Abstract

UNLABELLED Bleeding is a feared complication of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and significant coagulopathy (as defined by routine coagulation tests) and is used to justify preprocedure use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and/or platelets (PLT). Thromboelastography (TEG) provides a more comprehensive global coagulation assessment than routine tests (international normalized ratio [INR] and platelet count), and its use may avoid unnecessary blood product transfusion in patients with cirrhosis and significant coagulopathy (defined in this study as INR >1.8 and/or platelet count <50 x 10(9) /L) who will be undergoing an invasive procedure. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to TEG-guided transfusion strategy or standard of care (SOC; 1:1 TEG:SOC). The TEG group would receive FFP if the reaction time (r) was >40 min and/or PLT if maximum amplitude (MA) was <30 mm. All SOC patients received FFP and/or PLT per hospital guidelines. Endpoints were blood product use and bleeding complications. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. Per protocol, all subjects in the SOC group received blood product transfusions versus 5 in the TEG group (100% vs. 16.7%; P<0.0001). Sixteen SOC (53.3%) received FFP, 10 (33.3%) PLT, and 4 (13.3%) both FFP and PLT. In the TEG group, none received FFP alone (P<0.0001 vs. SOC), 2 received PLT (6.7%; P=0.009 vs. SOC), and 3 both FFP and PLT (not significant). Postprocedure bleeding occurred in only 1 patient (SOC group) after large-volume paracentesis. CONCLUSIONS In patients with cirrhosis and significant coagulopathy before invasive procedures, TEG-guided transfusion strategy leads to a significantly lower use of blood products compared to SOC (transfusion guided by INR and platelet count), without an increase in bleeding complications. Remarkably, even in patients with significant coagulopathy, postprocedure bleeding was rare, indicating that TEG thresholds should be reevaluated. (Hepatology 2016;63:566-573).Copyright © 2015 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Graft reperfusion in orthotopic liver transplantation is often associated with significant hemodynamic changes, including decreased systemic vascular resistance and arterial blood pressure. Vasopressive drugs are often required to maintain adequate perfusion pressure during the early postreperfusion period. The exact mechanism of this postreperfusion syndrome is unknown, but release of bradykinin, a potent vasodilatator, via the kallikrein system may play a role. Aprotinin is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of serine proteases such as kallikrein and therefore may ameliorate the postreperfusion syndrome and reduce the need for vasopressors. METHODS In a randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared hemodynamic variables (systemic vascular resistance, cardiac index, arterial blood pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure) and the requirement of epinephrine during transplantation in 67 patients who received either high-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU] at induction, continuous infusion of 1 x 10(6) KIU/h, 1 x 10(6) KIU before reperfusion; n = 24), regular-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) KIU at induction, continuous infusion of 0.5 x 10(6) KIU/h; n = 21), or placebo (n = 22). RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar for all three groups. Erythrocyte transfusion requirement was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with both aprotinin-treated groups. No major differences in hemodynamic variables were found between the three groups. The total amount of epinephrine (median, range) used during transplantation, however, was significantly lower in patients who received aprotinin (high dose, 20, 0-170 microg; regular dose, 30, 0-140 microg), compared with patients who received placebo (70, 0-2,970 microg; P = 0.0017). This difference was largely attributable to differences in the early postreperfusion period. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic use of aprotinin ameliorates the postreperfusion syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation, as reflected by a significant reduction in vasopressor requirements.

Abstract

BACKGROUND In the European Multicenter Study on the Use of Aprotinin in Liver Transplantation (EMSALT), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study, we demonstrated that aprotinin significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Aprotinin is metabolized in the kidney and potentially nephrotoxic at high concentrations. Renal insufficiency is a common and serious complication after OLT. It is unknown whether aprotinin increases the risk of renal failure after OLT. METHODS We analyzed intraoperative urine output, need for postoperative dialysis, perioperative serum creatinine levels, and creatinine clearance in 93 patients enrolled in EMSALT, receiving a high dose of aprotinin, a regular dose, or placebo. RESULTS Peak increase in serum creatinine exceeding 0.5 mg/dl during one of the postoperative days occurred in 11 (35%) patients in the placebo group, in 11 (34%) patients in the high-dose group, but only in 1 (3%) patient in the regular-dose group (P=0.007). Furthermore, a perioperative decrease in creatinine clearance was seen in the placebo group (-23.9+/-10.1 ml/min) but not in both high-dose (-1.6+/-13.3 ml/min) and regular-dose (9.7+/-10.3 ml/min) groups (P<0.02 comparing regular-dose and placebo group). CONCLUSIONS Despite its potential nephrotoxicity, the use of aprotinin for reducing blood loss during OLT does not lead to a higher incidence of postoperative renal insufficiency. In combination with the observed reduction in blood loss, these findings support the prophylactic use of regular-dose aprotinin during OLT.

Abstract

Aprotinin reduces blood transfusion requirements in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Concern has been voiced about the potential risk for thrombotic complications when aprotinin is used. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of aprotinin on the two components of the hemostatic system (coagulation and fibrinolysis) in patients undergoing OLT. As part of a larger, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we compared coagulation (fibrinogen level, activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], prothrombin time, and platelet count) and fibrinolytic variables (tissue-type plasminogen activator [tPA] antigen and activity, plasminogen activator inhibitor activity, and D-dimer), as well as thromboelastography (reaction time [r], clot formation time, and maximum amplitude) in 27 patients administered either high-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibitor units [KIU] at induction, continuous infusion of 1 x 10(6) KIU/h, and 1 x 10(6) KIU before reperfusion; n = 10), regular-dose aprotinin (2 x 10(6) KIU at induction and continuous infusion of 0.5 x 10(6) KIU/h; n = 8), or placebo (n = 9) during OLT. Blood samples were drawn at seven standardized intraoperative times. Baseline characteristics were similar for the three groups. During the anhepatic and postreperfusion periods, fibrinolytic activity (plasma D-dimer and tPA antigen levels) was significantly lower in aprotinin-treated patients compared with the placebo group. Interestingly, coagulation times (aPTT and r) were significantly more prolonged in aprotinin-treated patients than the placebo group. No difference was seen in the incidence of perioperative thrombotic complications in the entire study population (n = 137). Aprotinin has an anticoagulant rather than a procoagulant effect. Its blood-sparing (prohemostatic) effect appears to be the overall result of a strong antifibrinolytic and a weaker anticoagulant effect. These findings argue against a prothrombotic effect of aprotinin in patients undergoing OLT.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Intraoperative hyperfibrinolysis contributes to bleeding during adult orthotopic liver transplantation. We aimed to find out whether aprotinin, a potent antifibrinolytic agent, reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which six liver-transplant centres participated. Patients undergoing primary liver transplantation were randomly assigned intraoperative high-dose aprotinin, regular-dose aprotinin, or placebo. Primary endpoints were intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Secondary endpoints were perioperative fluid requirements, postoperative blood transfusions, complications, and mortality. FINDINGS 137 patients received high-dose aprotinin (n=46), regular-dose aprotinin (n=43), or placebo (n=48). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the aprotinin-treated patients, with a reduction of 60% in the high-dose group and 44% in the regular-dose group, compared with the placebo group (p=0.03). Total amount of red blood cell (homologous and autologous) transfusion requirements was 37% lower in the high-dose group and 20% lower in the regular-dose group, than in the placebo group (p=0.02). Thromboembolic events occurred in two patients in the high-dose group, none in the regular-dose group, and in two patients in the placebo group (p=0.39). Mortality at 30 days did not differ between the three groups (6.5%, 4.7%, and 8.3%; p=0.79). INTERPRETATION Intraoperative use of aprotinin in adult patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation significantly reduces blood-transfusion requirements and should be routinely used in patients without contraindications.