Transfusion Evidence Library
  • Home
  • About
  • Help
  • Alert
  • Account
    • Login
    • Create
Advertisement
Banner promoting the Transfusion Evidence Round-Up for World Haemophilia Day, March 2023.
Advertisement
Banner celebrating two decades of the Systematic Review Initiative - 2002 to 2022
Advertisement
Banner inviting you to subscribe to the free monthly Transfusion Evidence Alert email and the free quarterly Transfusion Evidence Round-Up email.
Back to Home
  • Advanced
    • Find article
    • Advanced search

Date

  • Past 5 Years
  • Past 10 Years
  • Published Between:

Full Text

  • 1 Abstract available
  • 0 Clinical Commentary available
  • 1 Free full text available
  • 1 Full text available
  • 1 PICO Summary available

Subject Area

  • 0 Adverse Effects of Transfusion
    • 0 Haemolytic Reactions
  • 0 Alternatives to Blood
    • 0 Albumin
    • 0 Antifibrinolytics
    • 0 Autologous Transfusion and Cell Salvage
    • 0 Gene Therapy
    • 0 Management of Anaemia
    • 0 Non-Drug Interventions
    • 0 Non-drug Interventions
    • 0 Other Drug Interventions
    • 0 Recombinant Coagulation Factors
  • 1 Blood Components
    • 0 Albumin
    • 0 Convalescent Plasma
    • 0 Cryoprecipitate
    • 0 Plasma/FFP
    • 0 Platelet Related Components
    • 0 Platelets
    • 1 Red Cells
    • 0 White Cells/Granulocytes
  • 0 Clinical Practice
    • 0 Albumin
    • 0 Assessment of Abnormal Haemostasis
    • 0 Errors and Near Misses
    • 0 Measuring Blood Loss
    • 0 Transfusion Education
    • 0 Transfusion Practice
  • 0 Fractionated Blood Products
    • 0 Activated Protein C
    • 0 Albumin
    • 0 Anti-D IG
    • 0 Factor VIII
    • 0 Factor XIII
    • 0 Fibrinogen Concentrate
    • 0 Hyperimmune Immunoglobulin
    • 0 Immunoglobulin G and IVIG
    • 0 Prothrombin Complex Concentrate
  • 0 Therapeutic Apheresis
    • 0 Plasmapheresis

Expert Opinion

  • 1 Editor's Choice

Study Design

  • 0 Economic Study
  • 0 Randomised Controlled Trial
  • 1 Systematic Review
Results for 'author:"Farmer SL"' • 1 results
Select all Clear all selections
0 selected
  1. 1. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing mortality in restrictive and liberal haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion: an overview of systematic reviews
    Trentino KM, Farmer SL, Leahy MF, Sanfilippo FM, Isbister JP, Mayberry R, Hofmann A, Shander A, French C, Murray K
    BMC Med. 2020;18(1):154
    • Free full text
    • Editor's Choice

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND There are no overviews of systematic reviews investigating haemoglobin thresholds for transfusion. This is important as the literature on transfusion thresholds has grown considerably in recent years. Our aim was to synthesise evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effects of restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies on mortality. METHODS This was a systematic review of systematic reviews (overview). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database, from 2008 to 2018. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials comparing mortality in patients assigned to red cell transfusion strategies based on haemoglobin thresholds. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. We assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR 2 and the quality of evidence pooled using an algorithm to assign GRADE levels. RESULTS We included 19 systematic reviews reporting 33 meta-analyses of mortality outcomes from 53 unique randomised controlled trials. Of the 33 meta-analyses, one was graded as high quality, 15 were moderate, and 17 were low. Of the meta-analyses presenting high- to moderate-quality evidence, 12 (75.0%) reported no statistically significant difference in mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion groups and four (25.0%) reported significantly lower mortality for patients assigned to a restrictive transfusion strategy. We found few systematic reviews addressed clinical differences between included studies: variation was observed in haemoglobin threshold concentrations, the absolute between group difference in haemoglobin threshold concentration, time to randomisation (resulting in transfusions administered prior to randomisation), and transfusion dosing regimens. CONCLUSIONS Meta-analyses graded as high to moderate quality indicate that in most patient populations no difference in mortality exists between patients assigned to a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019120503.
    PICO Summary

    Population

    Patients assigned to red cell transfusion strategies based on haemoglobin thresholds (19 studies).

    Intervention

    Restrictive transfusion strategy.

    Comparison

    Liberal transfusion strategy.

    Outcome

    Of the meta-analyses presenting high- to moderate-quality evidence, 12 reported no statistically significant difference in mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion groups and 4 reported significantly lower mortality for patients assigned to a restrictive transfusion strategy. Few systematic reviews addressed clinical differences between included studies: variation was observed in haemoglobin threshold concentrations, the absolute between group difference in haemoglobin threshold concentration, time to randomisation, and transfusion dosing regimens.
    0 ⋅ Show comments
  • Page 1 of 1 pages
© Copyright 2023, Evidentia Publishing, B.V.
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Linked In
  • Like us on Facebook
  • Terms of use
  • Contact us