Abstract

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) gel in the treatment of refractory pressure injuries and its effect on wound healing time and quality of life of patients. METHODS A random number table method was used to group 102 patients with refractory pressure injuries into either a control group (CG) (51 cases) receiving negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or a study group (SG) (51 cases) receiving NPWT+PRP gel. RESULTS The total efficacy rate in the SG (92.16%) was higher than that in the CG (76.47%) (p<0.05). The SG exhibited lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores and pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH) scores, smaller wound sizes and depths, and shorter wound healing times than the CG after 21 days of treatment (p<0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the SG scored higher than the CG on the psychological, physiological, social functions, and daily activity domains on the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) scale (p<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the SG (13.73%) was not significantly different from that of the CG (7.84%) (p>0.05). CONCLUSION In the treatment of refractory pressure injuries, PRP gel can accelerate wound healing, reduce wound pain, shorten the treatment cycle, regulate tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels and the expression of specific proteins in granulation tissue, reduce the levels of the inflammatory factors interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and improve the quality of life of patients without increasing complications.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI)-guided fluid resuscitation on the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure and septic shock. Methods: This study was a prospective randomized controlled study. Consecutive eligible patients were divided into 2 groups according to the random number table method: control group (n=21) and experimental group (n=20). On the basis of routine treatment, patients in the control group received early goal-directed therapy until the central venous pressure (CVP) reaching 8-12 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), mean arterial pressure reaching over 65 mmHg, urine volume reaching over 0.5 ml.kg(-1).h(-1), and central venous oxygen saturation reaching more than 70%. On the basis of routine treatment, patients in the experimental group were monitored continuously on cardiac output with pulse indication and fluid resuscitation guided by volume index GEDI. The GEDI should be maintained on the range of 680-800 ml/m(2). The remaining resuscitation goals were the same as control group. General clinical data of the two groups were collected at admission. Negative fluid balance onset time, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU mortality and 28-day mortality were compared between the two groups. The outcomes were recorded as listed: start time of negative fluid balance, duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality in ICU and 28-day mortality. Results: There was no significant difference in age, sex, weight, APACHE score, SOFA score and NYHA functional class score between the two groups (all P>0.05). The negative liquid balance onset time in the control group was 3.5 (2.5, 4.0) days, which was significantly longer than that in the experimental group (2.6 (2.0, 3.0) days,U=115.0, P=0.012). The duration of mechanical ventilation was 355 (118, 552) hours in the control group, which was significantly longer than that in the experimental group (132 (36.75, 233.3) hours, U=130, P=0.038). The ICU mortality was 38.1% (8/21) in the control group, tended to be higher than that in the experimental group (20.0%(4/20), chi(2)=1.620, P=0.203). The 28-day mortality was 42.9% (9/21) in the control group, similar as in the experimental group (25.0%(5/20), chi(2)=1.482,P=0.477). Conclusion: Fluid resuscitation guided by volume index (GEDI) may improve the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure complicated with septic shock.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of erythropoietin (EPO) for treating patients with carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. We conducted a randomized, prospective study of 103 patients with CO poisoning in two groups: an EPO group (n = 54; patients received EPO) and a placebo group (n = 49; patients received normal saline). The study endpoints were the functional outcome at day 30 (the Barthel index and neurologic sequelae), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and the levels of S-100. At 18 days, the NIHSS score improved significantly and S-100 levels significantly decreased in patients in the EPO group. At 30 days, patients in the EPO group had a superior Barthel index and fewer patients had delayed neurologic sequelae (DNS). This study demonstrated that early administration of EPO to patients with CO poisoning improved neurological outcomes and reduced the incidence of DNS. 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of plasma exchange (PE) combined with hemofiltration (HF) on liver failure. METHODS Seventy-seven inpatients with liver failure admitted during January 2006 to August 2007 were randomly assigned to receive PE combined with HF (PE+HF group, 38 cases), or PE alone (PE group, 39 cases). Forty-one inpatients with liver failure who had not received artificial liver support treatment were assigned to serve as control group. The survival rates and biochemical parameters of three groups were compared. RESULTS There was no significant difference in biochemical parameters before treatment among three groups. Compared with pre-treatment values, albumin (Alb), cholinesterase (ChE) and prothrombin activity (PTA) of both PE group and PE+HF group were significantly increased after treatment, and total bilirubin (TBIL), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) of both PE group and PE+HF group were significantly decreased after treatment (P<0. 05 or P<0. 01). The survival rate of PE group, PE+HF group and control group was 48. 7% (19/39), 68. 4% (26/38), and 29. 3% (12/41) respectively. The survival rate of PE+HF group was significantly higher than that of control group (chi(2)=12. 11, P<0. 01). The rate of recovery of consciousness of patients with hepatic encephalopathy in PE+HF group was higher than that of PE group (42. 8% vs. 0, P<0. 05). Compared with PE alone, the result was better when it was combined with HF in correction of electrolyte disturbance and acid-base imbalance (19/23 vs. 0/21, P<0. 05). CONCLUSION Treatment of liver failure by PE combined with HF is safe and effective, and its efficacy is higher than PE alone.