quality of methodology and low risk of bias were selected ultimately. RESULTS Ten systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion. The Jadad decision making tool suggested that the reviews with highest AMSTAR score should be selected. According to the ROBIS tool, there were 4 systematic reviews with low risk of bias and 6 with high risk of bias. As a result, two systematic reviews conducted by Dai et al and Meheux et al with highest AMSTAR score and low risk of bias were selected as the best evidence. CONCLUSIONS The present overview demonstrates that PRP is an effective intervention in treating knee OA without increased risk of adverse events. Therefore, the present conclusions may help decision makers interpret and choose PRP with more confidence.